Conservatives have been against porn since the 70s and have accomplished jack shit. For the past 10 years liberals have been against non-lgbtq+ sexually titillating content in movies and games and have been constantly successful. This entire current censorship spree was started by liberals crying about No Mercy, a game about rape. Stop fear mongering about a conservative boogey man.
All NSFW games on Itch are now hidden by default.
- Thread starter Bob69
- Start date
Nullx54
Active Member
- Jun 4, 2017
- 742
- 1,202
- 385
This has been brewing for a long time. Credit card processors were waiting for the moment, hell I'd even dare say they even planed this to happen, just so they have the excuse needed to go all out in pushing for total censorship of H-game content as the slow creep in taking complete control everything.
beerpig
Member
- Aug 12, 2023
- 238
- 514
- 194
It's easy to prove this is false.
You must be registered to see the links
Quotes from that page:Last time I checked liberals have extreme disdain towards religion, something conservatives embrace. Liberals are pro-choice, while conservatives want to dictate what women should do with their bodies. Liberals think trans people are OK, conservatives think they should die in a fire.
The woman in question is a conservative, making sure to surround herself with conservatives. She might say she's a feminist but that's bullshit: she walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, and that duck has a big "God hates Fags" sign.
You can blame liberals for a lot of the censorship going on. However in this case it's coming from conservatives.
And all this talk against porn makes a lot of sense from a conservative and Christian point of view:
1. Christianity preaches that you should be pumping children out like there was no tomorrow. People who enjoy porn are less eager to raise a child due to being too horny to think.
2. The existence of porn leaves room for people to get sexual satisfaction. And a satisfied person cannot be a good Christian: a good Christian can't wait for "the kingdom of God" or a similar superstition, to free him from an Earth full of frustrations.
Last edited:
- Jul 24, 2025
- 90
- 170
- 43
RSlash on YouTube used to say "Passion Hugging" when there were stories that had the word SEX.
By the way, there is no such thing as a pro life feminist. Either she is FEMINIST or Pro Life.
The entry was probably written by a LGBT Wikipedia editor.
Nullx54
Active Member
- Jun 4, 2017
- 742
- 1,202
- 385
A lot of these people are very ill intent towards children, they just hide it will. That is why they use that angle to guilt people into siding with them, not knowing that they would have a lot of a horrid pizza on stashed somewhere. When they say "Think the children", they think of them the same way a milflover would see one with massive tits and ass spreading her legs to invite you in.
Even the "best" among time see children as tools to be brainwashed into becoming their loyal servants rather than young people that need protection and nurturing as they grow up to become independent. Anything time I hear people use that angle is where I'd feel no sympathy should anything terrible happen to them as they almost gleefully use kids living shield for their agenda.
I got no reason nor right to judge them but this two-faced behavior and lack of honesty is like a stream of bile that spews out and hurts everyone just because they can't make peace with their own lust is worth condemning and it ain't justified. Not at all.
However I do agree that Parents should also do a better job in teaching their children about Internet protection rather than just be completely ignorant as it takes away the excuse of the former group that use them for their agenda and it keeps them safe against anyone that would try and groom them so they can get said person exposed ASAP.
What I fear about the idea of "acceptable porn" as others have mentioned, is that it will be standarized through all the posible funding platforms and become the norm "in the way patreon handles it".
Say, if a dev has content or a "side game" that deviates from say norm, platforms would negate service or ban that dev (similar to how patreon can suspend your account for "offsite" activity, like having a twitter or pixiv with content against their guidelines, as they "dont condone a creator usingtheir platform for activities they dont like. Which is basically controlling all the creator's life and work activity based on them just being in patreon, or risking denying of service).
If steam or itch or other platforms were to follow this path (i hope not) then the pressure on devs would be really big to conform to only make content demeed "acceptable porn"or risk the whole (now censored) ecosystem denying them.
So, if that were to happen, a new alternative would need to be (from a profit view) attractive enough to justify losing the posibility to be on patreon or steam or itch (those game would probably not be there to begin with), or basically every dev would need to work on dual projects (one of profitable acceptable porn, the other "forbidden") with different aliases to hide themselves, or just do it as a hobby, which as it has already been discussed, will diminish the time, quality or resources destined to make good games, and restrict the devs and projects that could "survive" under this conditions.
It appears that a future "bottleneck" of games and devs becomes more and more a reality.
I do hope the mayority eventually turns against this draconian measures. Controlling fiction wont make reality better. Solving problems in reality will.
Say, if a dev has content or a "side game" that deviates from say norm, platforms would negate service or ban that dev (similar to how patreon can suspend your account for "offsite" activity, like having a twitter or pixiv with content against their guidelines, as they "dont condone a creator usingtheir platform for activities they dont like. Which is basically controlling all the creator's life and work activity based on them just being in patreon, or risking denying of service).
