devilkkw
Member
- Mar 17, 2021
- 338
- 1,146
Boarborn
Member
- Apr 11, 2022
- 118
- 106
- Sep 26, 2018
- 3,137
- 3,215
PandaRepublic
Member
- May 18, 2018
- 215
- 2,167
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
PS. I want a nipple fixer!! Eyes too, but nipples!
devilkkw
Member
- Mar 17, 2021
- 338
- 1,146
this is a good prompt, maybe try to go up in cfg.
I see you work a 3.5, with many negative. And is it your merged model?
There is your prompt with not negative at cfg11:
And this one with a negative TI i'm working for photorealism:
Your prompt work good, maybe some negative work bad with it, just prune it, because with not negative you get good result.
I see you work a 3.5, with many negative. And is it your merged model?
There is your prompt with not negative at cfg11:
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
And this one with a negative TI i'm working for photorealism:
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
Your prompt work good, maybe some negative work bad with it, just prune it, because with not negative you get good result.
- Sep 26, 2018
- 3,137
- 3,215
devilkkw
Member
- Mar 17, 2021
- 338
- 1,146
daddyCzapo
Member
- Mar 26, 2019
- 245
- 1,507
2 redheads for you. If i work something out with next set i'll post some more later. I just now noticed that the face is sharp and in focus and the rest is blurry. Anybody have suggestions regarding hires upscaler? I need a good one for semi-realsitic stuff
- Sep 26, 2018
- 3,137
- 3,215
here is my negative prompts if anyone can tell me what would be better
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
sharlotte
Member
- Jan 10, 2019
- 323
- 1,749
He is not drooling enough, only thing wrong with this one! And his eyes are looking at the wrong point of interest 
- Sep 26, 2018
- 3,137
- 3,215
it's just that I don't know how to move the second person eyes or anything like that yetView attachment 2537237 He is not drooling enough, only thing wrong with this one! And his eyes are looking at the wrong point of interest
- Oct 10, 2017
- 7,671
- 22,176
I'd say you should delete the third. It's very.. 'Rule7'-y.
page not found messageIt is trained on AI generated images.. so it does not look like any real person.. prefer it that way.. i think the first one is cuter, but the second one is more versatile.. and only trained in less than 200 steps
I did a google image search on both so I am sure that they don't resemble any real person.
If you want to do the same, check out this tutorial from BelieveDiffusion
You must be registered to see the links