I keep asking myself, why do I keep revisiting “Adored by the Devil”? Its animations are only so-so, the dialogue is decent but nothing to write home about. What is it? I think I’ve finally figured it out. With the adult content, it does everything right. I’ll explain what I mean with examples of doing it wrong.
Wrong: Characters fall into bed with each with barely a “how do you do?”
Right: Characters build up believable relationships before having sex. It doesn’t have to be multiple dates or even all that gradual. It just has to be believable. It has to be something that, when you roll it around in your head, you think, “Yeah, given the circumstances, that’s probably what would happen.”
Wrong: Animations but no static renders. Just one animation after another.
Right: Animations connected by static renders. Characters don’t just appear naked in missionary. They enter the room, they talk, they embrace, they kiss, they begin to lose clothes, their hands start wandering… you get the idea. Static renders matter. They build up the tension before you reach the animations. The best authors don’t really need animations which can end up distracting from the build-up they’ve achieved through dialogue and renders.
Wrong: No kissing.
Right: Kissing! Unless there’s a reason, like the love interest is a sex worker or something, there’s just no excuse. Kiss before sex. Kiss during sex. Kiss after sex. Kissing matters.
Wrong: Every relationship is the same. One seen of kissing, then later a handjob, then a blow job, then sex.
Right: Not everyone goes at the same pace. The experienced vampire who gets aroused from drinking blood isn’t going to wait 3 dates to jump your bones, and the virgin you just met isn’t going to drop to her knees the moment she sees your cock.
I could go on but this covers the gist. The story is engrossing, the characters are unique and interesting, the world building is well done, and the sex scenes are phenomenal. A prime example of how being able to render high-quality, high frame-rate animations is not sufficient to make a sex scene worth watching unless everything else surrounding it is up to par as well.
Wrong: Characters fall into bed with each with barely a “how do you do?”
Right: Characters build up believable relationships before having sex. It doesn’t have to be multiple dates or even all that gradual. It just has to be believable. It has to be something that, when you roll it around in your head, you think, “Yeah, given the circumstances, that’s probably what would happen.”
Wrong: Animations but no static renders. Just one animation after another.
Right: Animations connected by static renders. Characters don’t just appear naked in missionary. They enter the room, they talk, they embrace, they kiss, they begin to lose clothes, their hands start wandering… you get the idea. Static renders matter. They build up the tension before you reach the animations. The best authors don’t really need animations which can end up distracting from the build-up they’ve achieved through dialogue and renders.
Wrong: No kissing.
Right: Kissing! Unless there’s a reason, like the love interest is a sex worker or something, there’s just no excuse. Kiss before sex. Kiss during sex. Kiss after sex. Kissing matters.
Wrong: Every relationship is the same. One seen of kissing, then later a handjob, then a blow job, then sex.
Right: Not everyone goes at the same pace. The experienced vampire who gets aroused from drinking blood isn’t going to wait 3 dates to jump your bones, and the virgin you just met isn’t going to drop to her knees the moment she sees your cock.
I could go on but this covers the gist. The story is engrossing, the characters are unique and interesting, the world building is well done, and the sex scenes are phenomenal. A prime example of how being able to render high-quality, high frame-rate animations is not sufficient to make a sex scene worth watching unless everything else surrounding it is up to par as well.