HTML Course of Temptation [v0.6.0f] [Anthaum]

[voerman]

And when your child is a teenager you want the random encounter where you walk in on them browsing F95zone.
Are life simulators that do not include that even worth playing?

 

[AccidentalGryffindor]

And when your child is a teenager you want the random encounter where you walk in on them browsing F95zone.
Are life simulators that do not include that even worth playing?

I'll be too busy taking college classes in my mid-thirties to walk in on them doing anything.

 

[JustForPorn12]

No, it's Patreon. There were outright non-con scenes in the game in the earlier versions. Those have been removed or altered, all that remains is dub-con, and then in a later patch they made it where you could exit any sexual encounter with the click of a button.

The way this has been implemented over time is that of appeasing terms of service, and not in service of organicly building towards an experience of "no non-con" because the author/audience believes the portrayal of such is icky or something.

huh, thats even worse then...just move to a subscription service that doesn't censor your creative work
i wasnt around at the very beginging, but they definitely responded "this isnt a woman abuse simulator" on their discord when i brought this up a couple months back.

 

[GammaXai]

huh, thats even worse then...just move to a subscription service that doesn't censor your creative work
i wasnt around at the very beginging, but they definitely responded "this isnt a woman abuse simulator" on their discord when i brought this up a couple months back.

I think they all tend to censor in equally silly way.

 

[GokutheG]

huh, thats even worse then...just move to a subscription service that doesn't censor your creative work
i wasnt around at the very beginging, but they definitely responded "this isnt a woman abuse simulator" on their discord when i brought this up a couple months back.

If you want to make money from your work you basically need to be on Patreon. They are like Steam in that aspect.

It could also be that either the dev/fans felt rape wasn't something they wanted to focus on anymore independent of Patreon.

 

[JustForPorn12]

do they?

pretty sure Degrees of Lewdity uses Subscribe Star, and that has full non-con, takes place in *clears throat* "highschool" instead of college, and just includes much more extreme fetishes overall

 

[JustForPorn12]

" It could also be that either the dev/fans felt rape wasn't something they wanted to focus on anymore independent of Patreon"

kinda falls apart if that stuff was in the game already, and scenes were rewritten to remove no?
wouldn't you just leave what exists in and not add more, if you just wanted to focus on different kinks?
also, they add more and more half-assed non-con with each update, like... why include some guy walking in on you in the shower, molesting you, telling you your going to be his bitch, and...then not fucking you because you politely asked him not to, whose that written for?

its not the non-con crowd, and the lead-up itself would already break Patreons "consent" ToS if someone bothered to report them. them molesting you isnt suddenly a-ok just because they dont fuck you if your ask if them not to. same with the cum-milkshakes, the train molestor, the bar molestors, th... you get the idea.

i'm half tempted to report then to patreon just to see if forcing then off to SubscribeStar would bring back the proper non-con

personally, i almost find this half-assed non-con morally worse than full on non-con. "sexual harrasment is cool as long as your dtf" seems worse than just "sexual harassment is bad, if you dont want to get got maybe defend yourself"

 

[GokutheG]

do they?

pretty sure Degrees of Lewdity uses Subscribe Star, and that has full non-con, takes place in *clears throat* "highschool" instead of college, and just includes much more extreme fetishes overall

Yeah SS is a free for all because they decided to ignore the cc companies when they tried to mandate they ban certain content like they did with Patreon. The win for creative freedom comes at the cost of much smaller reach and creators chance to make money is much smaller.

" It could also be that either the dev/fans felt rape wasn't something they wanted to focus on anymore independent of Patreon"

kinda falls apart if that stuff was in the game already, and scenes were rewritten to remove no?
wouldn't you just leave what exists in and not add more, if you just wanted to focus on different kinks?
also, they add more and more half-assed non-con with each update, like... why include some guy walking in on you in the shower, molesting you, telling you your going to be his bitch, and...then not fucking you because you politely asked him not to, whose that written for?

its not the non-con crowd, and the lead-up itself would already break Patreons "consent" ToS if someone bothered to report them. them molesting you isnt suddenly a-ok just because they dont fuck you if your ask if them not to. same with the cum-milkshakes, the train molestor, the bar molestors, th... you get the idea.

i'm half tempted to report then to patreon just to see if forcing then off to SubscribeStar would bring back the proper non-con

DOL whole focus is basically rape. So the dev is probably thought to tap into the market of players who want a life sim without worrying about rape.

Reporting them would only kill the game if they were kicked and not bring back possible rape content. That's not how things work. There are plenty of games with rape just play those.

 

[Geigi]

huh, thats even worse then...just move to a subscription service that doesn't censor your creative work
i wasnt around at the very beginging, but they definitely responded "this isnt a woman abuse simulator" on their discord when i brought this up a couple months back.

