One? One? ONE? Me and the others adressed thousands of points why he is scamming and you countered ZERO of them. You don't give a reasonable explanation why is he NOT scamming other than countering said criticism with the "Thats not true" sentence or changing the topic. I ask you one last time. Give me one reasonable point what proves that Eromancer is not a scammer.
you didn't address this one
Every character in game currently was a promised character at some point, but now they're in game.
nor this one.
The most recent bunny girl animation is not featured with any other characters, its new, how is that a reskin?
In what way am i changing topic? have you forgotten what i was replying to? You're like an old man that has no idea where he is. The previous person said "
constantly promises new characters that never get animated" Were the bunny girls new characters that were promised at one point? yes. Are they in game now? yes. Recently Mr. Black was added, is he not new to the game? yes, are you still following or did i lose you? ok, and what does never mean? :
at no time in the past or future. Does that still ring true? No, can you claim "never" as fact then? No. So then its an opinion as i said.
Next one "
new animations are just reskinned old ones" (which is dumb since most lewd games recycle the same animations just in different styles) anyways, is the pole scene done with the bunny girls "new"? Yes. Is it done with other any other characters? No. Then can you claim "reskinned" in this case as fact? No, it would be opinion.
Now on to you, what is a scam? a fraud, which is:
wrongful or criminal deception intended to result in financial or personal gain. Where is the evidence that proves he is factually intending to do this? Someone can be a novice or slow on their project, it does not mean their "
intention" was to "
deceive" for financial or personal gain. That's only
your interpretation of it,
you believe he is
intentional trying to scam. Are you honestly stating there is 0% chance that what you interpret as "scamming" is simply him just not knowing how to make a game? a lack of experience as game dev or other variables and not a some "huge scheme to take money"? For something to be "fact" it must be true same way 2 + 2 will always = 4 no matter what you believe, that is an example of a "fact". Your statement has many loose ends to be "fact".
Now lastly, from all that i said what's something that was "not reasonable or changing topic"?
I literally define words for you, i'm getting to that point where i need to define even the smallest simplest of words. At that point it's obvious you're just closing your eyes to everything or extremely ignorant. Which is ironic coming from the person claiming others are "blind" to the facts lol