If steam or itch or other platforms were to follow this path (i hope not) then the pressure on devs would be really big to conform to only make content demeed "acceptable porn"or risk the whole (now censored) ecosystem denying them.
So, if that were to happen, a new alternative would need to be (from a profit view) attractive enough to justify losing the posibility to be on patreon or steam or itch (those game would probably not be there to begin with), or basically every dev would need to work on dual projects (one of profitable acceptable porn, the other "forbidden") with different aliases to hide themselves, or just do it as a hobby, which as it has already been discussed, will diminish the time, quality or resources destined to make good games, and restrict the devs and projects that could "survive" under this conditions.
It appears that a future "bottleneck" of games and devs becomes more and more a reality.
I do hope the mayority eventually turns against this draconian measures. Controlling fiction wont make reality better. Solving problems in reality will.
beerpig
Member
- Aug 12, 2023
- 238
- 514
- 194
The editor is reporting what she claims to be, not what she is.
DLsite managed to find a loophoole to get around their bullshit and still take western CC payments without having to fully comply, though they hid a number of products with certain tags from non-JP customers now (mainly loli stuff). We will see if other smaller sites start to look for workarounds or alternative payment methods. You know these types of people will never be satisfied once they gain traction, and will start pushing for more categories to be banned.
♍VoidTraveler
Conversation Conqueror
- Apr 14, 2021
- 6,162
- 17,709
- 803
That's like banning violence in games.
Just imagine what would happen if you suddenly banned violence in games.
Underground market of marginalisez gamedev scene with anonymous transactions. News reports about "horrible pervent that was ready to rape innocent got jailed for 10 years, heres is proof, 12 mb pixel game with rape on defeat". Japan gona make iron curtain that forbids anyone outside jp ip to download ero games, until megacorps gets foothold in it and push same shit.
Pay transactories gona do this because they hate grey area eco and would gladly murder everyone involved ,both us and devs, just like cartels they are, but total ban is fine too; zealots of both left wing and right gona love it because they just want to hurt other people pretending they are good guys; goverment and police will be happy since jailing neets that masturbate to pictures is far easier than fighting IRL RAPE GANGS/SLAVE MARKETS, especialy if part of those gangs are their relatives/buisness partness(see iran,russia,united kingdom); normies gona either cheer or ignore because "i dont care,surely those bad people deserve it, surely my little kink will not be targeted im a good guy afterall, hello mr officer why are you banging at my door with swat team behind you?".
Anyone who is not in 100% vanilla consensual sex between 21 year olds people gona get same treatment as LGBT did in Germany after Beer Hall Putsch. Sexual revolution backwards.
add
oh trust me bro, "EVIL NOSEX GEMS" are next on the list, since gaben already threw a white flag, no reason to stopThat's like banning violence in games.
Just imagine what would happen if you suddenly banned violence in games.
Last edited:
♍VoidTraveler
Conversation Conqueror
- Apr 14, 2021
- 6,162
- 17,709
- 803
Well in his defense, not like he could actually fight his own money pipelines... sadly. But.. maybe they DO have plans now.. like creating their very own, STEAM card... slowly making it spread across the world... maybe even becoming serious contender to visa/mastercard, eventually... For steam, it could be possible to pull off.. Not instantly of course, but bit by bit.
Because something needs to be done about those payment processors, this kind of shit always happens when someone gets a monopoly or near-monopoly on something, they inevitably start dictating their bullshit on everyone else at some point..
Monopoly needs to be stamped out with brutal efficiency, wherever it could be found.
- Jul 27, 2025
- 43
- 10
- 8
technically, most banks use MasterCard or Visa based Debit to Online interactions.
Buddy, this is the same with the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, which is the official full name of North Korea, and the National Socialist German Workers' Party, which was the official name of the Nazi Party.
We both agree that the former is not a democratic republic and the latter wasn't a socialist workers' party.
It is a basic social facade, just to look better in the eyes of the average public, because I shit you not, if they said "I am a Christian(evangelical) fundamentalist who thinks abortion is wrong because my belief said so", very few people would care and give support to them.
Honestly at this point im ready to just sign checks and send them by post.
Elf Truck
Newbie
- Feb 1, 2023
- 23
- 74
- 104
Problem is you can get blacklisted by banks the same way, and if credit card companies blacklist someone, the banks will probably follow, it's a very incestuous (the irony!) industry. All they have to do is cite some vague "brand risk" or "prohibited activity" and you don't get to see the rules you need to follow becasue they're made up on the fly.
