Unity Corrupting Mia [v0.10.1] [Boola]

[GooglePlix]

Version 10.2, bugs:
1. The gallery, yes, it has become larger, but now it has spaces and it is still not big enough to cover all the pictures in the game(The third picture is the end of the gallery.), which is very sad.

Spoiler: Image

You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.

2. Achievements still do not work, and this achievement in particular is bugged, since the condition check for this achievement: either relies on just one condition (- will Mia sleep with Bob in a tent?), or relies on global variables, because it can be obtained even if Mia sleeps with Bob only in a tent, and before that, she will be satisfied with only the main character (perhaps the problem is precisely in the global variables).

Spoiler: Image

You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.

3. I can't say for sure about this, but it seems like an extra line break has been dragged somewhere, because there is quite enough space for the entire line, or I did not notice this in the previous version 10.1.

Spoiler: Image

You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.

Update:
The notification bug still hasn't been fixed.

Spoiler: Image

You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.

There's a really weird issue with achievements; I had to edit the achievements file, but they still aren't showing up.

Spoiler: Image

You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.

 

[Chienrouge]

Bro, you’re using AI to steal people’s art and make money off of it. You’re probably using it to steal coding too, given the bugs. Who’s the real thief?

I see your point, but he also spends hours and hours creating a game and sharing it. It's not nothing. So, I'm not shocked when he says things like "Bro, you do nothing but complaining as I do the hard work that you just want to "steal" and use freely with the full benefit of an after-sales service. ".

 

[CAPTAIN DIDDLES]

I see your point, but he also spends hours and hours creating a game and sharing it. It's not nothing. So, I'm not shocked when he says things like "Bro, you do nothing but complaining as I do the hard work that you just want to "steal" and use freely with the full benefit of an after-sales service. ".

I don’t think you’ve really got the moral right to claim any ownership over, much less profit off of, something you made in large part through stealing other people’s work. If you want to use gen ai and put it out for free, that’s… fine, I guess (still didn’t get permission from the artists whose data was scraped, but I won’t split hairs). If you want to make it with all your own art, assets, coding, and writing, then charge money for it, that’s fine too. But you don’t get to have your cake *and* throw it at the walls of your glass house.

 

[testergon]

dead?

 

[Bulik98]

I don’t think you’ve really got the moral right to claim any ownership over, much less profit off of, something you made in large part through stealing other people’s work. If you want to use gen ai and put it out for free, that’s… fine, I guess (still didn’t get permission from the artists whose data was scraped, but I won’t split hairs). If you want to make it with all your own art, assets, coding, and writing, then charge money for it, that’s fine too. But you don’t get to have your cake *and* throw it at the walls of your glass house.

Dude, you're living in your own fantasy world. Do you think every IT product is 100% written by a single company? Wrong! Open any project, and you'll see dependencies containing ready-made solutions from other developers. I can confidently say that no project is 100% written by a single team or a single developer. We all use open-source frameworks and libraries. And these open-source libraries are specifically available for use. The team developing AI models for image generation makes them publicly available. And sells future models with improved graphics. If you don't want your code or AI model used without your permission, don't publish it. If you publish it, you give permission.

 

[Bulik98]

Imagine you've programmed several functions and created a library from them. You then made your code publicly available for other developers to use.

But one of the developers was working for another country's military and decided not to write the code himself, but to use yours to solve a problem. Then, your country's secret service comes to you and asks why your code is being used for military purposes in another country. What would you tell them? You'd say you're not responsible for how or by whom your code was used, and you want nothing to do with it.

BUT if a multi-billion dollar company uses your open source code, you'll write them an angry letter, "Where's my money?"

 

[Al500]

You literally cannot load saves, how is this still not fixed?

 

[Chienrouge]

You literally cannot load saves, how is this still not fixed?

You just created a loophole. It's the point of nearly all posts since Sunday.
Go back to there and all is explained

 

[Serenity Life]

Spoiler

You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.

