- Apr 12, 2017
- 589
- 992
I did not complain about your original post at all. You implied with your response that you intentionally put your images in a spoiler and tag them so that people will know that it is AI art and can skip it or not. I was informing you that... while it may seem obvious to you that "realistic" means, "I'm posting AI art," that is not at all the only way to interpret "realistic version". It could have been actual porn grabbed from the internet (true realistic). It could have been daz. It could have been a number of other things as well (AI art being only one of many possibilities). Either way, I know I did not know it was going to be AI art before I opened the spoiler (and I continue to not be complaining that it was)Since it is quoted, it is about the more realistic version of the predecessor. The face in particular looks much more realistic than the previous one. If you make just a little effort, you can understand it. And as I said before: the "originals" have even less to do with the characters, so you should primarily criticise those that everyone can see immediately instead of my "hidden" ones. He basically complained about AI and the models before were also AI-made!
You can see from the likes that some people like it, so why not just ignore it if you don't want to deal with the core problem? Instead, you send negativity, which is what the internet does best! Have a nice Sunday! And don't worry: I'm not going to waste any more of my time on this nagativity.
I wasn't denouncing you for how you declared it either. It was informational. If you want to inform people that you are putting AI art in a spoiler, then mention AI. If you don't want to let people know it is AI ahead of time then don't. Take offense or don't.
As for the comment that after looking at the image, the pre-spoiler information makes sense... well yeah, that defeats the purpose of pre-spoiler information (regardless of whether people agree with you or not). And not everyone chases down original posts that get replied to to decide if they want to open a spoiler or not (I know I do not). For anyone who did follow the trail to the original before opening the spoiler though, well, that would have caused them to look at AI art the same as opening your spoiler.
Once again, not saying you did anything wrong. I'm simply pointing out that it is not obvious from your post that the spoiler contains AI art (whether some people make that guess or not).
