How smart do you like your soon-to-be corrupted girls in games?
- Thread starter WindyGust
- Start date
- Jan 26, 2021
- 6,889
- 21,478
At least a MSc from a top university like Oxford of Harvard.
PhD preferred.
PhD preferred.
- Apr 17, 2021
- 27
- 32
- Jan 26, 2021
- 6,889
- 21,478
- Aug 23, 2020
- 2,530
- 12,155
Girls who are dumb are no fun. Naive can be fun, intelligent can be fun, but a girl who is just dumb as a box of rocks doesn't feel fun. The girls can be very sexual even before they're corrupted, but I don't want to see a dumb girl get tricked into becoming a slut.
- May 25, 2020
- 1,553
- 2,692
- Apr 17, 2021
- 27
- 32
- May 25, 2020
- 1,553
- 2,692
- May 25, 2020
- 1,553
- 2,692
- Aug 23, 2020
- 2,530
- 12,155
If you're looking to create your own corruption game I would suggest that you don't start with a character that is too sexually conservative. A girl/woman with experience can still be sexually naive. Too many games have women that begin so unbelievably conservative that it's hard to believe they even know what sex is. If you have a character like this, and you want a believable corruption storyline, then the timeframe for corrupting the woman becomes very long.
- Apr 17, 2021
- 27
- 32
I don't know what your IQ is or education. So none of this is meant as an insult to anyone.
It's purely a factual point on the topic at hand.
What I like vs what an author can write effectively are two different things.
One of the biggest places authors go wrong is trying to write above their means when it comes to characters.
It's the easiest area to spot the make mistakes.
A person with a 100 IQ can never write from the perspective of a person with a 150 IQ
They don't see the world the same. There isn't a damn thing they can ever do to change that.
Also education can play as much or more of a problem. A person who has no real understanding of complex topics is easily spotted when trying to write about it.
It's because they see things in a different manor they can solve more complex issues and problems. If you could simply imagine the way they think or see issue then you could solve the same problems they can. You can't.
If you are forced to write a character above your means there are a few tips to minimize that issue. Avoid discussing how they view or see an issue. Simply discuss them from a point of perception that shows their actions from an outside appearance.
The best answer is write characters in your own level use people you know as examples. In fact you can use researching how people would react to have a bit of fun. Get a few friends together at a diner or bar and talk about different situation and ask how they react in various situations. If you are fairly good at reading micro expressions and stuff you could learn something about friends you have they might not want to actually tell you. It would also help you gauge how truthful they are with their answers.
Granted I tend to use we researching believably of a plot, my friends don't think worse of my because they know me. You'll probably need your own reason they can accept so you don't get the creeper stare.
My Answer:
I like women who intelligent. I have yet to see a single game put out in the adult community that has ever managed to accurately represent someone that actually appears to be intelligent.
I would love for someone to write that game where the female character actually acts intelligent and it is believable.
It's purely a factual point on the topic at hand.
What I like vs what an author can write effectively are two different things.
One of the biggest places authors go wrong is trying to write above their means when it comes to characters.
It's the easiest area to spot the make mistakes.
A person with a 100 IQ can never write from the perspective of a person with a 150 IQ
They don't see the world the same. There isn't a damn thing they can ever do to change that.
Also education can play as much or more of a problem. A person who has no real understanding of complex topics is easily spotted when trying to write about it.
It's because they see things in a different manor they can solve more complex issues and problems. If you could simply imagine the way they think or see issue then you could solve the same problems they can. You can't.
If you are forced to write a character above your means there are a few tips to minimize that issue. Avoid discussing how they view or see an issue. Simply discuss them from a point of perception that shows their actions from an outside appearance.
The best answer is write characters in your own level use people you know as examples. In fact you can use researching how people would react to have a bit of fun. Get a few friends together at a diner or bar and talk about different situation and ask how they react in various situations. If you are fairly good at reading micro expressions and stuff you could learn something about friends you have they might not want to actually tell you. It would also help you gauge how truthful they are with their answers.
