Ok, version numbers are a terrible way to judge actual progress on development, especially when there's no consistency or standardization between development teams.
Now, this isn't progressing in a noticeable way, but that's down to the lack of progress not the version numbers.
Ok, version numbers are a terrible way to judge actual progress on development, especially when there's no consistency or standardization between development teams.
Now, this isn't progressing in a noticeable way, but that's down to the lack of progress not the version numbers.
Usually, if a Project is not abandoned, then Version 0.1 is a young Project.
I thought that the Project was less than one year old.
If the Project has only reached Version 0.1.3.6 in three years, then the Developer will complete it in 10,000 years at this rate... or they will get bored and abandon the Project in a few hundred years.
Usually, if a Project is not abandoned, then Version 0.1 is a young Project.
I thought that the Project was less than one year old.
If the Project has only reached Version 0.1.3.6 in three years, then the Developer will complete it in 10,000 years at this rate... or they will get bored and abandon the Project in a few hundred years.
Like I said, going only off version numbers is a bad idea. Some projects will go from version 0.1.x.x and straight to a version 1.0.0.0 release. There's no consistency in version numbering (that type is only one type of version numbering). I'm not saying this game has a good development speed / cycle, just that version numbers aren't reliable to determine development state.