Hey.
I'm agree with you — just want to clarify one thing though. If you're working with a free base model from something like Daz Studio and build your own stuff on top of it (Victoria 3, Genesis 7, whatever), then sell it commercially — you're completely in the clear. Daz actually encourages this. Their devs can't come after you because they explicitly want creators to build and sell products based on their base figures and tools.

With AI-generated images, it's even more open. There's no single "owner" of the AI models themselves — most are distributed freely. But here's the thing: if you publish on CivitAI, you've got full control over your work. You can disable downloads, restrict redistribution, prevent people from training LoRAs based on your models — all the way up to subscription-only or donation-based access if you want.

So yeah, you're absolutely right — I just thought it's worth spelling this out for anyone who's not familiar with the legal side of things. Honestly, I only figured all this out myself fairly recently.

 

[Serenity Life]

I don’t think you’ve really got the moral right to claim any ownership over, much less profit off of, something you made in large part through stealing other people’s work. If you want to use gen ai and put it out for free, that’s… fine, I guess (still didn’t get permission from the artists whose data was scraped, but I won’t split hairs). If you want to make it with all your own art, assets, coding, and writing, then charge money for it, that’s fine too. But you don’t get to have your cake *and* throw it at the walls of your glass house.

Hey there.

I honestly don't get the logic behind your accusation — if there's any at all. You sound more like a troll than someone making a serious argument. But even if you're not, your claims are baseless and, frankly, pretty silly.

Spoiler: TEXT

You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.

So... I'd suggest you check the facts before throwing accusations around. Right now, your words carry about as much weight as... a vacuum.

Spoiler: Overall

You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.

1. “Presumption of innocence applies — you can’t accuse someone of copyright infringement without proof.”
2. According to standard copyright law (e.g., DMCA in the US), using openly licensed or freely distributed models does not constitute infringement.

 

[CAPTAIN DIDDLES]

Dude, you're living in your own fantasy world. Do you think every IT product is 100% written by a single company? Wrong! Open any project, and you'll see dependencies containing ready-made solutions from other developers. I can confidently say that no project is 100% written by a single team or a single developer. We all use open-source frameworks and libraries. And these open-source libraries are specifically available for use. The team developing AI models for image generation makes them publicly available. And sells future models with improved graphics. If you don't want your code or AI model used without your permission, don't publish it. If you publish it, you give permission.

the resources in open source libraries are explicitly made open source by their creators. They give consent for them to be used freely. The AI tools you use scrape the web at large and use, as part of their training data, the work of people who never consented to such. Generative AI isn’t in any way comparable to open source libraries.

 

[CAPTAIN DIDDLES]

Hey there.

I honestly don't get the logic behind your accusation — if there's any at all. You sound more like a troll than someone making a serious argument. But even if you're not, your claims are baseless and, frankly, pretty silly.

Spoiler: TEXT

You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.

So... I'd suggest you check the facts before throwing accusations around. Right now, your words carry about as much weight as... a vacuum.

Spoiler: Overall

You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.

1. “Presumption of innocence applies — you can’t accuse someone of copyright infringement without proof.”
2. According to standard copyright law (e.g., DMCA in the US), using openly licensed or freely distributed models does not constitute infringement.

What do you think I am, a lawyer? I’m arguing ethics and morality, not making an accusation of criminality. My issue isn’t stealing someone’s model. I wouldn’t care if they did. My issue is that these models use works as part of their training data without the consent of their creators. Anything produced by them is morally, definitionally, plagiaristic. Making money off of the output of these models is an even worse affront.

 

[Serenity Life]

What do you think I am, a lawyer? I’m arguing ethics and morality, not making an accusation of criminality. My issue isn’t stealing someone’s model. I wouldn’t care if they did. My issue is that these models use works as part of their training data without the consent of their creators. Anything produced by them is morally, definitionally, plagiaristic. Making money off of the output of these models is an even worse affront.

You keep mixing up using data with stealing it — and that’s a pretty fundamental misunderstanding of how AI training works.

Spoiler: Answer Number 1

You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.

The only thing that's actually immoral in this discussion is accusing someone of theft by literally calling them a "thief" outright.

