Can anyone help me identifiy this adult actress?

Seewolf

Active Member
Feb 27, 2019
566
1,405
I only have a link of a with her. (I hope this isn't against the rules to post it. I am in no way affiliated to that site. This is just for identifying her.) The video description unfortunately isn't helpful, because the name of the actress isn't mentioned. Looks a little bit like an amateur or onlyfans shooting, but as it seems this a mofos-network vid. Hence I do have hopes, that she can be identified. I find her to be incredibly hot (at least in this vid), hence I'd like to check out for more of her content. But without a name it's futile.

blonde_hottie full display.jpg

blonde_hottie bj.jpg


blonde_hottie.jpg


source:
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: NeonSelf

Seewolf

Active Member
Feb 27, 2019
566
1,405
Thanks mate for the info! I'm using firefox on private mode and afaik there is no image search function.
Since I'm almost exclusively using firefox I left the possibility of a reverse image search out of consideration. Thanks for reminding me. This will be helpful in the future (y)
I've already found the amazing full vid, now that I've got her name. Unfortunately this is also one of her best vids already.
Sometimes it's strange. You might find an actress incredibly hot and appealing in a certain video like the one mentioned above, but when you look at some of her other videos she loses most of her attraction.
 
Last edited:

firsttry51

Member
Feb 25, 2018
319
516
Thanks mate for the info! I'm using firefox on private mode and afaik there is no image search function.
Since I'm almost exclusively using firefox I left the possibility of a reverse image search out of consideration. Thanks for reminding me. This will be helpful in the future (y)
I've already found the amazing full vid, now that I've got her name. Unfortunately this is also one of her best vids already with the exception of a ffm threesome featuring Allie James and Whitney Westgate.
Sometimes it's strange. You might find an actress incredibly hot and appealing in a certain video like the one mentioned above, but when you look at some of her other videos she loses most of her attraction.
makeup, lighting and a good camera man does wonders
 

Seewolf

Active Member
Feb 27, 2019
566
1,405
makeup, lighting and a good camera man does wonders
Indeed! Also some porn actresses should better keep quiet in front of the camera, instead of showing how dumb they really are f.e. in interviews. The latter might cost them lots of attraction as well.
(I've also seen more recent pictures of Allie James with disgusting tunnels in her ears and tattooed all over. She went from really cute & pretty and very much all natural to trash optically. Seems like her active years in the porn industry didn't do her a favor.)
 
Last edited:

firsttry51

Member
Feb 25, 2018
319
516
Thanks mate for the info! I'm using firefox on private mode and afaik there is no image search function.
Since I'm almost exclusively using firefox I left the possibility of a reverse image search out of consideration.
i brought up right click mostly to illustrate how convenient and easy it is, you can just go to google and click search by image

Screenshot (1286).png
 

Seewolf

Active Member
Feb 27, 2019
566
1,405
i brought up right click mostly to illustrate how convenient and easy it is, you can just go to google and click search by image

View attachment 3387765
It's a nice feature, no doubt. I have some personal issues with google, though, mainly because of their fucked-up agenda and political bias. That's why I try to use different search engines mostly. (That's also partly why I use Mozilla Firefox, instead of Google Chrome). I really try to avoid google products.
But your input was nevertheless very helpful.

propaganda.jpg

propaganda 2.jpg
 
Last edited:

Seewolf

Active Member
Feb 27, 2019
566
1,405
so you instead went to elon musk, on twitter????

man that's so funny.
Elon Musk is just pointing it out. He is not the only one, though, just one of the most prominent ones. Twitter also so far doesn't collect my browser history or much of my personal data (I can have a X account without providing any personal info, while f.e. Google insists on my cell phone number). Google is also manipulating web searches. There were even leaks of Google higher ups talking about their agenda and how they plan to manipulate users. Do you want to deny all that? Because that's even funnier.

Since Musk took over, Twitter is probably one of the very few big tech social media giants, which more or less allows free speech unlike Facebook & Instagram (Meta), YouTube (belongs to Google), Reddit, Tiktok etc. Most social media platforms have implemented very much one sided harsh censorship, while X removed most of the extremely biased censorship, thanks to Musk.

I’m not an uncritical Musk fanboy (I reject the idea of transhumanism f.e.), but he isn’t wrong concerning a lot of things. So yeah absolutely, better Musk and X than fucked up, leftist, woke and manipulative Google. The big difference is btw: on X leftists can post their bs, because of free speech (there are boundaries ofc like calls for murder and so on), just as much as conservatives and right wingers have a right to voice their opinions on X, while Google censors everything, which isn't leftist and woke enough.
 
Last edited:

Jaike

Well-Known Member
Aug 24, 2020
1,601
6,254
I warmly recommend to avoid Google for normal reverse image search. Not for politics, but because it's fucking garbage at finding stuff, the only good thing about it is the image source function. and are way better.

And you can use to find Allie James' shoots before her "transformation".
 
  • Like
Reactions: Seewolf