You are wrong from the premise of the conversation.
As I have already said, realism is not a matter of believing or not believing, but what LP declared.
The people who heard LP declared that the soccer field would be made into a diamond shape would evaluate it by looking at whether the soccer field is being made into a diamond shape.
It's absurd that this needs an explanation.
And I didn't compare incest, neither did your initial objection.
And this is your level and why I question whether a conversation is necessary.
You may be the only one who understands realism as "making it what you want it to be."
And this image you brought may be the result of your unreasonable assertion.You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
Anything is possible..... but confusing....... Huh?
I'll try to explain it to you in another way. When I look at Escher's picture, I see something that at first glance seems realistic in its details, but then conflicts with my knowledge of reality in the real world. Now I don't go and say, "Escher, you've done something wrong here, and I don't like that". Instead, I take what is there and get something out of it. The image needs the combination of realism and real world mismatch to achieve its effect.
AWAM is a porn game. That alone should be enough to explain why it can't be completely realistic. The important thing is to get some details right, which then create added value by breaking reality (e.g. in porn often by exaggeration). AWAM is also a game based on curuption. It made sense to make Sophia seem dismissive at first, and to make Dylan look like a looser in the beginning. In the end, however, these elements must reverse to achieve the best possible effect. So, No matter how you spin it, Sophia will have sex with Dylan at some point. In the game, Dylan will have used his intelligence and a little manipulation to achieve his goals. In reality, he would have failed. We all know that. However, it should be clear to all of us that realism alone has no value in porn. That is why I find your argumentation so nonsensical.
If this explanation does not help you, we should probably end this discussion. You are trying to make something out of AWAM that it never was and never can be. It is a pointless endeavor.