I understand what you mean, but I disagree.
Isn't it a pressure to want the current structure of the game not to change?
You say that the game was planned in this structure in the form of 4 main LI, we cannot know this.
Even if what you said about the developer's only 4 main LI plans when creating the game is true, I don't want to get into a philosophical discussion, but over the years ideas and plans change.
And this game has been developing since 2018 as far as I can see it's a very long time.
My opinion has not changed about adding at least one main LI from a different family.
If the developer activates the game's VN Mode, we will not be affected by free roaming as a player.
I hope you don't misunderstand me.
I never said the current structure of 4 main LIs is planned by Hopes is a fact.
I only said that there's factors which strongly seem to imply this (such as the portraits and relationship points such as red hearts).
And yes, as you said ideas and plans can change (and Hopes did change some aspects of the game).
But from what I've seen Hopes' responses to my questions till now.
It seemed like he was trimming the unnecessary fat (for the lack of better term for less useful parts of the game) off, and focusing on what is working.
Dev activating game's VN mode? Uhhhh.... why?
The lion's share of players who play the game do it through "Full Experience" mode (there's also "Just Story" mode, and "VN mode" Iirc, other that Full Exp, only Just Story is available), which gives players control with the limited free-roaming inside the DeLuca mansion.
I get that you like Siobhan very much (and you want either her or another character from another Family to be a main LI), but the game has always had Main LIs be available in free-roam.
To throw that away and force players (i.e. Full Experience players especially. But iirc [though not 100% sure, since I'm a Full Exp player primarily], even just Story has Freeroam in it? Only ones exempt from freeroam would be VN mode players, the mode which hasn't even been implemented yet) to go through VN mode just for a new LI's sake would really stick out like a sore thumb (not to mention the whole inconsistency between the 4 main LIs till now and the "new" main LI).
I know you'll disagree (and that's fine, not like I'm trying to persuade you or anything), but for me? I'd rather they just keep Siobhan as a side LI but with more presence, than push her (or other new female character) in as a main LI, when it clearly doesn't seem to fit naturally with how the game seemed to have been designed as.
And also, let's say I humor the scenario (of activating VN mode for the "new" LI) despite me thinking it's a bad idea.
There's still the issues of there needing to be a heap of dedicated lewd/freeroam events just for that new character alone, not to mention the rotation issue (basically points 2 & 3 that I mentioned).
Now don't misunderstand, I like Siobhan too (actually I like her a lot), and same goes for other characters of this game (especially female characters, haha).
But I just don't think it is worth it to turn her (or any additional "new" female character) into a main LI, given all the hassles as well as hoops and hurdles Hopes would need to jump over.
And current LI system Hopes has, works with no issues (so there's no need for an overhaul, like with Wilfred's Contracts).
As the old saying goes "If it ain't broke, don't fix it."
Mc father/Cordia = They were not married.
Would this be incest?
That doesn't matter (that they were not married).
It's implied in some scenes (though I'm not so sure whether it's true or not) that MC's father = Antonio's father.
That would make Cordia MC's stepmom (given she's Antonio's biological mother).
And if that actually turns out to be true in the future, then according to this site (and how tags are attached to games regarding the Zone's definitions), the game will likely end up getting tagged with incest (and yes, definition of incest varies depending on the person. Some would consider such relationship incest, whereas others would not. But the Zone's tags definition I remember such relationship being categorized as incest).
Not that I mind whether it's categorized that way or not, but I just don't think Hopes would risk it all by putting the story in such situation (and the debacle that would result with that).