Brief review of version 0.0.1
- I will not mince words. I understand and appreciate the work that was done, but it needs more attention to detail.
- Some examples: Floating wine(?) glass in the room; Piano scale and legs, the whole piano thing really; the grip on the swords, both the angles and the hand positions; the disappearing hammer; mentions of a cape that doesn't exist; Crimson banners that are white............. these are just the obvious ones.
- Graphics are maybe not the strongest part of this (the maybe is just to soften the blow). The hairs are atrocious. The images are way too grainy. I could go on, but, nah...
- The story. Well, it's nice and all, but we haven't really progressed.
- The writing style isn't bad, but, since it goes into details the graphics don't show, it becomes an antagonist instead of a participant.
All in all, I'd grade this 1 in 5. The one single point is for the Lesbian scene, even as poorly done as it was. That "thing" they squirted... come on...
- I will not mince words. I understand and appreciate the work that was done, but it needs more attention to detail.
- Some examples: Floating wine(?) glass in the room; Piano scale and legs, the whole piano thing really; the grip on the swords, both the angles and the hand positions; the disappearing hammer; mentions of a cape that doesn't exist; Crimson banners that are white............. these are just the obvious ones.
- Graphics are maybe not the strongest part of this (the maybe is just to soften the blow). The hairs are atrocious. The images are way too grainy. I could go on, but, nah...
- The story. Well, it's nice and all, but we haven't really progressed.
- The writing style isn't bad, but, since it goes into details the graphics don't show, it becomes an antagonist instead of a participant.
All in all, I'd grade this 1 in 5. The one single point is for the Lesbian scene, even as poorly done as it was. That "thing" they squirted... come on...
