remillon
Member
- May 16, 2020
- 236
- 188
- 167
There's tons of hijab porn and Islam blasphemy porn on the internet. It's possible to make a html game with those. Hell I wouldn't even mind some AI in the mix if someone can pull this off.
I imagine the corruption progression starts with showing some ankle.
Actually the proper way would be something like this. Set in a country or era where characters around her would be strictly religious. Then it would be taboo. The effort to turn her (and people around her) into lusty sinners would be worth it. But almost all the games that have hijabis in them, either remove the hijab or make her a slut in one conversation.I imagine the corruption progression starts with showing some ankle.
I don't think anyone is gonna go for blasphemy on this one because you know. But the slow corruption aspect should be explored in more games.There's tons of hijab porn and Islam blasphemy porn on the internet. It's possible to make a html game with those. Hell I wouldn't even mind some AI in the mix if someone can pull this off.
One of them even made a thread about it, didn't you Arabi1If you wanna piss off brown people tell them you wipe your ass with toilet paper. They seem to be very emotional about this
As for Islam, historically the hijab have nothing to do with purity. In fact it's not even mandatory according to the Qur'an;
And you, are you sure?You must be registered to see the links
Are you sure? Footnotes...
What crap. All fiqh agree that a woman should cover her hair in public, and almost all agree that a woman should only show her face and hands, i.e. that which it is difficult not to show.And you, are you sure?
The verse talk about "adornments", it's the footnote, and therefore one's reading, that define it as including hairs.
The other Surah addressing this is Al Ahzab, verse 59 [You must be registered to see the links]. Note the wording, that is clearly not a command, and once again is vague enough to include, or not, hairs. Then see how the footnote present it as being an order...
Then, if you have time, you can search in the Hebraic and Christian tradition. You'll find the same kind of recommendations; women, stay humble, do not put your beauty in display when you are in public.
Can I know why the fuck you talk about rape about something that isn't even about sexuality?[...] but hardly anyone seems to rape them if they don't.
[...] Neither were ever raped, or at least if they were, they never complained about it!
Literally the topic of OP Hall Monitor, if they don't want it discussed, report the thread to be nuked. 'Nuff said.
Because the hadith refer to avoiding harassment, and I expect you know what is meant by that?Can I know why the fuck you talk about rape about something that isn't even about sexuality?
Thread is fine because the tenets of religion isn't the focus. You three delving into religious tenets is off-topic and may violate rules. Yes, I could report the posts... But you could be an adult and take the nudge instead of someon having to "tattle" on you.Literally the topic of OP Hall Monitor, if they don't want it discussed, report the thread to be nuked. 'Nuff said.
We get it, your defensive, for whatever reason, accurate or redditor knowledge, nothing you said is relevant to the point of this thread. You wouldn't care about realism if this thread was about nuns.Monastery, slow corruption, Islam... The number of people, in this thread, who never listened in history lessons is astounding.
Slutty or sexually deviant (aka bi/lesbians) daughters were sent to convent. Wives who dishonored there husband were sent to convent. At the time where people were the most strict on a religious point of view, you had equal chances to find someone to empty your balls in a convent than in a brothel.
As for Islam, historically the hijab have nothing to do with