Stop being condescending. I answered your point with an allegorical one. You alleged in terms of simplicity that different perspectives are only a good thing:
Using an allegory I showed that when you focus on an point of the colour i.e. the point of any ideological spectrum, you lose sight of the whole in minute arguments based upon a narrow focus on one colour (which I put forth is a negative thing which disputes your notion of 'ONLY A GOOD' thing). In laymans terms, when we look at the colour of the light shining in the prism, we could discern two colours much like male or female, then arguing over both 'colours' or ideas and forgetting we are both parts of the whole, i.e. human beings.
within the context of the actual discussion being had.
But it does relate, you are saying that different perspectives are only a good thing, i.e. you want to focus on the light split into different colours i.e. rich vs poor, man vs woman (i.e. this thread, which is why it IS RELEVANT), 3rd world vs 1st world, black vs white. You say that all these are good things, I argue they are not because when you focus on the 'colour' which is an allegory for any point of a spectrum such as the difference between male and female authors which is the topic of this thread we instantly cause DIVISION, which creates argument, which is not a good thing. The moment you even think that diverse perspectives = good you forget that to be diverse you must differentiate and separate human beings into labels and boxes, is that a good thing?
I'm 100% confident you're a super smart guy, Icarus. Unfortunately, you fall into that same category of genius who never realize how dumb they are always trying to interact using their "smartiepant speech" instead of assimilating to the level of whom they are conversing. In other words... speak American instead of PHD, will ya?
Oh!? Simplified rather than Traditional! My bad. Okay basically if we focus on things that divide us like gender or other shit like that we forget we're all human beings, that's the important thing, not the seperate things that divide us, that causes bad shit like arguments and fighting and all that, not a good thing.In other words... speak American instead of PHD, will ya?
Why not the other way around? Assimilate to my level dangnammit!
I know, right? I kept thinking that they're both saying making the same point like they both went up for a high-five but somehow managed to miss each other in the middle. Having different perspectives, the argument by lemonfreak, means better representation of all the colors and not having one color dominate, which gets us closer to that white light that Icarus Media (the non-comedian version) was arguing for because white light is a combination of all the colors. Let me hop on board that train too because i'm for more diversity both in the people making the games and the games being made.In the grand scheme... you are BOTH right. So go have a beer together, guys!
Smh, this is the internet. We're here to have endless arguments that could just be summarised as 'some thing about it are good, and other things are bad'. Get out of here with your optimistic nuance!
Stop writing like meMe go now, bash rocks with club.
