3 mentions of pornography in the act documents - try ai tools in future cause it super anoying to have to fact check for someone else who doesn't know whats in his own document that he is defending.
Try using your brain next time instead of relying on an external help that don't even have one.
Pornographic site being mentioned, in regard of the protection of minor, doesn't mean that pornography is addressed by the DSA as illegal content, like you implied absolutely not subtly.
Onlyfans, Pornhub,etc were reached out and whatever steps of compliance they are in is unknown at this time except for ID stuff.
It's perfectly known.
PornHub was one of the three first porn platforms to be qualified as "big online platform",
You must be registered to see the links
. As usual for them, they were relatively vocal about this, including a public release of their semester DSA
You must be registered to see the links
You must be registered to see the links
, following
You must be registered to see the links
. This while contesting the qualification,
You must be registered to see the links
, and not agreeing to really comply to the DSA, what led them to
You must be registered to see the links
.
As for OnlyFans, they qualify under
You must be registered to see the links
, but aren't yet officially qualified and, therefore, only have to comply by default, without actually facing penalties if they don't goes further than a basic age check and content moderation; something they already comply with since around 3 years, so before the DSA.
By the way, the day were F95Zone will qualify to the current threshold, I'll honestly open a champagne bottle in
F95,
Sam and the whole team, honour. I mean, so far to be qualified as "big online platform", and therefore having to strictly follow the DSA, you need at least 50 employees
(F95zone have 0) and US$ 11 millions in annual revenue
(F95zone just cover its operating cost that is largely below US$ 1 millions).
Yes - Again I highly recommend AI cause it will fact check with what I am saying.
And again, using your own brain isn't optional, and even less trying to understand what you read, that is mandatory.
“‘Illegal content’ means any information which, in itself or in relation to an activity, including the sale of products or provision of services, is not in compliance with Union law or the law of any Member State which is in compliance with Union law, irrespective of the precise subject matter or nature of that law.”
There's a difference between the definition of a notion, here "illegal activity", and its field of application. The definition apply at EU level, the field of application at country level; EU members' Law can be stricter than the EU's one, but this part will only apply to their country.
"Providers of hosting services shall put mechanisms in place to allow any individual or entity to notify them of the presence on their service of specific items of information that the individual or entity considers to be illegal content. Those mechanisms shall be easy to access, user-friendly, and allow for the submission of notices exclusively by electronic means."
What doesn't even address what I said.
Correct - they will flag it [read previous quote] and bring it to the platform with common sense will promptly delete it and ban user without even looking into it because of threats of fines.
No, they'll comply to it because it's a request that come for a Justice court. And the fact is that, whoever you are, whatever you do, and whatever the reason, when a Justice court give you an order, it's highly recommended to comply. This even if you also decide to challenge the said order in Justice.
These are platforms that have over 45,000 monthly european citizens and/or marketplace which most things would fall under.
The threshold for most part of the DSA isn't based on the number of monthly European visitors.
It's also not "citizens", but "residents"; a citizen have to comply to the Law of its residence country, while not being subject to the law of his citizenship one. The last part modulo less than a handful exceptions; sex with minor generally being the only one.
- Conducting risk assessments to identify and mitigate systemic risks, such as the dissemination of illegal pornographic content or non-consensual imagery.
- Implementing measures to address these risks, such as enhanced content moderation and algorithm transparency.
What people like you fail to understand is that countries does not "started to". They decided to enforce what their Law ask for since near to two decades. So, yeah, there's new laws that appear, but it's not because they ask for new compliance; it's because they decided stronger incentive to comply, this while also defining more finely the means to reach that compliance.
Age check, by example, is mandatory in almost all the world since before you started to use Internet, but so far all sites relied on a weak approach that worth absolutely nothing. It's not without reason that it's a recurring joke that, each year, people who reach 15-16yo talk about, as if it was the discovery of the century; "oh, look what I found. If I select a different birth year than my actual one, I can access +18 content. Ah ah ah, I'm such a hacker."
Same for content moderation.
If the biggest online platforms were complying since the starts, especially when it come to the content moderation, we wouldn't be where we now are.
You must be registered to see the links
, answering "no" isn't the best way to keep the Law as lax as it is. This especially when the same request get the same answer when it come again later, once it's established that
You must be registered to see the links
, and the videos uploaded without her consent.
But this, only people who use their brain can know and understand it. People who think that they are smart because they ask generative content AIs to think for them, will never know, and even less understand, the reality. They'll just live in an utopian world defined by their own dreams, comforted in it by their own cognitive limitations and the implied inhability to write prompts that would give them an accurate answer that overpass their own bias.
