Recommending FUTA ON MALE content collection(list)

[lolnolol69]

The implication here is that I’m somehow the issue for calling out an issue. I’m not omitting the original topic, sir.

No I'm implying that you're a hypocrite and a troll.

 

[yolo4jesus420]

does anyone have futagenerators works?

 

[The Shape]

No I'm implying that you're a hypocrite and a troll.

I don’t care for your personal opinion regarding my character, sir, not in the slightest. It’s immaterial to me. Nor do I care about the majority’s consensus. I don’t go along to get along out of fear of being shunned. I’m going to state the truth regardless and I’m not particularly worried on what the consequences may be. I can articulate quite clearly my thought process and beliefs; can you?

The name calling, attempt at castigation, labeling, and glaringly obvious, and excuse me, childlike manipulation tactics that is the equivalent to “I know you are but what am I?!” to silence when someone has shown nothing but respect only displays your ability (or lack thereof) and frustration to disprove the actual point and your immaturity, so you lash out. This is cognitive dissonance in real time; you may have some growing up to do, sir. The inability for anyone who has answered me in a combative way to address and tackle the substance of my points does not go unnoticed. You’ve seen a opinion that does not resonate with you, and, I’d presume, felt encompassed your behavior and chose to stick cute labels onto me to preserve and shield your behavior instead of being able to challenge the transparent points being made. This is evident in both the disregard and omission of my reasoning and manipulative framing of my stance that was candidly stated directly to you — so, I’ll ask again, and my hypothesis is that you’ll predictably and purposefully cherry pick what you deem the lowest-hanging fruit to frame the conversation as you see fit to protect your emotional override of logic telling you you’re being attacked (even when you are not) as you have done before:

Was Dr. King the problem? Or were the lynchers the problem?

 

[futanon]

This entire thread has become a cesspool of sorts involving unrelated childlike drama, discourse that completely omits the original topic, and unfunny, irrelevant memes that clog up the entire forum.

Can we return to the root reason of why this thread was made to begin with?

new here?

this is a reocurring thing, you'll get used to it

 

[Icy Frost]

I don’t care for your personal opinion regarding my character, sir, not in the slightest. It’s immaterial to me. Nor do I care about the majority’s consensus. I don’t go along to get along out of fear of being shunned. I’m going to state the truth regardless and I’m not particularly worried on what the consequences may be. I can articulate quite clearly my thought process and beliefs; can you?

The name calling, attempt at castigation, labeling, and glaringly obvious, and excuse me, childlike manipulation tactics that is the equivalent to “I know you are but what am I?!” to silence when someone has shown nothing but respect only displays your ability (or lack thereof) and frustration to disprove the actual point and your immaturity, so you lash out. This is cognitive dissonance in real time; you may have some growing up to do, sir. The inability for anyone who has answered me in a combative way to address and tackle the substance of my points does not go unnoticed. You’ve seen a opinion that does not resonate with you, and, I’d presume, felt encompassed your behavior and chose to stick cute labels onto me to preserve and shield your behavior instead of being able to challenge the transparent points being made. This is evident in both the disregard and omission of my reasoning and manipulative framing of my stance that was candidly stated directly to you — so, I’ll ask again, and my hypothesis is that you’ll predictably and purposefully cherry pick what you deem the lowest-hanging fruit to frame the conversation as you see fit to protect your emotional override of logic telling you you’re being attacked (even when you are not) as you have done before:

Was Dr. King the problem? Or were the lynchers the problem?

 

[DN8R]

That negates exactly nothing of what I’ve said, sir (or ma’am). In fact, I’d contend that you have only proven my point further. A dedicated, tailor-made anything is meant to serve that exact purpose. The specificity of it is in place and established for a reason. You choosing to dismiss the matter is entirely up to you, sir.

“The thread isn't sacrificing content for arguments and memes, there's just nothing else to do.”

Not only are you, yourself, admitting to, at the least, seeing an influx of unnecessary posts, you seem to not realize you have conceded your point within the same breath. I give gratitude to you strengthening my stance for me, sir.

A drought should reflect in the amount of posts being made as well, it should not exacerbate, again, posts of petty drama and memes that have no root connection regarding to the inception and reasoning for this forum. If there is no content to post, why are there posts being made at all that have no correlation whatsoever to said specific forum?

