- Jun 10, 2017
- 11,009
- 16,295
Others that the time needed to do the conversion, no.Is there a drawback to it?
Of course, there's an issue with the compression factor, that lower the quality of the image. But it's not different than with JPEG, with generally a smaller size for the same level of quality.
It's more the fact that it's a (relatively speaking) new format, and therefore that it doesn't come in mind as a solution, as easily as JPEG do, that make it less used. People have the habit since decades to rely on PNG and JPEG, and still need to take the habit to use WEBP in place of the second.
If you looks around you, the same apply outside of the adult gaming scene. By example, there's still few websites that switched to WEBP. I guess that it's partly due to the fact that its supports came late in Windows, while users tend to not regularly update their software, what mean that, for a long time, they were still using a browser that wasn't WEBP compliant.
All this just mean that, as I said, it's not an alternative that come to mind due to the context. People don't use WEBP because they aren't aware that it exist, or don't see it wildly used and so are uncertain about what it can worth.
But if you look at the adult gaming scene, since compression became a thing here, there's more and more games that come directly with WEBP files ; sometimes hidden behind a "jpg" extension since Ren'Py don't care about this part.