AI Porn Generation Project - Need Feedback

[sacramento]

Hi everyone!

I'm developing an app with aim to generate porn based on visitors preferences.

Long-term goal is: you won't have to search for porn anymore, you can just pick between options on my website and each time you will receive unique, realistic scene according to your specifications.

Please check out the images down below and let me know if they are decent enough.

 

[F4C430]

Long-term goal is: you won't have to search for porn anymore, you can just pick between options on my website and each time you will receive unique, realistic scene according to your specifications.

Among which options? Any options i want? Or only the ones you decide to be available? Only realistic or will other styles also be included?

Also, will this kill my interest in porn since in theory i can have anything i want at anytime, which could end up making all of it boring?

 

[bethrezen0]

and what would be the difference between your project and other websites that provide the same thing described here ? I could like go to novel.ai and already generate anything i want and receive a unique pictures. Will yours be free while providing same quality of generation ?
Also, is this

I'm developing an app

or

on my website

So uh... Which is it ?

BTW, you say porn, but presenting just clothed women, just standing there.

 

[_retorik_]

I like the images in general but it seems to have a bit of trouble around nose/mouth area ...

Do you think your site as a resource for creators or as "pornhub competitor"?

 

[anne O'nymous]

Long-term goal is: you won't have to search for porn anymore, you can just pick between options on my website and each time you will receive unique, realistic scene according to your specifications.

You understand that the appeal in real porn is the fact that precisely it's real, right ?

As decent as those images can be, and they are the most decent I've seen so far, they are just pretty images, not fap material, precisely because they aren't real.
And of course there's the usual constancy issue. I guess that you grouped the girls because they are expected to be the same, but they aren't. And this add to the unreal side.

 

[Omar95]

You understand that the appeal in real porn is the fact that precisely it's real, right ?

As decent as those images can be, and they are the most decent I've seen so far, they are just pretty images, not fap material, precisely because they aren't real.
And of course there's the usual constancy issue. I guess that you grouped the girls because they are expected to be the same, but they aren't. And this add to the unreal side.

True, I agree 100%. It's nice to look at, but not "unzip my pants" nice. It just doesn't hit the same, at least for me.

 

[Artiour]

have you ever seen AI art in

You must be registered to see the links

?
the realistic in your images is good but sorry they aren't decent enough.
here are some examples of decent imo:

You must be registered to see the links

You must be registered to see the links

I don't know what's missing in yours but I think you need to play a little more with your prompts, for example import a little information from photography and modeling fields.

 

[sacramento]

have you ever seen AI art in

You must be registered to see the links

?
the realistic in your images is good but sorry they aren't decent enough.
here are some examples of decent imo:

You must be registered to see the links

You must be registered to see the links

I don't know what's missing in yours but I think you need to play a little more with your prompts, for example import a little information from photography and modeling fields.

You understand that the appeal in real porn is the fact that precisely it's real, right ?

As decent as those images can be, and they are the most decent I've seen so far, they are just pretty images, not fap material, precisely because they aren't real.
And of course there's the usual constancy issue. I guess that you grouped the girls because they are expected to be the same, but they aren't. And this add to the unreal side.

Among which options? Any options i want? Or only the ones you decide to be available? Only realistic or will other styles also be included?

Also, will this kill my interest in porn since in theory i can have anything i want at anytime, which could end up making all of it boring?

Hey everyone. Beta is launched - please google: pornderful.ai and it will pop up. Any feedback is appreciated.

It's still in beta, once it's live, i'll open official thread here.

 

[tunboino]

AI Woman > rest

 

[JeFawk]

So I generated, but I don't see any menu or regenerate button. Do I need to go through all of those settings back again to generate 1 more with 1 different setting?
There is the boost button which just alters the current ones.

 

[sacramento]

So I generated, but I don't see any menu or regenerate button. Do I need to go through all of those settings back again to generate 1 more with 1 different setting?
There is the boost button which just alters the current ones.

Click on tags, and it will bring you back to the settings you previosuly picked.

Now, just click generate image again and it will generate it with the same settings.

 

[Doorknob22]

If this is indeed generated on the spot, I believe these can be the first steps in the future of porn. Next steps would be allowing users to use descriptions instead of dropdown and tags. Good luck!

 

[Artiour]

this is really something

 

[Artiour]

I know this is pretty early but I have some suggestion:
I seen the use of these [] or these () in some modules or tools (dont know much about this) to make the AI focus more or less on a word in the prompt, could something alike be implemented
some tags don't work properly like full body view it gives you a portrait so I thought this could be useful
aside from that the whole thing look good and promising

 

[wtp-support]

do you have any site ?

 

[Artiour]

do you have any site ?

he provided one
pornderful.ai

 

[anne O'nymous]

I guess that if you are into girls with

You must be registered to see the links

(and WTF with her right leg ?) or that know how to do

You must be registered to see the links

, it's the perfect site to go.

 

[pepplez]

...or that know how to do

You must be registered to see the links

, it's the perfect site to go.

LMAO, a new fetish is born? Reminds me of the good old Chuck jokes.

"They say under Chuck Norris' beard there is not a chin. Only another fist."

 

[sacramento]

If this is indeed generated on the spot, I believe these can be the first steps in the future of porn. Next steps would be allowing users to use descriptions instead of dropdown and tags. Good luck!

Thanks!

I guess that if you are into girls with

You must be registered to see the links

(and WTF with her right leg ?) or that know how to do

You must be registered to see the links

, it's the perfect site to go.

I don't know why would you out of 100 good images pick 2 that suck and post them here. Still have fun with those two haha.

If this is indeed generated on the spot, I believe these can be the first steps in the future of porn. Next steps would be allowing users to use descriptions instead of dropdown and tags. Good luck!

Yeah, it's a beginning. Thanks!

 

[anne O'nymous]

I don't know why would you out of 100 good images pick 2 that suck and post them here.

Because it's the issue with your site. I picked those two because they were kind of funny and popped out right from the front page, but there's way more, so many way more. A girl have legs behind her legs, another have a dick that pop out of her mouth, a guy have literally a dick that is two dicks long, one on top of the other, another have his dick in the middle of his buttock, and so on.
And this is still just by looking at the front page. When you look at them in a bigger size there's other anomalies that pop up. Half the images are more on the side of nightmares than dreams and are clearly mood killers, what lead to the question about the interest of your site.

You want to do it, good for you, I have nothing against it. But at least do it seriously and filter what you'll publish ; at least to remove the most obviously bad.
Bad buzz is still buzz. But is your goal to attire people who want to fap like you imply in the thread opening, or to be featured in 9gag first page and have a sub in reddit dedicated to mocking your images ? Because so far you are nearer to the second that to the first one.