So to recap, not only did you blatantly misrepresent the Pornhub-purge in order to downplay the significance of real rape footage being hosted on the site, you apparently also believe the appropriate term for such content is "bad porn".
I don't know what leads somebody to have such a cold disregard for rape victims, but you sound like a type of person who would find far more solidarity on Reddit than I would.
Nice strawman, but no. I said, explicitly, that every (real or fake) rape porn movie on porn hub is tagged for search. There's no point in having porn (or incest, or vore, or any other fringe fetish, if people can't find them). They didn't just delete those, they deleted every single non-verified user's content. Including 3D titties. The biggest thing getting nuked is actually the revenge porn (ex-gf) and porn without provable chain of custody. Both of which NYT hit directly, if you read through the articles.
This is a porn game website. It has games that glories in incest, degradation, girl training, and rape. If NYT decided to thrash this place, it would look almost exactly like what happened to PornHub. I like this place, so I'd rather not see it trashed by some trust-fundie with an axe to grind. And while PornHub (and Nutaku) are a pain in the ass, a bunch of other devs and streamers got their lives destroyed when MindGeek lost all support for payment providers. I assure you they'd happily do it to this place, and every other (non softcore) porn site on the internet if you give them a chance.
We can certainly discuss the rest of that, if you'd like to leave off the ad homine arguments.