- Jul 12, 2020
- 14,400
- 35,679
- 997
Why not PNG or Web? Little to no loss and significantly smaller file size than a normal JPG.View attachment 847844 View attachment 847851 View attachment 847853
Unlocked
You must be registered to see the links
OK, I played around a little bit with a program someone recommended me (greetings to Britt Runa).
Here's the first render of the new update in 720p (the bigger image) and the 1080p upscaled version. The other two are also first in 720p and the second in upscaled 1080p. I think for a temporary solution it could be fine. (Maybe even for a durable???) The only catch is that the image size gets also 2x larger but which also would be the case with real 1080p. I'll need to try to reduce the size to jpg as much as possible without losing too much of the quality.
Just tell me what you think of it. Of course the upscaling takes some additional time but not much. Per render maybe 1-3 minutes, because not every render has the same adjustment.