(Fair warning, I got long winded. Read if you have the time. TLDR: It's a great VN).
Eternal Torment has a number of violent rape scenes, release date, and lack of practical knowledge working against it. Explaining the last item, the VN is "food for thought", at a level where anyone can postulate on "eternity" and draw their own conclusions, but technical means are not employed (much of it is up to you). If you accept this as a good thing (I do), then only 2 barriers remain.
First, whatever the "average VN audience" in the "west" is, I believe we can agree that "they" don't want to see children being physically abused in brutal fashion, even if it's fiction. Second the VN is almost 15 years old, not that bad, but the limitations will be noticeable in terms of visuals, sound and writing. As for negatives concerning practical knowledge, the VN is "food for thought", not "thought provoking". I don't need to tell you that eternity is the furthest thing from anyone's mind, and when that's not the case, existential dread tends to be the reaction.
In other words, you intellectual curiosity might be stimulated, but the amount of information that can be applied to your own experience, and probably generate greater interest, is reduced. It's a great VN, held back by its very nature, and more than one type of contemporary idiosyncrasy.
Who should read it then? A more tolerant and inquisitive kind of reader, that has no problem becoming engrossed in conjecture. Someone who can stop for a bit while reading, and imagine the ramifications of a "meaningless" concept. Lastly, Eternal Torment is no slouch in the "feelings and their payout department", it's just that a lot of it is negative. Intellectual and emotional reward in one VN, hence the score.
Positive:
- Positing on eternity - How much you can draw from the author's words, is the key to enjoyment. Before that however, there is less speculative material. For instance, you could easily gather that ideas of personal responsibility (accountability for one's actions) are important in Eternal torment (not derived, integral basically). This is not the main approach though.
Realizing that living forever is scarier than dying (can't elaborate here, think you past the heat death of the universe)***. That the "soul" needs nourishment, even if the body doesn't (it's the "little" everyday things). That cruelty or altruism would be indistinguishable in the long run (all meaningless eventually)... And more unworkable material. It's the journey of an immortal, made better by individual perspective.
*** I wouldn't worry too much about it for obvious reasons. Not so obvious reasons, would include the universe being any sort of model isolated system to begin with.
Neutral:
- Bad endings (more like bad routes) - It's on purpose, the characters' suffering is supposed to extend to the reader. Sadly, it's 2025 for me, and being locked to many bad endings from a choice 3 chapters ago (there's 5) is a "hard pill to swallow". Another thing is the actual justification for the bad endings, which incurs spoilers, being the bare minimum to keep plot cohesion, and coming very late in the game (last segment). It's on neutral because it's deliberate, and the structure of the VN is never addressed directly by the author.
Negative:
- H-Scenes - I don't believe VNs need a justification to have H-scenes. I believe Eternal Torment needs a justification to have more callous H-scenes. The idea is hardship breeding change, strength of character. Same thing as a war allowing for great progress after its end. Unfortunately, the author forgot that the protagonist (and many others), lives for hundreds (more) of years, and still thinks within human dimensions. All the rape and torture being necessary for growth and the correct resolution, is an underhand device. If you establish that the human mind is unaltered, they had lots of time to grow strong naturally, no one stays the same for a 100 years (rape or no rape). It's shock value, no more no less.
This could have been a pure love title named "Eternal Bliss", and have optional dark scenes, the "universal shenanigans" would still be solved. All of the misery being necessary, is not true or logical, and the negative could have been avoided by declaration of design (instead of patchwork excuses at the end).
Score: 8/10. Think Dies Irae, with a smaller scope focused on "individual", and bigger on the theoretical side of things. Something else to consider, the scenario lost value over the years, some of its inspirations are more common nowadays. I've decided against it affecting the score. With that out of the way: If the 18+ content, release date related matters, and practical application of knowledge are not an issue, this is highly recommended. Just remember that the half of the "workload" falls on your shoulders.
Eternal Torment has a number of violent rape scenes, release date, and lack of practical knowledge working against it. Explaining the last item, the VN is "food for thought", at a level where anyone can postulate on "eternity" and draw their own conclusions, but technical means are not employed (much of it is up to you). If you accept this as a good thing (I do), then only 2 barriers remain.
First, whatever the "average VN audience" in the "west" is, I believe we can agree that "they" don't want to see children being physically abused in brutal fashion, even if it's fiction. Second the VN is almost 15 years old, not that bad, but the limitations will be noticeable in terms of visuals, sound and writing. As for negatives concerning practical knowledge, the VN is "food for thought", not "thought provoking". I don't need to tell you that eternity is the furthest thing from anyone's mind, and when that's not the case, existential dread tends to be the reaction.
In other words, you intellectual curiosity might be stimulated, but the amount of information that can be applied to your own experience, and probably generate greater interest, is reduced. It's a great VN, held back by its very nature, and more than one type of contemporary idiosyncrasy.
Who should read it then? A more tolerant and inquisitive kind of reader, that has no problem becoming engrossed in conjecture. Someone who can stop for a bit while reading, and imagine the ramifications of a "meaningless" concept. Lastly, Eternal Torment is no slouch in the "feelings and their payout department", it's just that a lot of it is negative. Intellectual and emotional reward in one VN, hence the score.
Positive:
- Positing on eternity - How much you can draw from the author's words, is the key to enjoyment. Before that however, there is less speculative material. For instance, you could easily gather that ideas of personal responsibility (accountability for one's actions) are important in Eternal torment (not derived, integral basically). This is not the main approach though.
Realizing that living forever is scarier than dying (can't elaborate here, think you past the heat death of the universe)***. That the "soul" needs nourishment, even if the body doesn't (it's the "little" everyday things). That cruelty or altruism would be indistinguishable in the long run (all meaningless eventually)... And more unworkable material. It's the journey of an immortal, made better by individual perspective.
*** I wouldn't worry too much about it for obvious reasons. Not so obvious reasons, would include the universe being any sort of model isolated system to begin with.
Neutral:
- Bad endings (more like bad routes) - It's on purpose, the characters' suffering is supposed to extend to the reader. Sadly, it's 2025 for me, and being locked to many bad endings from a choice 3 chapters ago (there's 5) is a "hard pill to swallow". Another thing is the actual justification for the bad endings, which incurs spoilers, being the bare minimum to keep plot cohesion, and coming very late in the game (last segment). It's on neutral because it's deliberate, and the structure of the VN is never addressed directly by the author.
Negative:
- H-Scenes - I don't believe VNs need a justification to have H-scenes. I believe Eternal Torment needs a justification to have more callous H-scenes. The idea is hardship breeding change, strength of character. Same thing as a war allowing for great progress after its end. Unfortunately, the author forgot that the protagonist (and many others), lives for hundreds (more) of years, and still thinks within human dimensions. All the rape and torture being necessary for growth and the correct resolution, is an underhand device. If you establish that the human mind is unaltered, they had lots of time to grow strong naturally, no one stays the same for a 100 years (rape or no rape). It's shock value, no more no less.
This could have been a pure love title named "Eternal Bliss", and have optional dark scenes, the "universal shenanigans" would still be solved. All of the misery being necessary, is not true or logical, and the negative could have been avoided by declaration of design (instead of patchwork excuses at the end).
Score: 8/10. Think Dies Irae, with a smaller scope focused on "individual", and bigger on the theoretical side of things. Something else to consider, the scenario lost value over the years, some of its inspirations are more common nowadays. I've decided against it affecting the score. With that out of the way: If the 18+ content, release date related matters, and practical application of knowledge are not an issue, this is highly recommended. Just remember that the half of the "workload" falls on your shoulders.