I'm curious what other people think about tattoos. I don't have any personally but as long as they're good quality and can be easily covered by clothing they don't bother me. Things that can't be covered like face, hand, foot, neck tats are a different story. I find those tacky and have never seen an example of a tat covering any of those areas that I found appealing on either men or women. I also don't like fun zone tats. If we get to the point where I get all your clothes off, I want to admire the goods, I don't want them covered up.
The only differences I can really think of between off limits zones for men vs women is that personally I don't like chest tats on women or tramp stamps on guys. Otherwise I think the same rules apply to both roughly. What do you guys think? Full body blackout? Face tats? Smaller coverable tats? No tats at all? No quality standards? Tats that look like they were made by a 3 year old with a crayon?
The only differences I can really think of between off limits zones for men vs women is that personally I don't like chest tats on women or tramp stamps on guys. Otherwise I think the same rules apply to both roughly. What do you guys think? Full body blackout? Face tats? Smaller coverable tats? No tats at all? No quality standards? Tats that look like they were made by a 3 year old with a crayon?