- Mar 11, 2024
- 4
- 2
bans usually do not happen for no reason.View attachment 3430767
One autistic mod apparently never heard of CHARLIE CHAPLIN and banned my account for a second time because somehow that uneducated swine think it's NAZISM .
No foreplay nor lube, you're savage...One autistic mod [...]
Why am I not surprised ?[...] banned my account for a second time [...]
[...] that uneducated swine [...]
What a charming way to ask for something while presenting you as a victim.[...] I would have appreciated that someone would have the decency to tell me [...] this is just a severe case of stupidity, [...] that doofus is part of the staff, which is dangerous.
Was probably a little more than just a PFP.I'm usually on the mods side, but if you were really banned from a site that houses shit like necrophilia, just because of a PFP that's a bit scuffed... that's kinda fucked up.
Ah, I see. Yeah, totally justified.Was probably a little more than just a PFP.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
I know who Charlie Chaplin is and I also know how old his wives wereView attachment 3430767
One autistic mod apparently never heard of CHARLIE CHAPLIN and banned my account for a second time because somehow that uneducated swine think it's NAZISM .
No foreplay nor lube, you're savage...
If that picture really is the only reason for the ban other than ban evasion, it's pretty much justified tho. That someone could see Chaplin's face and think "OMG Hitler!" is itself a worry, but if you see that fake party logo and still no alarm bells ring...What a charming way to ask for something while presenting you as a victim.
"Like my sainted mum used to say: Get 'em young enough and the possibilities are endless."I know who Charlie Chaplin is and I also know how old his wives were
As he said himself, it's his second ban, and he have two tickets opened... So I doubt that it's the only reason.If that picture really is the only reason for the ban other than ban evasion, it's pretty much justified tho.
It was used as profile picture, and not limited to the face since the hand was included. A bit less obvious that it's Chaplin under those conditions.That someone could see Chaplin's face and think "OMG Hitler!" is itself a worry, [...]
I saw it, it was still in the "really obvious" zone. Especially if you considered the party logo.It was used as profile picture, and not limited to the face since the hand was included. A bit less obvious that it's Chaplin under those conditions.
Hmm, from memory he was the one who fought the stronger against the creation of an union inside United Artists. But Hoover hated him, so my memory can be wrong.[...] admit a socialist actor [...]
Even champagne socialists are still socialists. Though it seems Chaplin called himself an anarchist, doesn't change the central point too much tho.Hmm, from memory he was the one who fought the stronger against the creation of an union inside United Artists. But Hoover hated him, so my memory can be wrong.