When people do this, they make light touchups to the AI-drawn piece; they don’t redraw the whole thing. So no, it’s not like using a reference at all.isn't that just using a reference with extra steps?
When people do this, they make light touchups to the AI-drawn piece; they don’t redraw the whole thing. So no, it’s not like using a reference at all.isn't that just using a reference with extra steps?
I don't mean to butt in but it feels like you forgot that hands are one of the hardest things to draw. That and humans make a butt load of mistakes.Ai based means that she let the Ai draw it and then redid it herself. Idk if it's true but the hand is still a mess. You can't argue with facts. Either she used ai or just fucked up, it's still fucked up.
Should be 2017-10Hello, can anyone tell me where is the Catwoman x Black Cat art? I didn't find it
true, but she never effed up. not even in her first artworks. That's a huge slip up that's entirely out of char. Whatever the reason, it means a significant drop in quality and effort.I don't mean to butt in but it feels like you forgot that hands are one of the hardest things to draw. That and humans make a butt load of mistakes.
Nah dandon was peak until 2019 / 2020 . After that i agree with . The proportions are not .... Right .Bubble becomes the straw that broke the camel's back because how it looked very similar to many AI artworks out there without Dandon addressing the issue whether she is assisted by it or not. She only addressed that the AI or not sites are unreliable -- maybe because she doesn't want get caught red-handed but hey what do I know? XD
I wouldn't be surprised if she took break for the rest of the year. Being artists these days not only sucked so bad, boundaries between hand-drawn piece and an AI slowly... getting blurry and not stopping at all.
I enjoyed her drawing since 2016/2017, and I think this year/decade is probably her lowest point yet.
Anyway, sorry for doomposting ^^
Don't trust A.I detectors btw. They aren't worth shit. I put my own artwork, most of which predates A.I software entirely, and all the leading detectors bar one, said my stuff was most likely A.I generated! One of my pics, that is 8 years old (a particularly shit one, that any idiot could see was painted by an amateur) they said was 99% definitely A.I, lmao!Um I honestly can't say is it AI generated or not. But I checked those identify AI with last pack and well but there's a catch we have step by step procces of process first pic, I didn't check video process but I have question if you do an AI generated art will you be putting an extra effort to do a step by step procces of creation if you just generated it by words?
So my answer is might be just trivial it might be some filter she used that gave it AI feel. For example I put Dandon's previous Bubble picture (which also gave me AI vibes btw but it is not) you see that there some filter plus some post work but it really makes art look different.
Edit: I also wanted to add that I saw a lot of AI art that looked liked Dandond Fuga's work, Cutesexyrobbuts Sakmichan and etc, because AI models just ripping it off, so that's confusion might be understandable.
View attachment 2801192 View attachment 2801193 View attachment 2801199 View attachment 2801200
When you see other artists pull this nonsense. It no surprising people came into the conclusion that it was AI. You don't need to do damage control to see how drastically change that art style is compare to what you normally see her put out.The AI art thing is so bullshit and literally just troll behavior.
This be a double-edged sword:Honestly, I wouldn't be surprised Dandon's unannounced hiatus is both due to what's eating her and the recent AI art accusations chipping away at her motivation.
Many artists were excellent and produced quality content that went down the drain instantly after an oopsie like this. Dandon, unfortunately, is one of them at the moment.I honestly don't know what to think.