Granted I tend to use we researching believably of a plot, my friends don't think worse of my because they know me. You'll probably need your own reason they can accept so you don't get the creeper stare.
My Answer:
I like women who intelligent. I have yet to see a single game put out in the adult community that has ever managed to accurately represent someone that actually appears to be intelligent.
I would love for someone to write that game where the female character actually acts intelligent and it is believable.
Hi,
Back to topic - you also have to integrate the fact that nowadays we also have EQ (Emotional Quotient) because someone can be intelligent but have zero empathy (borderline sociopath) and those are hard to corrupt - they'll probably cut your throat before you can do anything with them.
"Corruption": it's most of the time a mean to "take revenge" over your "troubled childhood trauma" - so you corrupt people that are a close semblance to your past tormentor.
So on this one, to each his own.
A person with an IQ over 120 will also have difficulties understanding how people around 80/90 can actually breathe...
So, as a subjective personal conclusion, I would say that the "intelligence" of a potential corruption target is not really relevant: it is the MC's perception of what he will achieve thru the corruption of his target that matters:
(in layman's terms (for a dude) what will get my cock to be the hardest?)
-seeing my cleaning lady sucking my dick (for an extra 10$) because it's 07.45am and I'm too excited to go to work in my current state?
-having my secretary wearing latex underwear and a buttplug while looking like a British teacher from the 1940s? (because I know she made Teen porn webchat to pay for her degree - I have it on a hard drive)
-knowing that the female CEO I'm having business deals with will soon feel my cock in her ass in the Men's room while screaming for more? (because I have proof she embezzled some people early in her career and I can destroy her - or her ass...)
pick yours.
(and have fun)
Edit: (Yes you can pick the 3 options at the same time - you naughty Perv)
(ha ha ha ha - good one)
Back to topic - you also have to integrate the fact that nowadays we also have EQ (Emotional Quotient) because someone can be intelligent but have zero empathy (borderline sociopath) and those are hard to corrupt - they'll probably cut your throat before you can do anything with them.
"Corruption": it's most of the time a mean to "take revenge" over your "troubled childhood trauma" - so you corrupt people that are a close semblance to your past tormentor.
So on this one, to each his own.
+1 on this.
+1 also with the added:
A person with an IQ over 120 will also have difficulties understanding how people around 80/90 can actually breathe...
So, as a subjective personal conclusion, I would say that the "intelligence" of a potential corruption target is not really relevant: it is the MC's perception of what he will achieve thru the corruption of his target that matters:
(in layman's terms (for a dude) what will get my cock to be the hardest?)
-seeing my cleaning lady sucking my dick (for an extra 10$) because it's 07.45am and I'm too excited to go to work in my current state?
-having my secretary wearing latex underwear and a buttplug while looking like a British teacher from the 1940s? (because I know she made Teen porn webchat to pay for her degree - I have it on a hard drive)
-knowing that the female CEO I'm having business deals with will soon feel my cock in her ass in the Men's room while screaming for more? (because I have proof she embezzled some people early in her career and I can destroy her - or her ass...)
pick yours.
(and have fun)
Edit: (Yes you can pick the 3 options at the same time - you naughty Perv)
I would like to see more RPGS implement a party capture system where if you lose at a boss the boss takes your girl and corrupts her until you eventually get her back later in the dungeon but she also fights along side the boss. (Dungeon and Bride by Makura Soft is working on a similar system but that game isn't out yet just the demo). I really want Dungeon and Bride, I can't wait for the full game to be released. I'll settle for an alpha. The Demo had the mechanics I was looking for.
I like the smart intelligent girls being corrupted, it makes for a greater story when they start hunting their former friends to assimilate them. Plus corruption is my favorite thing in fiction (not IRL though), so I could go with the dumb ones too... but just look at this... I'm not sure who drew this but yeah this is right up my ally. I can take or leave NTR, but some NTR corruption is pretty well written.
