- Oct 11, 2023
- 223
- 707
can we delete all "AI CG" games
- Thread starter tewewe
- Start date
- Aug 3, 2017
- 987
- 2,018
You can't decide for others what they like or find good, you can only decide for yourself.
This isn't a field, your inability to use the search function and scroll past AND ignore things you don't like is not AI or anyone else's fault, it's your own.
Because it was a new technology and some made fault claims of new technologies destroying old ways of doing things....
Seriously, look up the word "context" then re-read the thread....
You must be registered to see the links
Well don't let us keep you, you're welcome to "not be on this site" more often...
Many of the games on archive.org and no longer for sale
Ah a representative of the people who think servers run on magic and pixie dust....
- Oct 11, 2023
- 223
- 707
- Jan 21, 2022
- 8,751
- 16,870
You mistake common sense for "enthusiast." Those of us with calm minds aren't Pro AI -- we simply aren't rabid hyperbolists who think anyone with a differing opinion is "the enemy," even if the differing opinion is neither love nor hate, simply objectiveness.
- Jan 21, 2022
- 8,751
- 16,870
I deleted it because I thought I'd be a bit civil, but you want me to go there?
Why should we entertain the opinion of someone who is vapid and vacant to the point that they do not have the wherewithal or the common courtesy to use the REPLY or QUOTE button so that people can know what conversation they are pulling the shit out of their diapers and throwing it around the room.
No one is upset but those frothing at the mouth with hatred.
- Apr 3, 2020
- 493
- 1,292
Again 0 examples, there has been proven 0 people that trully live a happy life with 0 downs coz its impossible ofc
Fun fact, I was one and now I dont care bout it at all, most long term soccer fans they do it coz its a very good tool to bound with other people and go watch matches together
Yes thats the curent state, but I only talk about the future when programing/scripts etc will also be fully AI generated in seconds, literally games/VNs will just be made with a prompt, thats the end goal
But I know what happened 1000 years ago, and what happens right now in different parts of the world, I dont get ur point, you talk like a granma that still dont know what internet does
You realise handmade knifes were produced on x88888% scale than they are today right? and thats literally my point?? and just coz you bring an article from 2023 that is still not even moving an inch to how much we had before and the fact that you dont even wanna accept that fact that handmade crafts demand went from 100% to under 1% today its crazy how you defend this, like in what world can a demand drop to 99%+ and still not being affected? just as you said real art/artists wont be affected by automatizing every art.
Ok thanks for agreeing with me that what you said was dumb and indeed you can fact check the future with the past. Also ur example is so bad lol, we never had a program to automatize any art in 1 second and can be used by everyone with 0 experience, until AI we still only had artists that make art from 0, but with AI you dont need to be an artists to make AI art, even a dog can mash his paw on a keyboard with an AI prompt open and create "art" also is dumb to even use the AI and art together since technically by every deffinition AI art is not art nor you can be an artist if you are using AI to make the "art" for you.
- Apr 3, 2020
- 493
- 1,292
yes still nobody bring any value AI create beside just making more of what we already have on different variants and that itself just make every art be less valued and appreciated by everyone.
What is more impressive/valued/most apreciated? something only very few artists can do or something everyone with 0 experience can do with just typing what you want and it gonna appear on your screen? Would people go watch Circus performances if they would perform basic stuffs everyone can do like walking on 2 feet? No they go watch something only very few people can do. I don't hate AI just for fun or coz is something new etc, I only hate it coz I know it gonna make every art much less appreciated and thats gonna be a big minus for the things I enjoy. I don't even care how good AI is or how much better it gonna get, I know it will one day gonna start creating flawless arts and everyone can just type a prompt and get the perfect art they want but at that time when we gonna have that, people wont apreciate that anymore. So right know most people apreciate much more lower quality works than we gonna appreciate in the future when everyone and their cat will can create it. I am not even anti AI in general, i know AI in other domains will help us go quicker into a fully automated world where we dont need to work anymore, but at the same time it also gonna take away stuffs we enjoy today when AI will monotonize that action (like creating any art you want with a prompt).
