VN - Ren'Py - How to Train Your Dog [Ep3 v1.0] [SHADOWMASTER]

  1. 2.00 star(s)

    Cesco

    If you can give the option to skip over the chatgpt cutscenes, that'd be greeeeeat.
    It just kills the pacing when I already read what is shown and can't click past it. And in every the midst of all the clicking (you know the normal reaction when trying to skip a cutscene) the story actually jumped way ahead.

    Other than that, you just gotta proofread your work. Like Darla with a capital D on the dialogue box and using italic for inner thoughts instead of saying "Darla's inner voice". And you're over-describing scenes. No need to describe "Darla placing her hand on his shoulder trying to convey warmth" when we can see it right on screen. It's redundant, and just more work on your end, ya know.
    Story wise- you can suspend your disbelief in regards to modifying the dogs with yada yada science, but "realistically" if reports/complaints were coming in about all the dogs being this super aggressive, this company (and the dogs) would be put down.
  2. 2.00 star(s)

    EyeWish1

    Ep3 v 1.0 reviewed.

    A laugh out loud bestiality story set in a world where a virus makes males infertile. But have no fear, science has cum to the rescue and developed a way to impregnate woman with genetically enhanced dogs.

    ------------

    Pros:

    1- Hot looking MILFs

    2- Some of the renders are decent.

    3- Nice set designs.

    4- If you are into bestiality you might like this.

    Cons:

    1- The AI voices are flat out awful. I just hope it's intentional, otherwise I would really question the developers thought process here.

    2- AI scenes are integrated into some scenes and it doesn't work for me.

    3- Awful dialogue. Way too wordy and redundant. It could be cut down a lot and still get the message across.

    4- Both sons look underage. But I guess they are "18" for storytelling purposes.

    5- Animations are very crude.

    6- Scene transitions are confusing, switching back and forth to different events in time. This only hurts the story.


    Final verdict - Erectile dysfunction.

    Was this meant to be funny or just a lot of bad design choices? Either way, you can't not laugh at the absurdity of the robotic voice acting and silly story.

    My suggestion would be to scrap the voices and the AI scenes, get a proof reader and trim the excessive dialogue. You can tell this story much better in less time.

    The dev has skill with renders but needs help with story writing and development. I wish him/her good luck going forward.