Spoiler: Answer Number 2

You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.

Think about this: you accuse the author of plagiarism or theft, yet you're using the result of his long, hard work — for free... isn't that the height of hypocrisy?

Spoiler: Answer Number 3: Final

You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.

 

[CAPTAIN DIDDLES]

You keep mixing up using data with stealing it — and that’s a pretty fundamental misunderstanding of how AI training works.

Spoiler: Answer Number 1

You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.

The only thing that's actually immoral in this discussion is accusing someone of theft by literally calling them a "thief" outright.

Spoiler: Answer Number 2

You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.

Think about this: you accuse the author of plagiarism or theft, yet you're using the result of his long, hard work — for free... isn't that the height of hypocrisy?

Spoiler: Answer Number 3: Final

You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.

One human taking inspiration from the work of others is a transformative process. They contribute their own creativity and ideas, creating a distinct and novel work. In cases where they don’t contribute enough of their own creativity, we regard it as plagiarism, or at the very least call it derivative and unoriginal. Generative AI isn’t a conscious entity and can’t contribute anything to a work. It simply outputs the average of its training data, which as I mentioned, is comprised in large part of stolen work. It’s like instead of stealing a car, you steal car parts from many different people and put them together into a car.

also, yeah, piracy is a form of theft, and I partake in it, but I think it’s a lesser form of theft than selling other peoples’ work as your own, and my original complaint was the creator bitching and whining about the game being “stolen” and uploaded on this site when its production involved a more egregious form of theft. How are you going to complain about somebody stealing something that you stole in the first place?

 

[dontseemeeee]

One human taking inspiration from the work of others is a transformative process. They contribute their own creativity and ideas, creating a distinct and novel work. In cases where they don’t contribute enough of their own creativity, we regard it as plagiarism, or at the very least call it derivative and unoriginal. Generative AI isn’t a conscious entity and can’t contribute anything to a work. It simply outputs the average of its training data, which as I mentioned, is comprised in large part of stolen work. It’s like instead of stealing a car, you steal car parts from many different people and put them together into a car.

also, yeah, piracy is a form of theft, and I partake in it, but I think it’s a lesser form of theft than selling other peoples’ work as your own, and my original complaint was the creator bitching and whining about the game being “stolen” and uploaded on this site when its production involved a more egregious form of theft. How are you going to complain about somebody stealing something that you stole in the first place?

Whats the point of complaining about the ethics of AI here or if you think he should profit off of it, people will pay for it if they want to and you aren't gonna do anything about it

 

[Cityoftree]

i got a loop bug, after the party and after a while back again at the beginning before the party

 

[Serenity Life]

Spoiler

You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.

Hello again, and once more I want to say: "Congratulations, you screwed up!"
I could answer everything in just 2–5 sentences, like this:

Spoiler

You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.

 

[Serenity Life]

Spoiler

You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.

You’re stepping on your own heels here… and, as a skilled orator would put it, you’re twisting definitions and distorting reality.

Spoiler: Thesis #1 is inconsistent and self-contradictory.

You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.

Spoiler: Thesis #2: Contradiction and Irrelevance

You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.

Spoiler: Thesis #3: Finished Work Publication

You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.

Please tell all atoms in the universe, quarks, gluons, quark-gluon plasmas, etc., that they are plagiarists with no right to exist.

 

[Bulik98]

You’re stepping on your own heels here… and, as a skilled orator would put it, you’re twisting definitions and distorting reality.

Spoiler: Thesis #1 is inconsistent and self-contradictory.

You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.

Spoiler: Thesis #2: Contradiction and Irrelevance

You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.

Spoiler: Thesis #3: Finished Work Publication

You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.

Please tell all atoms in the universe, quarks, gluons, quark-gluon plasmas, etc., that they are plagiarists with no right to exist.

I'm your fan.

 

[Serenity Life]

blah~blah~blah

Dude, stop spouting nonsense, or in my next reply I’ll have to whip up a full-blown multi-page site with an admin panel and pagination.