I'm okay with AI art, and people are complaining about a grind, but snapping shots of girls is the gameplay, so i dunno what to tell you
My grip is they seem to be using like 1st version AI software, which means the girls look too sharp and god the orifices look like gapping holes sometimes. Not. Attractive.
Also there's only like 250 pics and you need to take about 1000 or so to get the cash to buy everything. So i guess the "grind" does get old. Also the 3d stuff is just very not polished. So it feels like a cheap cash grab tbh. They need more pics, and to redo everything with better (freely available) software, i mean one girl had two and a half ass-cheeks ffs, how did that pass quality control? Was it took much work to regenerate one picture?
My grip is they seem to be using like 1st version AI software, which means the girls look too sharp and god the orifices look like gapping holes sometimes. Not. Attractive.
Also there's only like 250 pics and you need to take about 1000 or so to get the cash to buy everything. So i guess the "grind" does get old. Also the 3d stuff is just very not polished. So it feels like a cheap cash grab tbh. They need more pics, and to redo everything with better (freely available) software, i mean one girl had two and a half ass-cheeks ffs, how did that pass quality control? Was it took much work to regenerate one picture?