A drought in the drug trade results in less of everything: less drugs, less money in circulation, less turf wars, less dealers, and less governmental resources fixed towards surveillance being that everything has come to a halt besides the exacerbation in demand. And that isn’t what you see here, sir. There are plenty of requests still, sure — yet it is still overwhelmingly overran by pages upon pages of immaterial matters that are irrelevant to the reason you and I both are here.

A novice to the drug game that has come to do legitimate business during a drought season does not go to a dealer with the expectation of said dealer’s “employees” offering him advice on his wardrobe for hours upon hours simply because his supply is more limited than usual. No sir. The individual came for merchandise. And they will logically come to the conclusion that the dealer and his operation is unserious if he allows his employees to conducts themselves in that manner.

Ahh yes, molesting a thesaurus to larp as an intellectual on a pirate porn forum. Very 2000's retro of you. How many fedoras do you own, and have you named them yet?

I'm not challenging your point, I'm telling you to stop acting like self-appointed moral authority, sit down and stick to lurking. You're good at that.

The incredible irony of you complaining about derailing the thread while going off about MLK and drug dealers to soothe your wounded pride isn't lost on anyone here. Be the change you want to see, champ.

 

[scaryterry19]

I don’t care for your personal opinion regarding my character, sir, not in the slightest. It’s immaterial to me. Nor do I care about the majority’s consensus. I don’t go along to get along out of fear of being shunned. I’m going to state the truth regardless and I’m not particularly worried on what the consequences may be. I can articulate quite clearly my thought process and beliefs; can you?

The name calling, attempt at castigation, labeling, and glaringly obvious, and excuse me, childlike manipulation tactics that is the equivalent to “I know you are but what am I?!” to silence when someone has shown nothing but respect only displays your ability (or lack thereof) and frustration to disprove the actual point and your immaturity, so you lash out. This is cognitive dissonance in real time; you may have some growing up to do, sir. The inability for anyone who has answered me in a combative way to address and tackle the substance of my points does not go unnoticed. You’ve seen a opinion that does not resonate with you, and, I’d presume, felt encompassed your behavior and chose to stick cute labels onto me to preserve and shield your behavior instead of being able to challenge the transparent points being made. This is evident in both the disregard and omission of my reasoning and manipulative framing of my stance that was candidly stated directly to you — so, I’ll ask again, and my hypothesis is that you’ll predictably and purposefully cherry pick what you deem the lowest-hanging fruit to frame the conversation as you see fit to protect your emotional override of logic telling you you’re being attacked (even when you are not) as you have done before:

Was Dr. King the problem? Or were the lynchers the problem?

 

[GrabberWalkie]

View attachment 5509043

I wish he made some longer videos, like he used to make back in the Sex Villa days.

 

[Icarus Media]

Apparently it's 'dearth' and I just learned a new word today, yay.

My bad, I misspelt it.

 

[prozaq]

Many new updates of VLDstudios

You must be registered to see the links

 

[The Shape]

Ahh yes, molesting a thesaurus to larp as an intellectual on a pirate porn forum. Very 2000's retro of you. How many fedoras do you own, and have you named them yet?

I'm not challenging your point, I'm telling you to stop acting like self-appointed moral authority, sit down and stick to lurking. You're good at that.

The incredible irony of you complaining about derailing the thread while going off about MLK and drug dealers to soothe your wounded pride isn't lost on anyone here. Be the change you want to see, champ.

“Ahh yes, molesting a thesaurus to larp as an intellectual on a pirate porn forum. Very 2000's retro of you. How many fedoras do you own, and have you named them yet?”

I own exactly one, sir, and it has no name. It’s sky blue. Now could you help me identify the correlation with this comment and the substance of the conversation at hand? You frame your own self as one being intimidated by intellect and resort to playground insults middle-school aged children hurl. You are actively promoting anti-intellectualism whilst taking an unfounded and flat-out foolish position of reveling in ignorance. Do you see how you have to name call instead of attack what’s being stated? I certainly do. Those are qualities of a small man, not a respectable one. In the real world, sir, more sensitive ideas of yours will be challenged; I’d suggest that you not behave in the manner you currently are over trivial disagreements such as this. You will be fine. And yet still, does this negate anything I have said?

“I'm not challenging your point, I'm telling you to stop acting like self-appointed moral authority, sit down and stick to lurking. You're good at that.”