Sexy corrupted heroines *drool*
I like the smart intelligent girls being corrupted, it makes for a greater story when they start hunting their former friends to assimilate them. Plus corruption is my favorite thing in fiction (not IRL though), so I could go with the dumb ones too... but just look at this... I'm not sure who drew this but yeah this is right up my ally. I can take or leave NTR, but some NTR corruption is pretty well written.
Sexy corrupted heroines *drool*
Last edited:
You don't need to be a genius to write about intelligent characters. IQ is also just one facet of intelligence. Intelligent or high IQ people can still make retarded decisions that screw everything. They can have character flaws like laziness, social, or emotional issues that hamper their success in whatever endeavor.
Still, what you are saying does have some truth to it. An absolutely basic writer that fails to contemplate or even recognize complex issues would have a hard time coming up with scenarios that actually display a character's intelligence. What's needed is not some "I have a high IQ, I am smart" writer, but basically just someone that doesn't suffer from Dunning-Kruger effect. At that point, a little bit of research can help with writing any type of character. Do you think the writers of Good Will Hunting or A Beautiful Mind, were anywhere near as intelligent as the characters they were writing about?
- Nov 3, 2017
- 9,194
- 7,699
In general in corruption, the more intelligent, strong-willed and capable the character is, the more satisfying it is to see them fall, as long as the writer can "sell" it, and I have no doubt such characters are harder to write, especially in this type of story where they undergo significant changes with a lot of internal conflict. I also prefer it if they start sexually reserved but not ignorant. Actually, it would be so refreshing to have a female MC that's a huge perv, but also geeky, unappealing, frumpy, awkward, overweight, the whole shut-in stereotype.
In trainer games, the "trainee" should be smart and mature enough to understand how they're being exploited, ideally a bit older too. Taking advantage of some naive barely-legal teen feels bad, man. Besides, it's better if they can see their own downfall and yet are powerless to stop it, especially when they start enjoying the treatment. I like this little genre-savvy exchange from Bitch Breaker:
Max: I just want to know more about you.
Claire: Why?
Max: What do you mean "why?" I'm just interested in you as a person.
Claire: You're interested in the "bitch" you're blackmailing?
Max: Well, yeah.
Claire: You're such a weird person. But, why?
Max: What do you mean?
Claire: Blackmail is in and of itself dehumanizing. it robs a woman of her agency and makes her something you control. It makes a woman less than human. Trying to humanize her after that is fucked-up. It's almost like enjoying her fall, as if seeing glimpses of her humanity makes her degradation all the sweeter.
Max: ...wow, yeah. I suppose it is.
Claire:...
Max:...
Claire: Okay, fine! My favorite food is braised asparagus.
In trainer games, the "trainee" should be smart and mature enough to understand how they're being exploited, ideally a bit older too. Taking advantage of some naive barely-legal teen feels bad, man. Besides, it's better if they can see their own downfall and yet are powerless to stop it, especially when they start enjoying the treatment. I like this little genre-savvy exchange from Bitch Breaker:
Max: I just want to know more about you.
Claire: Why?
Max: What do you mean "why?" I'm just interested in you as a person.
Claire: You're interested in the "bitch" you're blackmailing?
Max: Well, yeah.
Claire: You're such a weird person. But, why?
Max: What do you mean?
Claire: Blackmail is in and of itself dehumanizing. it robs a woman of her agency and makes her something you control. It makes a woman less than human. Trying to humanize her after that is fucked-up. It's almost like enjoying her fall, as if seeing glimpses of her humanity makes her degradation all the sweeter.
Max: ...wow, yeah. I suppose it is.
Claire:...
Max:...
Claire: Okay, fine! My favorite food is braised asparagus.
- Jan 26, 2021
- 6,889
- 21,478