It's not worse. There are enough shitty rape simulators already.

 

[Hidden Angel]

so the game is only text based?,is there a mod or something to make the pic or vid for particular scene

 

[JustForPorn12]

It's not worse. There are enough shitty rape simulators already.

idk, for me it ends suspension of disbelief when some asshole who claims he's going to "make me his bitch", as i stand naked in shower, just goes "oh, sure. no problem" to me politely asking them not to. it then also ruins any illusion of consequences/choice of whatever other options are provided.
they assholish enough to molest someone in the shower, but not so much as to...want to make them feel uncomfortable? it's just weird...

let alone the fact that *there are already content warnings/toggles* available in-game
if someone doesn't want to see non-con...they can just turn non-con off

but people who *do* want to see non-con, can't see actual non-con because they made the non-con "patreon complaint" or some such stupid shit
non-con isn't non-con if you have to consent to every single instance of it, and can back out any point

and this hand-holding seems to only apply to non-con,
i turn off watersports and butt-stuff and do not see it at all, like the guy who walks in on you peeing at the frat party
there's a "let him pee on you" option if you have watersports on, if you have it off, the only direction that goes is you can let him finish in your mouth or not if you let him jerk off.

there's no...
"oh hey, i'm going to pee on you"
- uh....plz don't
"okay, let me jerk off on you instead"
cause...you know...you've already told the game you don't want to see piss-play.

so if i have non-con set to "no warning", why am i constantly being warned about it?
and as i'v mentioned previously, this is made ever more annoying by the fact that like 50%+ of the games content is clearly some form of non-con.
if they didn't want it to be a "woman abuse simulator", and i'm not saying every scenario should go that way ( just that there are loads that clearly logically *should* but don't because the player neverever loses agency) why have so much content that clearly puts them in non-con situations?
if they want to "protect the player" or whatever, just...follow the fucking content warnings. people who don't want to see that stuff at all should be able to just turn the setting off and remove it from the game, everyone else should be able to play it without constantly being warned.

all that remains is that they're actively making the game worse just to appease patreon censors, in which case...fuck em, i'd rather just get em kicked off patreon and see if it improves the game.

 

[GokutheG]

idk, for me it ends suspension of disbelief when some asshole who claims he's going to "make me his bitch", as i stand naked in shower, just goes "oh, sure. no problem" to me politely asking them not to. it then also ruins any illusion of consequences/choice of whatever other options are provided.
they assholish enough to molest someone in the shower, but not so much as to...want to make them feel uncomfortable? it's just weird...

At the end of the day this is still a game. This is the dev giving the players who may like somewhat sketchy situations and players who avoid them an out. This game is about the players shaping the content for the most part that they want to see.

 

[JustForPorn12]

At the end of the day this is still a game. This is the dev giving the players who may like somewhat sketchy situations and players who avoid them an out. This game is about the players shaping the content for the most part that they want to see.

...but there are literally content filters already available in-game...
if someone doesn't want to see piss-play, they can turn it off entirely and never see it, even in situations where it should clearly show up
if someone doesn't want to see anal, they can turn it off entirely and never see it, even in situations where it should clearly show up
but for no reason whatsoever, non-con warning are nonstop even if you set bad situations to "no warning".
and the description of that option itself very clearly makes it sounds like there should be proper non-con in the game
(which there was at some point, apparently)
if someone is uncomfortable with non-con and doesn't want to see it in there college-dating sim, they can just turn it off and let everyone else can eat their cake
why make the experience worse for everyone else, other to presumably appease censors?
(which, again, even in this muted form would not actually be patreon-complaint. the only thing keeping them from getting kicked is obscurity)

 

[GokutheG]

...but there are literally content filters already available in-game...
if someone doesn't want to see piss-play, they can turn it off entirely and never see it, even in situations where it should clearly show up
if someone doesn't want to see anal, they can turn it off entirely and never see it, even in situations where it should clearly show up
but for no reason whatsoever, non-con warning are nonstop even if you set bad situations to "no warning".
and the description of that option itself very clearly makes it sounds like there should be proper non-con in the game
(which there was at some point, apparently)
if someone is uncomfortable with non-con and doesn't want to see it in there college-dating sim, they can just turn it off and let everyone else can eat their cake
why make the experience worse for everyone else, other to presumably appease censors?
(which, again, even in this muted form would not actually be patreon-complaint. the only thing keeping them from getting kicked is obscurity)

You can be into certain content but want to avoid it in certain context/with certain characters.

It's not just censors to give control over certain content to players and still give them an exit to content they don't want to see. I think you'll see most of this game's audience appreciate that amount of control over content.