Are you, sir, or anyone else for that matter, going to make me? The same way you share your opinions, as can I. And you being belligerent due to an opinion is immaterial to me. That is your decision. I am going to say what I feel to whomever, whenever. Does this, again, negate anything that I have said? A mirror is being held up to you and you do not like the reflection. You will be okay. You’ve espoused it yourself sir, this is an online porn pirating thread.

“The incredible irony of you complaining about derailing the thread while going off about MLK and drug dealers to soothe your wounded pride isn't lost on anyone here. Be the change you want to see, champ.”

I don’t find anything ironic about it. The clear intention of those analogies were to dismantle your misunderstanding of how a colloquial drought works and how pointing out a problem does not make said person the problem for shining a light upon it. Is that more digestible for you? Do you know what analogies are utilized for, sir? Do you know how evidence and logic are both tools utilized to further strengthen and drive home a central idea, sir? An intelligent person can articulate their ideas, however uncomfortable the conversation may be; and this is far from that, (it may be uncomfortable to you) this is an adult (I’d hope) behaving in the manner of a child throwing a temper tantrum and believing name calling gives you digital credibility because someone has the audacity to criticize something you clearly hold dear that has no bearing on actual life.

Like it or not sir, you have maturing to do.

 

[The Shape]

View attachment 5512124
View attachment 5511660

Thank you for further proving my point. I see attacks on bettering oneself and education have fooled individuals into believing succumbing to one’s lower self is something to commend and hold dear. To argue with a fool is to be one. You two have a nice day (or night).

 

[Icarus Media]

And now back to on topic:

 

[TheHoleyDiver]

“Ahh yes, molesting a thesaurus to larp as an intellectual on a pirate porn forum. Very 2000's retro of you. How many fedoras do you own, and have you named them yet?”

I own exactly one, sir, and it has no name. It’s sky blue. Now could you help me identify the correlation with this comment and the substance of the conversation at hand? You frame your own self as one being intimidated by intellect and resort to playground insults middle-school aged children hurl. You are actively promoting anti-intellectualism whilst taking an unfounded and flat-out foolish position of reveling in ignorance. Do you see how you have to name call instead of attack what’s being stated? I certainly do. Those are qualities of a small man, not a respectable one. In the real world, sir, more sensitive ideas of yours will be challenged; I’d suggest that you not behave in the manner you currently are over trivial disagreements such as this. You will be fine. And yet still, does this negate anything I have said?

“I'm not challenging your point, I'm telling you to stop acting like self-appointed moral authority, sit down and stick to lurking. You're good at that.”

Are you, sir, or anyone else for that matter, going to make me? The same way you share your opinions, as can I. And you being belligerent due to an opinion is immaterial to me. That is your decision. I am going to say what I feel to whomever, whenever. Does this, again, negate anything that I have said? A mirror is being held up to you and you do not like the reflection. You will be okay. You’ve espoused it yourself sir, this is an online porn pirating thread.

“The incredible irony of you complaining about derailing the thread while going off about MLK and drug dealers to soothe your wounded pride isn't lost on anyone here. Be the change you want to see, champ.”

I don’t find anything ironic about it. The clear intention of those analogies were to dismantle your misunderstanding of how a colloquial drought works and how pointing out a problem does not make said person the problem for shining a light upon it. Is that more digestible for you? Do you know what analogies are utilized for, sir? Do you know how evidence and logic are both tools utilized to further strengthen and drive home a central idea, sir? An intelligent person can articulate their ideas, however uncomfortable the conversation may be; and this is far from that, (it may be uncomfortable to you) this is an adult (I’d hope) behaving in the manner of a child throwing a temper tantrum and believing name calling gives you digital credibility because someone has the audacity to criticize something you clearly hold dear that has no bearing on actual life.

Like it or not sir, you have maturing to do.

The irony is twofold: not only has he contributed to the cesspool of "childlike drama" that he initially despised, it also looks like he found his keyboard yesterday.

Look my dude, no one here is in a moral authority. You're on a piracy forum for porn. So, let's just simmer down, let the kids throw sand in the sandbox, laugh at their idiocy from the confines of the our chairs, and move on when the content shows up. You trying to shout down those who are here doing dumb shit is only going to rile them up.

Last week, it's AI arguments. This week, man with two-dollar words tries to show a modicum of intelligence while arguing with the rabble, thereby exposing his true stupidity. I hesitate to change the channel.