- Jan 21, 2022
- 8,751
- 16,870
I'm not going to read a word vomit.
Again, like you have with others in this conversation - you're misrepresenting what we're saying and just spewing forth whatever comes to your mind instead of actually responding to the comment presented.
I said:
You mistake common sense for "enthusiast." Those of us with calm minds aren't Pro AI -- we simply aren't rabid hyperbolists who think anyone with a differing opinion is "the enemy," even if the differing opinion is neither love nor hate, simply objectiveness.
Nothing you said was in anyway connected to what I said.
- Apr 3, 2020
- 493
- 1,292
For real now, people that are pro AI art, they really still believe they gonna enjoy art anymore once AI will start creating any art flawlessly and everyone can do it? we enjoy art because is made by an artists and we like the art he create and coz is something new, once everyone can do it, then it gonna lose all that what we wanted and everyone will go back to real porn/art. Is funny coz thats the reason a lot of people switched to hentai/2d/3d porn is coz internet is flooded with real porn or at least they got bored of it for a while.
- Apr 3, 2020
- 493
- 1,292
But you threat people who is not on the same boat as you as enemies, interesting room temperature IQ take
- Jan 21, 2022
- 8,751
- 16,870
No, I do not.
Thank you for answering with a direct response.
How about answers from people who are not Pro AI art, but see it as a tool like other digital applications?
As one of those --
Yes, I already do enjoy art created by humans and will continue to do so. So much so that my eldest is at an a reputable art college studying for their career as an artist. Even with all the caveats you added to your question. yes.
If you are going to ask of people's opinions - just ask straight forward questions.
Just ask "Are you going to enjoy human-drawn art once AI generated art becomes commonplace?"
The answer is still yes.
Last edited:
- Aug 3, 2017
- 987
- 2,018
I fail to see the need to waste time sourcing your tailored nonsense, you are also again ignoring the points made like you have in my previous replies...
Source?
First, the end goal for who?
Second, I thought it so obvious in your previous replies I didn't address it but it seems that was an oversight on my part....
The processing power needed in personal computers to allow an AI to create via a prompt and entire game is decades if not more away and even then you are conveniently leaving out some key details, once again showing you lack of understanding and knowledge base.
To start with, for an AI to create an entire game from scratch with just prompt inputs it would have to go one of two routes,
One : create an engine entirely from scratch for each type of game, this would then require debugging, alpha testing, beta testing, etc. and then would have to be compatibility checked not to mention getting signed etc.
NONE of which can be done by AI ANYTIME SOON
Two: Use an existing engine, at this point it invalidates you entire argument as the engine would first have to be acquired and the AI did NOT create the entire game alone via prompts.
Next, unless the music / sound industry and individuals give up all rights to copy right materials, it would again have to go one of two routes.
One, create from scratch all sound effects, sounds and music to add to the game
Two, use existing sound effects, sounds and music, again at this point it invalidates you entire argument as the sound effects, sounds and music would first have to be acquired and the AI did NOT create the entire game alone via prompts.
Your entire argument is based on you making stuff up and your lack of understanding and knowledge base.
My point is you claimed
...and my point was you don't!
Notice you don't give a year, decade or century...wonder why that is?
Source on statistics of numbers made over the years and source on "went from 100% to under 1% today"
I'm not taking your word on that. I also did a search to see if you were right and couldn't find a single statistic.
Firstly, you are the ONLY one placing the limit of 1 second on anything, your made up numbers don't concern me or anyone.
Secondly, you again show your lack of understanding and knowledge.
1) Printing of photographs went from dark rooms to download directly to pc
2) Programs like cad influenced the design world
3) Photoshop / illustrator did too
You must be registered to see the links
You must be registered to see the links
You must be registered to see the links
You know that statistically you should have gotten at least one thing right by now, it is astounding how you've managed to get everything so wrong....
So the AI boots itself up one morning and decides it's going to have some java and spend the day making art?
Source / Prove it
You must be registered to see the links
" art, a visual object or experience consciously created through an expression of skill or imagination. "
So you are wrong again... you are wearing out my W R O N G A G A I N keys on my keyboard....