- Nov 3, 2018
- 41
- 48
just abandon this game at this point what a waste of time
Never in my life have I seen someone who likes to suck a dev's dick more than you. And you're paying him for it too.I think the last thing we should do now is hate the game. It has received a tech update and DarkCookie will now gradually bring back the old content in a new edition. Anyone who has played the old content will see that a lot has changed in terms of the story. For example, when you meet Erik for the first time, Mrs. Johnson comes out of the house and hands him the lunchbox. These scenes are drawn with great attention to detail. Or when you meet Mia for the first time in front of the school, how the picture then takes on a new perspective and you see Mia looking at the bus, then she turns around and looks at the main character. These scenes turned out great and correspond to the quality of a DarkCookie.
To be honest, I thought that DC would copy every scene 1:1, the fact that they are inserting whole new scenes into the story is just a great thing. And yes... DarkCookie took a long time and the update is still not completely finished. You can go into all the buildings, you can buy everything. It's basically been remade at the beginning, just with more content in the initial story.
Unfortunately, the Ronda update will come much later, if he now delivers the old content in a new version every 2 months. But then he'll at least have a basic framework and will then concentrate on the new storylines. And if he dares to do another poll about whether he should do a 4k tech update, then stop voting for it. We don't have DarkCookie to thank for the tech update, but his Patreons who voted for it and it got the most votes. So DC was just trying to implement what they "wanted". A game that was so far advanced... well... let's put it this way... it should have been clear to every Patreon that such a tech update would take time. With the new scenes, he has redeemed himself for me.
I've supported him again on Patreon. But... if he doesn't deliver in two months and it takes longer again, then I'll stop it immediately.
People are mad,why do you care?Wtf is it with the sudden review bombing?
There isn't a review bombing.Wtf is it with the sudden review bombing?
Dev has been milking his patrons for years now, released an update with about 98% of the content removed in exchange for about 1 new scene and a couple old scenes slightly cleaned up.Wtf is it with the sudden review bombing?
no, well it might be, but another user here looked into it, all the old art is still there but not usable so that is the reason why it has it's size.funny thing, this 'release' has 1.2 GB, almost EXACTLY as the previous one. With only 10% content. Oh man, their code must be a mess.
You don't optimize for size early on, that comes later when everything is done, size is basically only relevant for mobile these days. If anything STS is lightweight because it reuses a ton of stuff.funny thing, this 'release' has 1.2 GB, almost EXACTLY as the previous one. With only 10% content. Oh man, their code must be a mess.
No they don't, the reviews that follows the rules get to stay, there are plenty that are still there.
This has been discussed at length now.
While the 5 star reviews are weirdly positive they appear to live up to what a review here demands.
If people writing 1-2 star reviews took a little more time describing why the game is bad instead of just sayin dev bad, they would stay.
Is so weird because in the Luna in tavern thread they allow people talking shit about the devs scummy behaviour.Idk about others, but my review said the game has been in development for 8 years, and now had barely any content, so I was recommending not to play it. Mod tanked it, without citing any rule I had broken.
I do think that talking about the dev's poor behavior should have it's place in a review tho, but that's just me.
I mean, if DC was doing something provably malicious, they might allow it, but as it stands its all just hearsay and conjecture.Idk about others, but my review said the game has been in development for 8 years, and now had barely any content, so I was recommending not to play it. Mod tanked it, without citing any rule I had broken.
I do think that talking about the dev's poor behavior should have it's place in a review tho, but that's just me.
My guess would be different mods reading the rules differently.Is so weird because in the Luna in tavern thread they allow people talking shit about the devs scummy behaviour.
Why is not allowed here?
It should, in part.Idk about others, but my review said the game has been in development for 8 years, and now had barely any content, so I was recommending not to play it. Mod tanked it, without citing any rule I had broken.
I do think that talking about the dev's poor behavior should have it's place in a review tho, but that's just me.
this is like the 10th 'tech update'so instead of update, we have a start over...