It is probably kind of a stupid question, but still... After some experiments, I managed to make some dForce breast work, the result are not always perfect, but not too bad and are more realistic than many morphs. However, I also want to use breastacular, because I like the various options it has.
But I realised that breastacular replaces completely the part of the mesh with the breast, which means, the simulation is lost.
I guess one way could be to do the simulation, see the results, then try to use the morhs that come with breastacular itself (and evenutally if needed mesh grabber) to reproduce roughly the shape that comes from the dforce simulation - but that seems like a lot of work and for results maybe not that good.
Has anybody ever managed to use breastacular with one of the various dForce products for breasts simulation having breastacular adapt at least in part to the shape of what is below it ?
But I realised that breastacular replaces completely the part of the mesh with the breast, which means, the simulation is lost.
I guess one way could be to do the simulation, see the results, then try to use the morhs that come with breastacular itself (and evenutally if needed mesh grabber) to reproduce roughly the shape that comes from the dforce simulation - but that seems like a lot of work and for results maybe not that good.
Has anybody ever managed to use breastacular with one of the various dForce products for breasts simulation having breastacular adapt at least in part to the shape of what is below it ?