are you serious? I gave a number of examples in my first and other posts, but you just chose to dismiss it.
I've talked about the legal age of sex in 3 different counties and how they look, they do not look 11-13 at all. I've even admitted that the youngest is a problem, but nah, according you you, I gave no examples or backed up my argument at all.
In the UK, you can be in high school at 16, 17 and 18. FACT
In the US, you can leave high school between 14 and 18, therefore all of them in Sophia's class could be 17 and 18 FACT
it is all good and well disagreeing with me but saying I haven't given examples comes across as weak.
I'm done with this and even predicted in my first post the reaction I would get, at this point the desperation by some to tag the tutor boys as shota is a bit disturbing.
So you think they look 16-18? I mean that's one way to lie to yourself I guess. Kids half the size of Sophia and any other adult in the game are 16-18. Huh. Same applies to Dylan and all the other teenagers, but is even more apparent looking at the Myers kids. Now you're going to argue that people come in different shapes and sizes, right?
You said it's "obvious" that they're not underage and whatnot, but your only arguments are "Age of consent in country/state X is X, therefore calling them shota boys is unjustified.", and "They do not look underage.". They do not look underage? Are you looking at DoL renders or something?
my point is they shouldn't be called shota boys because they're not and that is a fact. For every sign that they are, there are other signs that they aren't
"they shouldn't be called shota boys because they're not and that is a fact."
Where are those facts? Saying the age of consent somewhere on our planet is X doesn't make it a fact.
"For every sign that they are, there are other signs that they aren't."
What signs? Them acting like toddlers? Them being the size of 12 year old boys? Their facial features reminiscent of elementary school kids? Them being completely oblivious to anything sexual, even their own bodies regardless of a sheltered life?
You are quite literally denying that L&P is purposefully portraying them as little kids. Even a first-grader is more aware than they are. Pretty clear what L&P is trying to do with this route.
the tutor job is part of why he just lost his patron
You are admitting that L&P has lost his Patreon because of this content. CSAM. Which, by the way, is not "part of" why he got banned. It is why he got banned, period. You also said L&P failed to "explain them properly". Again, you're just lying to yourself. He explained them perfectly well. He wanted them to look and act like children but for legal reasons has written them to be highschoolers. Without any of those rules on Patreon, he would have most likely straight up said they're 12 year old middleschoolers or some shit. To top it all off, he's now taken this stuff out of the game entirely, further reinforcing the idea that this stuff is "shota", or CSAM as most platforms would describe this kind of content.
It's the same reason he aged up Dylan and other characters, and still they look like teenagers. Just look at the pajama party of PD13. Dylan looks like a child next to Amy and the other girls. Their boyfriends look of age. Dylan is dwarfed by any of them. Again, the Myers kids look even younger, and purposefully so. He wants them all to look like kids and teenagers in AWAM because this shit sells. There is a reason L&P kept making characters look of age in DoL for years, because in AWAM they're not and even L&P knows it. So much for your "not explaining them well" nonsense.
Saying this isn't shota is straight up lying. By the way, I'm not trying to kink shame here. To each their own, but this hypocrite behavior is ridiculous.
