Someone's gotta make a blasphemy porn game like the monastery but with Islam

remillon

Member
May 16, 2020
236
188
167
There's tons of hijab porn and Islam blasphemy porn on the internet. It's possible to make a html game with those. Hell I wouldn't even mind some AI in the mix if someone can pull this off.
 

Doorknob22

Super Moderator
Moderator
Game Developer
Nov 3, 2017
2,768
6,611
718
I imagine the corruption progression starts with showing some ankle.

Such a game could be hot, but in order to actually pull it of, it would need to be realistic, i.e. the one heck of a slooooooow buuuuurn. In fact, even Insomnimaniac Games's probably humorous comment makes sense in this context: seeing the naked shin of a woman who is always covered is erotic IMHO.

Alas, think in all Hijabi content I have seen, the women strip faster than a mom asking her son to help her with yoga in a typical AVN.
 
  • Thinking Face
Reactions: Insomnimaniac Games

Handyfff

Newbie
Jul 19, 2021
82
103
156
I imagine the corruption progression starts with showing some ankle.
Actually the proper way would be something like this. Set in a country or era where characters around her would be strictly religious. Then it would be taboo. The effort to turn her (and people around her) into lusty sinners would be worth it. But almost all the games that have hijabis in them, either remove the hijab or make her a slut in one conversation.
 

Handyfff

Newbie
Jul 19, 2021
82
103
156
There's tons of hijab porn and Islam blasphemy porn on the internet. It's possible to make a html game with those. Hell I wouldn't even mind some AI in the mix if someone can pull this off.
I don't think anyone is gonna go for blasphemy on this one because you know. But the slow corruption aspect should be explored in more games.
 

anne O'nymous

I'm not grumpy, I'm just coded that way.
Modder
Donor
Respected User
Jun 10, 2017
12,826
21,169
1,026
Monastery, slow corruption, Islam... The number of people, in this thread, who never listened in history lessons is astounding.

Slutty or sexually deviant (aka bi/lesbians) daughters were sent to convent. Wives who dishonored there husband were sent to convent. At the time where people were the most strict on a religious point of view, you had equal chances to find someone to empty your balls in a convent than in a brothel.

As for Islam, historically the hijab have nothing to do with purity. In fact it's not even mandatory according to the Qur'an; same for Abaya, Niqab and Burqa. The two last come from regions where nomadism was the norm, and where a way to protect women against abduction; when you don't know if you kidnap the beautiful 16yo daughter or the 75yo grand mother, you think twice. Due to the climate in those region, it also wasn't this rare that the Niqab or Burqa were the sole clothes they wore; implied no underclothes nor even underwear.
This while women were so trusted that they were moving banks, wearing the wealth of their husband on their body through their jewelry. And behind closed doors, those jewelry could easily turn as the sole clothes they would wear.
And, of course, do I have to remind that Harem is an Islam thing and were full of Muslim women?

Of course, all this wasn't generalized, yet it's what those time were. Nuns purity, Muslim women modesty, all this is modern constructions.
 

anne O'nymous

I'm not grumpy, I'm just coded that way.
Modder
Donor
Respected User
Jun 10, 2017
12,826
21,169
1,026


Are you sure? Footnotes...
And you, are you sure?

The verse talk about "adornments", it's the footnote, and therefore one's reading, that define it as including hairs.
The other Surah addressing this is Al Ahzab, verse 59 [ ]. Note the wording, that is clearly not a command, and once again is vague enough to include, or not, hairs. Then see how the footnote present it as being an order...

Then, if you have time, you can search in the Hebraic and Christian tradition. You'll find the same kind of recommendations; women, stay humble, do not put your beauty in display when you are in public.
 
  • Thinking Face
Reactions: Icarus Media

Middling Emu

Newbie
Nov 1, 2016
78
894
216
And you, are you sure?

The verse talk about "adornments", it's the footnote, and therefore one's reading, that define it as including hairs.
The other Surah addressing this is Al Ahzab, verse 59 [ ]. Note the wording, that is clearly not a command, and once again is vague enough to include, or not, hairs. Then see how the footnote present it as being an order...

Then, if you have time, you can search in the Hebraic and Christian tradition. You'll find the same kind of recommendations; women, stay humble, do not put your beauty in display when you are in public.
What crap. All fiqh agree that a woman should cover her hair in public, and almost all agree that a woman should only show her face and hands, i.e. that which it is difficult not to show.

Orthodox Jewish women sometimes cover their hair, but hardly anyone seems to rape them if they don't.

My grandmothers were Christians, and wore headscarves. But that was before the invention of hairspray, and the only wore the headscarf until they got to wherever they were going, then took it off to wantonly display their hair to any males present. Neither were ever raped, or at least if they were, they never complained about it!
 

anne O'nymous

I'm not grumpy, I'm just coded that way.
Modder
Donor
Respected User
Jun 10, 2017
12,826
21,169
1,026
[...] but hardly anyone seems to rape them if they don't.
[...] Neither were ever raped, or at least if they were, they never complained about it!
Can I know why the fuck you talk about rape about something that isn't even about sexuality?
 

Count Morado

Fragrant Asshole
Donor
Respected User
Jan 21, 2022
11,820
23,111
913
Literally the topic of OP Hall Monitor, if they don't want it discussed, report the thread to be nuked. 'Nuff said.
Thread is fine because the tenets of religion isn't the focus. You three delving into religious tenets is off-topic and may violate rules. Yes, I could report the posts... But you could be an adult and take the nudge instead of someon having to "tattle" on you.
 

obibobi

Well-Known Member
May 10, 2017
1,111
3,042
488
Monastery, slow corruption, Islam... The number of people, in this thread, who never listened in history lessons is astounding.

Slutty or sexually deviant (aka bi/lesbians) daughters were sent to convent. Wives who dishonored there husband were sent to convent. At the time where people were the most strict on a religious point of view, you had equal chances to find someone to empty your balls in a convent than in a brothel.

As for Islam, historically the hijab have nothing to do with
We get it, your defensive, for whatever reason, accurate or redditor knowledge, nothing you said is relevant to the point of this thread. You wouldn't care about realism if this thread was about nuns.

It doesn't change that the Hijab is an underutilized symbol of the hidden female sexual form, its got so much untapped potential for potential taboo stories.
 
  • Jizzed my pants
Reactions: anne O'nymous