I mean fiction is fiction is already the law pretty much.. Such laws make 0 difference in this case. The stuff being removed is not being removed because it's somehow illegal. Perfectly legal stuff is being removed simply because the harassers don't like that particular genre/tag and find it "offensive" or "exploitive" (and the genres will keep expanding over time because they really don't like ALL porn, but know they have to go step by step), and they are able to convince the payment processors that it's too much of a hassle to deal with these lunatics so they'll just force steam/itch/etc to ban it.
What's actually needed is a law that say payment processors can not be at all be involved with the censoring/moderation of the content that people and business are buying or selling. A law that says banking and payment processing is a fundamental right necessary to live in modern society and you can't be denied it based on content unless you are committing an actual crime with said purchase/sale and they are willing to file a police report or whatever else to prove it. Unfortunately such laws are very unlikely to get passed at this time as we are losing more and more freedoms and rights through laws these days in many countries, not gaining them.
It's not really though, that's the problem. The fact of the matter is that it's
not law at the moment. The US has that whole
thing with the Miller test and whatnot, where basically obscenity is not really treated as fiction no matter what form it takes, because the law does not, at the moment, distinguish between purely fictional obscene content and pornography involving real people. Even outside of porn, there's examples like Germany where the law absolutely loses its shit if you put a Swastika in a game or comic or anything. It doesn't matter if it's there to
mock the Nazis or to make dumb games where someone travels from the future to murder Hitler or something... they do not accept it
at all.
If you keep digging, you will find all sorts of examples, all over the world, where fiction is
not in fact treated as fiction.
That's one of the reasons why this is happening right now. For VISA and MasterCard, there is
no difference between fictional pornographic content and actual porn. There is
no law that truly differentiates between these things on all levels. Regardless of how much they do or don't care, the fact of the matter is that they can use the current legal status to do whatever they want, and they can even present themselves as the good guys if they really try.
"We don't
want to go after you gooner games, but right now, if we get sued about this stuff, it'd be treated the same as real **, and we'd be fucked. So something gonna give, and it's you guys. Sorry." - They can
absolutely play this sort of card if they really need too. It'd be fake as all fuck for sure, but right now, legally speaking, they hold all the cards.
That's why I'm saying that the US and the EU seriously need to put into law the idea that fiction is fiction, that it's not reality, that it should not be treated as reality and that enjoying fictional content that is "morally objectionable" or whatever is not a crime or something that needs to be regulated beyond putting appropriate age restrictions. It should be put into law that essentially anything goes in fiction, as long as it's clearly fiction and no one is getting hurt. (Unlike pornography involving actual people, where actual people can and at times do get hurt for any number of reasons.) Adults should be able to spend their money on whatever fictional content they want, even said content involves murder-fucking people or vampire Nazis eating British babies (ah, Hellsing, the things you let me write even today...)...
As things currently stand, we can't actually point at groups like Karens United or whatever and say "Shut up bitches, it's just pixels, the law says you can do whatever you want with those. They don't have or
need rights, much less activist groups."