Before you do remove it just wanted to say that scene is from a site whose whole theme is "unprofessional" and have many scenes where the girls just walk out. Mya not only chose to keep going and finish that shoot but then has come back for like 4 more scenes with them. Not saying the guys aren't complete dirt bags, cause they are, but she did actually "consent" to everything and could have stoped it at any time.That's Mya McKay. However, I'm removing this scene in the next version after watching more of the source material. They were completely unprofessional with her and I'm not comfortable it's included.
That's Slave #1 from Bitchslapped, one website gives her name as "Gabbi".who is the actress in puppy_brunette and slave_brunette scene in stage 5 and 6? Where can I find the orginal video?
No chance, I'm afraid. Any video would definitely break my rule on consenting professionals! I'm not sure I could write it either. It's not beyond the protagonist but it is beyond this creator.View attachment 2315993
Any plans for beast like alluded to here?
Yeah, completely valid, agree with everything you've said. The clip was perfect too. I just try to use best judgement and I can't know how much pressure she was under to stay, but I could see the pressure they put her under to leave. Specifically, in the clip I used I saw she wasn't acting, it was a conversation between performers, so that sealed it for me – what's the point of the fiction if the real scene is abusive? I thought hard about a James Deen scene's inclusion too, but his partner in that scene hasn't made any allegations and was dating him... So it's there for now unless Chanel Preston tells me otherwise. I suppose my rationale is if I want to explore themes like the above in a fantasy, I want to be confident nobody was exploited in reality. Hard task in porn.Before you do remove it just wanted to say that scene is from a site whose whole theme is "unprofessional" and have many scenes where the girls just walk out. Mya not only chose to keep going and finish that shoot but then has come back for like 4 more scenes with them. Not saying the guys aren't complete dirt bags, cause they are, but she did actually "consent" to everything and could have stoped it at any time.
I think I've seen it all now. An adult game creator, whose fictional creation's premise is the pure embodiment of illegality and fuck-up'edness were it to occur in reality, struggling to internalize his game because he can't determine whether the source material he uses is kosher or not. He really ought to to take a step back and look at what he's making - because this self-censoring shtick isn't in anyone's best interest. There's no soap box to stand on...Specifically, in the clip I used I saw she wasn't acting, it was a conversation between performers, so that sealed it for me – what's the point of the fiction if the real scene is abusive? I thought hard about a James Deen scene's inclusion too, but his partner in that scene hasn't made any allegations and was dating him... So it's there for now unless Chanel Preston tells me otherwise. I suppose my rationale is if I want to explore themes like the above in a fantasy, I want to be confident nobody was exploited in reality. Hard task in porn.
PS. Besides moral handwringing...
I don't see a problem w/his concern and self-censoring. What's the dev is making here is pure fantasy. What he's talking about is actual abuse. I like jerking it to porn involving degradation and humiliation, but if it looks like the woman isn't into it, it's not hot. Consent is king.I think I've seen it all now. An adult game creator, whose fictional creation's premise is the pure embodiment of illegality and fuck-up'edness were it to occur in reality, struggling to internalize his game because he can't determine whether the source material he uses is kosher or not. He really ought to to take a step back and look at what he's making - because this self-censoring shtick isn't in anyone's best interest. There's no soap box to stand on...
Ensuring actual people weren't harmed or coerced in reality while filming a fictionalized script isn't a soap-box, it's basic human decency.I think I've seen it all now. An adult game creator, whose fictional creation's premise is the pure embodiment of illegality and fuck-up'edness were it to occur in reality, struggling to internalize his game because he can't determine whether the source material he uses is kosher or not. He really ought to to take a step back and look at what he's making - because this self-censoring shtick isn't in anyone's best interest. There's no soap box to stand on...
I agree with you completely. The fact that A. the scene still apparently exists ( he got a hold of it, didn't he?) - and - B. As pointed out, said actress apparently went back to work for them again several times - shows that is was consensual. Why would she keep going back otherwise? I would imagine that if there were any illegality to it that scene would have been taken down via the proper authorities, no?Ensuring actual people weren't harmed or coerced in reality while filming a fictionalized script isn't a soap-box, it's basic human decency.
Never said that either - that was you putting words in my mouth based on whatever's rattling around in your head.If the game or a movie depicted beatings and non-consensual assault, you think it would be fine to use videos of the real thing? WTF man.
Thanks a lot for the compression but most gifs aren't playing. I tried to open the files in question in multiple browsers and media players, none worked.A compressed version 0.3.2 of the game
9282 -> 2746
You must be registered to see the links
I have the same issue...Thanks a lot for the compression but most gifs aren't playing. I tried to open the files in question in multiple browsers and media players, none worked.