Question: Posting stuff with Shota content

[Vanaduke]

I have two fan-art scenarios to which I need clarification whether these are allowed within the forum.

Scenario 1. A nude older woman together with an underage, pubescent boy but without sexual (albeit close-contact) interaction. I.g. Nude beach, casual conversation or a woman giving a youngling a bath.

Scenario 2. A Magic spell turned a young adult back to his pubescent physique but retains his mental maturity to which proceeds to copulate with the aforementioned woman.

 

[redknight00]

Any depiction of characters who look underage in sexual context is banned here, so I'd say yes for both.

 

[Papa Ernie]

I have two fan-art scenarios to which I need clarification whether these are allowed within the forum.

Scenario 1. A nude older woman together with an underage, pubescent boy but without sexual (albeit close-contact) interaction. I.g. Nude beach, casual conversation or a woman giving a youngling a bath.

Scenario 2. A Magic spell turned a young adult back to his pubescent physique but retains his mental maturity to which proceeds to copulate with the aforementioned woman.

@Bloo @TCMS @Sam

 

[Oiz]

Any depiction of characters who look underage in sexual context is banned here, so I'd say yes for both.

That's not true at all, see the answer below the other quote.

I have two fan-art scenarios to which I need clarification whether these are allowed within the forum.

Scenario 1. A nude older woman together with an underage, pubescent boy but without sexual (albeit close-contact) interaction. I.g. Nude beach, casual conversation or a woman giving a youngling a bath.

Scenario 2. A Magic spell turned a young adult back to his pubescent physique but retains his mental maturity to which proceeds to copulate with the aforementioned woman.

If a game contains sexual contact with realistic or semi-realistic character(s) who show no sign of puberty(ie prepubescent) then the game should not be shared. Basically, if it looks like a real kid don't post it. As this involves some discretion, if you are unsure ask a Staff Member

This is what the rules state. Since you explicitly state the boy(s) as being pubescent, it might be fine. I would ask a staff member via private message with an example, though if I were you. Just in case.

 

[Vanaduke]

That's not true at all, see the answer below the other quote.



This is what the rules state. Since you explicitly state the boy(s) as being pubescent, it might be fine. I would ask a staff member via private message with an example, though if I were you. Just in case.

I do hope they will allow me. ICSTOR does it and gets away with it. But my idea however is much younger...per-pubescent I suppose...

 

[Vanaduke]

No reply from the mods. Quick render but picture the woman bare-breasted or perhaps both are hugging each other (only the boy is clothed), mother-and-son relationship, no sexual attraction whatsoever.

I was aiming for a simple hug from the two, no clothes for the woman of course, bare-bosom. Content and context is sexual-free, just a mother-son bonding.

 

[redknight00]

This is what the rules state. Since you explicitly state the boy(s) as being pubescent, it might be fine. I would ask a staff member via private message with an example, though if I were you. Just in case.

Oh right, I miss read that, though it was a kid.

No reply from the mods. Quick render but picture the woman bare-breasted or perhaps both are hugging each other (only the boy is clothed), mother-and-son relationship, no sexual attraction whatsoever.

I was aiming for a simple hug from the two, no clothes for the woman of course, bare-bosom. Content and context is sexual-free, just a mother-son bonding.

I mean no offense, but do you really need to be in the grey area? If you post a naked woman in a porn forum then it's going to someone's fap folder of course, if it's all about bonding it can be done with clothes and you'd be much safer (unless you really need them undressed).

 

[Vanaduke]

Oh right, I miss read that, though it was a kid.



I mean no offense, but do you really need to be in the grey area? If you post a naked woman in a porn forum then it's going to someone's fap folder of course, if it's all about bonding it can be done with clothes and you'd be much safer (unless you really need them undressed).

It has to be in the gray area. I don't want to be in the receiving end of the ban hammer. Was really hoping for an approval for scenario 2. Looking at you ICSTOR games.

 

[King Monkey Mon]

No reply from the mods. Quick render but picture the woman bare-breasted or perhaps both are hugging each other (only the boy is clothed), mother-and-son relationship, no sexual attraction whatsoever.

I was aiming for a simple hug from the two, no clothes for the woman of course, bare-bosom. Content and context is sexual-free, just a mother-son bonding.

i heard from the mods if the kid is 14 its ok since thats the age limit lolis have to be in order to be put on here however i love straight shota stuff so if it was up to me which it isnt i would love to have straight shota stuff on here

 

[Vanaduke]

Mods....where are you guys?