2.00 star(s) 1 Vote

Caprine2fine

New Member
Nov 4, 2024
6
3
The target audience of the first game was not homosexuals. So fans of the first such as myself hate this and gay people will hate the first one which will eat into sales of them playing the second.
I do not understand why he did this
 

defnotalt

Active Member
Jul 13, 2021
588
2,072
That's... an interesting choice. I checked their last game and I immediately recognized it, but it was 100% straight as far as I remember (and as far as the tags tell me). Not sure making a game containing gay/futa as a sequel for a 100% straight furry game is a good choice, but hey, it's fine by me :KappaPride:
 
  • Like
Reactions: jester89G

moohoo

Member
May 13, 2018
154
443
That's... an interesting choice. I checked their last game and I immediately recognized it, but it was 100% straight as far as I remember (and as far as the tags tell me). Not sure making a game containing gay/futa as a sequel for a 100% straight furry game is a good choice, but hey, it's fine by me :KappaPride:
Well whats the mix? If it is just like a token femboy that I can completely ignore then who cares. If we're approaching large chunk then maybe its worth being concerned.
 

Laundryviking

Member
Jun 28, 2021
239
50
Shit this got updated?Thought it was never gonna get a demo 2 or something.Gonna have to replay it cuz i deleted the game ughhhhhh
 
Feb 12, 2020
208
526
The target audience of the first game was not homosexuals. So fans of the first such as myself hate this and gay people will hate the first one which will eat into sales of them playing the second.
I do not understand why he did this
"The developer is going to lose sales like mine, a person who did not buy the game to begin with."

Flawless.

Also ye people only make art for profit no other reason. And also gay/bi furries definitely aren't the majority of the furries.

Also gay content means straight content is unplayable... somehow.
 

Caprine2fine

New Member
Nov 4, 2024
6
3
"The developer is going to lose sales like mine, a person who did not buy the game to begin with."

Flawless.

Also ye people only make art for profit no other reason. And also gay/bi furries definitely aren't the majority of the furries.

Also gay content means straight content is unplayable... somehow.
Eyes=sales the first game was free
I'm not trying to debate homosexual content thing because that was not my main point.
It's that when sequel change so differently from the original; it always pisses people off.
That's what spinoffs are for, which this game was originally supposed to be.

You can make art in private for yourself, the dev shared it on the Internet so I am allowed to scrutinize it
 
Feb 12, 2020
208
526
Eyes=sales the first game was free
I'm not trying to debate homosexual content thing because that was not my main point.
It's that when sequel change so differently from the original; it always pisses people off.
That's what spinoffs are for, which this game was originally supposed to be.

You can make art in private for yourself, the dev shared it on the Internet so I am allowed to scrutinize it
So the game was free and yet you criticize them for not considering the "sales" that they are missing.

Flawless reasoning.

Also, you're free to criticize something for whatever reason.

But you're also allowed to be criticized for thinking it has to be catered to you, specifically.

Which, to be clear, is what you're doing. You're not complaining about quality, you're complaining about not being the sole target demographic. You're not even complaining about it being "forced" on the player, you're objecting to it being included at all.

The dev made a choice to include it, either for their personal interest or by request (probably the former considering Bunnygotchi had gay stuff).

You are essentially coming to an open party where they're serving ham sandwiches and turkey sandwiches and complaining that you only wanted ham sandwiches, but now there's turkey around, and it ruins the whole thing.

No one invited you. You can always just leave.
 

Caprine2fine

New Member
Nov 4, 2024
6
3
So the game was free and yet you criticize them for not considering the "sales" that they are missing.

Flawless reasoning.

Also, you're free to criticize something for whatever reason.

But you're also allowed to be criticized for thinking it has to be catered to you, specifically.

Which, to be clear, is what you're doing. You're not complaining about quality, you're complaining about not being the sole target demographic. You're not even complaining about it being "forced" on the player, you're objecting to it being included at all.

The dev made a choice to include it, either for their personal interest or by request (probably the former considering Bunnygotchi had gay stuff).

You are essentially coming to an open party where they're serving ham sandwiches and turkey sandwiches and complaining that you only wanted ham sandwiches, but now there's turkey around, and it ruins the whole thing.

No one invited you. You can always just leave.
you are correct both logically and morally
 

fakklan

Newbie
Mar 16, 2018
73
182
Why is voiceover baked into Sound Effects? I want to have sound effects but without the cringe voiceover.
 

traplover19

Active Member
Nov 4, 2018
847
1,190
i thought my game was broken for a considerably longer time then i like to admit until i realized thats by design
 
2.00 star(s) 1 Vote