Completely agree. It was quite enjoyable early on, but as the game developed the writing plummeted. Its painful actually to play the game since you have to actually spend time thinking about what the narrative actually means. It's a pity its not a renpy game...I would have fixed the dialogue myself.
Sorry, no. I stopped playing it (and deleted my saves) a while ago when the writing started to really deteriorate and the dev refused to acknowledge or try to fix it. Hopefully there is an end at some point and I'll sit down with an HTML editor.
eh i wish there were almost NO writing in sandboxes as i dont read anyway
) 
That’s an interesting take. My engagement with a game comes almost entirely from the narrative, so I never thought of it this way.eh i wish there were almost NO writing in sandboxes as i dont read anyway(who does? why would u do that?!
ideally i want more p&c, environment interactions on top of time-location tracking n some rng.
kinda have no RP sbx to play rn ;[ (even think to replay this game as iam 17versions behind) and yeah, patially i blame devs who waste time on writing . narrative should emerge out of quests not other way around.
generally if quest chain is solid/lengthy - objects&npcs, locations, visuals, dialogue options/responses and tips will be sufficient enough (im not against external w/t as well in case ingame says what to do without why. if some reasoning and explaining is indeed needed)
