OZtheW1ZARD
Member
- Aug 24, 2021
- 223
- 737
- 208
Oh my God. It is the same formula as provided few posts up.Provide a formula that results in 12.5%, and demonstrate that it's correct. (Figures for 2023 compared to 2022)
Oh my God. It is the same formula as provided few posts up.Provide a formula that results in 12.5%, and demonstrate that it's correct. (Figures for 2023 compared to 2022)
I found your calculation formula. So I deleted my post.Oh my God. It is the same formula as provided few posts up.
I had overlooked the difference between relative and decline rates so far, so I didn't wonder about your formula.Oh my God. It is the same formula as provided few posts up.
No, calculation is correct. Year on year % difference in the render count.I had overlooked the difference between relative and decline rates so far, so I didn't wonder about your formula.
Now that I have looked it up, the relative ratio formula does not yield a rate of decline.
So recalculate using the formula to derive the decline rate.
Your formula doesn't fit this situation.
This is the formula that resulted in the 12.5% you mentioned.No, calculation is correct. Year on year % difference in the render count.
Also the graph confirms it.
View attachment 3756207
Feel free to share your findings together with methodology if you disagree.
Simultaneously the boys have become literal men.The game started with her looking like 32, then he changed her into a 30ish face and late 20ish body. Now she is mid 20s face and very low 20s body (the gym scenes are ridiculous). By the time she has sex, she will look like an 8 yo.
You know it is. Why are you asking?This is the formula that resulted in the 12.5% you mentioned.
"=((1646/1883)*100)-100", that's right?
This is the relative ratio you calculated.You know it is. Why are you asking?
You know it is the same as 1646/100=1883/X right?)
I've actually made a little oopsie when I added the numbers together. Added a missing update from 2019 (aswell as the percentages);Go argue with the person who provided the numbers.
ThanksI've actually made a little oopsie when I added the numbers together. Added a missing update from 2019 (aswell as the percentages);
2018: 2685 renders
2019: 2775 renders - 3.35196% increase compared to 2018
2020: 2328 renders - 16.1081% decrease compared to 2019
2021: 1872 renders - 19.5876% decrease compared to 2020
2022: 1646 renders - 12.0726% decrease compared to 2021
2023: 1123 renders - 31.774% decrease compared to 2022
Or alternatively, if you wanna add v0.195 from January 6th 2024 to 2023;
2023(v2): 1887 renders - 14.6416% increase compared to 2022
Now you guys can continue ...![]()
Or she'll have disappeared, as not born yet.The game started with her looking like 32, then he changed her into a 30ish face and late 20ish body. Now she is mid 20s face and very low 20s body (the gym scenes are ridiculous). By the time she has sex, she will look like an 8 yo.
Your bad luck! L&P and I plan to live forever!When AWAM is over, some of us may be.....dead.
Others will have changed their mentality, will have made a life for themselves.
Those who will be lucky enough to see AWAM completed have not yet been born.
Sad truth.
I guess someone has to keep the fabric touching alive.Your bad luck! L&P and I plan to live forever!
Poor mortal!
Yes, yes, not everyone is blessed and has to post their misfortune here in this thread.
On a side note and this is not an attack.This is the relative ratio you calculated.
"=((1646/1883)*100)-100"
And the result is 12.58%.
This is the decline rate I calculated.
"=(1646-1883)/1646*100"
And the result is 14.39%.
Literally, it is to see the rate of decline by year.On a side note and this is not an attack.
Why did you decide to calculate decline rate for a pair of values? I understand doing this for all the years combined, but even then you are examining just the decline rate and not the actual decline value?
What I have done is to calculate by what % the following year changed in comparison to the previous one.
but applying it for just one year gives you very inaccurate value, plus it measures what is the rate of change and not the value of the rate itself. This is a bit like acceleration and speed in Physics.Literally, it is to see the rate of decline by year.
(From the beginning of the debate, the main point was that “L&P’s workload is decreasing.”)
palmtrees89 calculated with the same formula before I published mine.
This means that this formula is universal.
This is the formula I used:
The value of "=(100-80)/100*100" is 20%.
I can present this and explain to people that it's a 20% decrease.
This is the formula you used.
The value of "=(100/80*100)-100" is 25%.
How would you explain this to people?
It decreased from 100 to 80, and the decrease is 20%.but applying it for just one year gives you very inaccurate value, plus it measures what is the rate of change and not the value of the rate itself. This is a bit like acceleration and speed in Physics.