50% means he started Aiden's 3rd task. It seems to me that it took longer because of a new scenario!Remaining events in bold:
- Nursing home 20%
- Tutoring 25%
- Aiden's 3rd task 20%
- Dylan/Emma 10%
- Dylan/Sophia 15%
- Little side event 10%
50% means he started Aiden's 3rd task. It seems to me that it took longer because of a new scenario!Remaining events in bold:
- Nursing home 20%
- Tutoring 25%
- Aiden's 3rd task 20%
- Dylan/Emma 10%
- Dylan/Sophia 15%
- Little side event 10%
the 'exact date', nobody knows
if the speed becomes that of the version 0.115, not for approximately* 60 days +/- 1 week...
if it stays the same, approximately* 70 days +/- 1 week
* based on previous findings
As of now, this is what he said about the two side events.
I am not going to discuss this. I have been studying probability for some time, but not poker in particular. There are parts to take it.In poker, only 10% is your skills, the other 90% is luck, any professional poker player will say the same.
40% are done.
I think everyone agrees that Liam was set up. Whether he was sabotaged or not, we don't know, but it's pretty clear that the casino allowed something that should never have been allowed. Whether L&P intends for it to be bad luck for Liam, or active sabotage, is anyone's guess. Personally, I think Liam was sabotaged by Morello in order to get to Sophia. Liam was never going to leave the casino without losing big.I am not going to discuss this. I have been studying probability for some time, but not poker in particular. There are parts to take it.
But how the hell did the casino accept a very big bet with no money?
That would be the quickest setup in history since Don Morollo meets Sophia the same night Liam bet and lost the house on the same night. There has to be more to this story than one night. I wonder if Liam was visiting the Casino prior to Sophia and Liam's night there without Sophia knowing he was gambling there.I think everyone agrees that Liam was set up. Whether he was sabotaged or not, we don't know, but it's pretty clear that the casino allowed something that should never have been allowed. Whether L&P intends for it to be bad luck for Liam, or active sabotage, is anyone's guess. Personally, I think Liam was sabotaged by Morello in order to get to Sophia. Liam was never going to leave the casino without losing big.
I have already drawn attention to the fact that during the dialogue between Don Morello and the Parkers, Don used the concept of Liam's debts, naming debts in the plural. Sofia, like many here on the forum, did not pay attention to this, essential in my opinion, detail.That would be the quickest setup in history since Don Morollo meets Sophia the same night Liam bet and lost the house on the same night. There has to be more to this story than one night. I wonder if Liam was visiting the Casino prior to Sophia and Liam's night there without Sophia knowing he was gambling there.
So from what you pointed out and what we observed so far is that Liam may have a lying problem now too. So I guess we can say that Liam's marriage may be in trouble not from gambling but from lying if you choose this path.I have already drawn attention to the fact that during the dialogue between Don Morello and the Parkers, Don used the concept of Liam's debts, naming debts in the plural. Sofia, like many here on the forum, did not pay attention to this, essential in my opinion, detail.
I think this is an important aspect.
But this is worse, means that Liam has brought his wife into the wolves' den on purpose.I have already drawn attention to the fact that during the dialogue between Don Morello and the Parkers, Don used the concept of Liam's debts, naming debts in the plural. Sofia, like many here on the forum, did not pay attention to this, essential in my opinion, detail.
I think this is an important aspect.
The only question is, how much does the L&P see the mafia as dangerous wolves? At the moment, L&P portrays Don as a man of honor and word. But usually in reality, this does not apply to victims! The Mafia gets everything it wants at any cost. In our case, while some kind of comical, funny story is taking shape.But this is worse, means that Liam has brought his wife into the wolves' den on purpose.
or just a bad traslateI have already drawn attention to the fact that during the dialogue between Don Morello and the Parkers, Don used the concept of Liam's debts, naming debts in the plural. Sofia, like many here on the forum, did not pay attention to this, essential in my opinion, detail.
I think this is an important aspect.
We can clarify this only after Don's next meeting with the Parkers.or just a bad traslate
I see your point, but I think the story is allowed to take some liberties with timelines. A quick setup does not break my suspense of disbelief. God knows we need to speed this game up, not find ways to low it down.That would be the quickest setup in history since Don Morollo meets Sophia the same night Liam bet and lost the house on the same night. There has to be more to this story than one night. I wonder if Liam was visiting the Casino prior to Sophia and Liam's night there without Sophia knowing he was gambling there.
I don't think L&P intends on portraying Liam in such a negative light. So far I get the impression that L&P wants to write Liam as a loving and flawed husband. I do not think that includes making Liam into some sort of habitual liar. In the end I think L&P wants Liam to be a sympathetic character to the audience if/when Sophia cheats.So from what you pointed out and what we observed so far is that Liam may have a lying problem now too. So I guess we can say that Liam's marriage may be in trouble not from gambling but from lying if you choose this path.
Most people believe that the Lying/Cover-up is the worst part.
That was my takeaway. I took it as something similar to "math vs maths". Debt or debts, neither is really wrong but a native speaker would only use "debt".or just a bad traslate
You can have some liberties with the timelines or time-lapses as long as it makes sense on the other end. If we find out down the road that Liam's has been visiting the casino without Sophia's knowing this then the explanation becomes clear. I'm replaying the Casino Don Morello scene again to see if I missed the word Debts.I see your point, but I think the story is allowed to take some liberties with timelines. A quick setup does not break my suspense of disbelief. God knows we need to speed this game up, not find ways to low it down.
I don't think L&P intends on portraying Liam in such a negative light. So far I get the impression that L&P wants to write Liam as a loving and flawed husband. I do not think that includes making Liam into some sort of habitual liar. In the end I think L&P wants Liam to be a sympathetic character to the audience if/when Sophia cheats.
That was my takeaway. I took it as something similar to "math vs maths". Debt or debts, neither is really wrong but a native speaker would only use "debt".
Don uses the word debt until the very last part of the conversation where debts and all of them were used. So then the logical conclusion would be Liam was visiting that casino more than once, which means he was hiding and lying to Sophia or Don Morello has no intention of letting Sophia go that easy.You can have some liberties with the timelines or time-lapses as long as it makes sense on the other end. If we find out down the road that Liam's has been visiting the casino without Sophia's knowing this then the explanation becomes clear. I'm replaying the Casino Don Morello scene again to see if I missed the word Debts.
Right now, the way he is telling the story has some major gaps and realistic issues or maybe this is just happing that way because of a loss in translation issue.
Everything we learned so far, could be a bad translation from his previous translation from German to English. His last version update appeared to fix most of these issues as the grammar and use of slang words improve significantly, but it was only for that version update. He would need to go back and correct the other grammar, sentence structure, and slang at another time from the other previous versions.