Elednum
Newbie
- Mar 5, 2024
- 15
- 8
- 123
Leslie is v0.10-ishThe Leslie scene for full penetration at 10 is fine but whens the sisters?
Dev's have not given any estimate for Ash.Leslie is v0.10-ish
Ashley is v0.09-ish ± .02
(the above is a guesstimate - I don't believe the devs have given an estimate --- but this is realistic)
I agree, at this rate I see Leslie having sex before ashley, If I had to guess I would say Cassie, Leslie and then Ashley last to fall.Dev's have not given any estimate for Ash.
I'd disagree given that Ash probably won't have much content in 7.5, that would only give 8.5 for more build up, and I think Ash is a bit less likely to fully give in and let Lillith get another score on the deal.
People seem to be making a huge assumption that Leslie will be the last of the family to fall so to speak
Notice my +/- symbol? So that's v0.07-ish to v0.11-ishDev's have not given any estimate for Ash.
I'd disagree given that Ash probably won't have much content in 7.5, that would only give 8.5 for more build up, and I think Ash is a bit less likely to fully give in and let Lillith get another score on the deal.
People seem to be making a huge assumption that Leslie will be the last of the family to fall so to speak
Every release has content with Leslie.Update with the mom?
Yeah, but Ash only gets content in x.5 updates. So There is that to bear in mind. Still disagree that we will see that any time soon. The only reason she even gave him a HJ/BJ in the first place is so he didn't die.Notice my +/- symbol? So that's v0.07-ish to v0.11-ish
I put in a large variance on purpose.
What Morado Said, it is also noted on the title page of this thread. It doesn't take much to do a little bit of reading. Out of all the possible questions, it should occur to someone that this is likely a frequently asked one.Update with the mom?
Certain? Hardly - again, first look at variance. Second, see the hedging of -ish. Just as has been used throughout this thread by devs and others -- -ish is a hedge to mean could be in the vicinity of. Not binding. Not exactly. Not certain. Not by image, not by perception, not by actualization.You also put yourself across as very certain (this is realistic) it's not,
Hardly - there is nothing that leads to your hypothetical assumption with Sifa, nothing at all --- where as we do have some trends with Ashley, as well as past trends with other family members.But this is just a pure guess no more realistic than me saying say that Sifa will get the 0.9 vote.
So the only reason I partially quoted you wasn't to take it out of context, but the fact it was like 2 replies up and you wrote it.Certain? Hardly - again, first look at variance. Second, see the hedging of -ish. Just as has been used throughout this thread by devs and others -- -ish is a hedge to mean could be in the vicinity of. Not binding. Not exactly. Not certain. Not by image, not by perception, not by actualization.
Second, see the first part of the entire parenthetical you quoted out of context (colored for ease of recognition):
(the above is a guesstimate - I don't believe the devs have given an estimate --- but this is realistic)
The "but this is realistic" means using common sense - not some half-wit, cock-in-hand coping nor some rigid algorithm.
Hardly - there is nothing that leads to your hypothetical assumption with Sifa, nothing at all --- where as we do have some trends with Ashley, as well as past trends with other family members.
I think you're splitting hairs for some odd reason - when it's obviously a well-reasoned guess - yet, still a guess -- and if you want to continue to do so, might be best to move this to off-topic.
I can tell you need sleep. Moving this to Off-topic because you did not, instead deciding to go one more time here - and because I think you took my first post way too seriously and front-loaded than it was and you're quibbling over next to nothing.It might be well reasoned, but I still disagree with you. Even with the hedge, I'd place Ashley after Leslie. Also with the current update schedule I can guarantee that Ash will not have full sex in 0.9.0 (if you want to get precise).
I also have a well reasoned throughline for my disagreement. I mentioned it above. She knows about the deal, she only did anything with MC to get actually save his life, and to move from there to full sex in 2-3 updates where she only gets a part of the content I think it too fast.
Anyway, I need sleep. I'll read any replies tomorrow
Just a guess that he could have a dream sequence of the MC finally banging Leslie, only to wake up that it was a dream!I agree, at this rate I see Leslie having sex before ashley, If I had to guess I would say Cassie, Leslie and then Ashley last to fall.
If Breadman keeps coming with leslie updates on every release, he will have to come up with something else if not sex.. there still are 5 more updates until v 0.10 and she gets content on every one.. and we already have brutal deepthroats.. so that leaves me thinking.. if not sex then what?
Bread stated no long ago that now he added magic into the story he has more tools to play with the script.. we will see what he has in mind, soon..
What even is this commentIf only we were immortal, I wish. A decade is like half your life has gone through something that can never be re-entered again.