I don't really know what to think about it but checking out SubscribeStar adult site I came across some controversial sexual content:
-3D lolis. (not 100% life-like but close enough)
-2D lolis (hardcore sexual content, namely drawings)
Some content is being offered as part of games/visual novels not just posters or illustrations.
The thing is that SubscribeStar is an USA based company and that content is kind of dangerous or borderline illegal in the USA.
I remember some years ago there was some amendments made to the laws regulating computer generated or drawn sexual content depicting prepubescent characters;
It was made unconstitutional because violates first amendment rights, don't remember the details but it means that loli and shota content is not outright illegal, there are some conditions to be consider as such.
I know most sites regulate that kind of content, like here with the rule 7, and also I have noticed that many creator's sites are censoring loli and shota like Pixiv, Patreon, and many more.
At SubscribeStar they're using a different payment process, they're making credit cards transactions, they stopped using PayPal a while ago.
Like you know credit card transactions link your personal information to the transactions you make; full name, address, billing address, and more.
So I don't know if they're braking the mold by allowing a bit more controversial stuff to gain more exposure or subscribers, or if its some competition strategy to make the site look bad and make it get into legal troubles, or if its some honeypot/trap made to lure and identify people paying for simulated underage sex...
What do you think it is?
-3D lolis. (not 100% life-like but close enough)
-2D lolis (hardcore sexual content, namely drawings)
Some content is being offered as part of games/visual novels not just posters or illustrations.
The thing is that SubscribeStar is an USA based company and that content is kind of dangerous or borderline illegal in the USA.
I remember some years ago there was some amendments made to the laws regulating computer generated or drawn sexual content depicting prepubescent characters;
It was made unconstitutional because violates first amendment rights, don't remember the details but it means that loli and shota content is not outright illegal, there are some conditions to be consider as such.
I know most sites regulate that kind of content, like here with the rule 7, and also I have noticed that many creator's sites are censoring loli and shota like Pixiv, Patreon, and many more.
At SubscribeStar they're using a different payment process, they're making credit cards transactions, they stopped using PayPal a while ago.
Like you know credit card transactions link your personal information to the transactions you make; full name, address, billing address, and more.
So I don't know if they're braking the mold by allowing a bit more controversial stuff to gain more exposure or subscribers, or if its some competition strategy to make the site look bad and make it get into legal troubles, or if its some honeypot/trap made to lure and identify people paying for simulated underage sex...
What do you think it is?