Recommending Femdom Finder 2.0

5.00 star(s) 4 Votes

Do you love femdom?

  • Certainly

    Votes: 4,543 43.7%
  • Of course

    Votes: 1,667 16.1%
  • Indubitably

    Votes: 1,529 14.7%
  • Definitely

    Votes: 2,646 25.5%

  • Total voters
    10,385

Mister_M

Engaged Member
Apr 2, 2018
2,574
5,284
@Mister_M I really don't mind some mandatory maledom, as long as the femdom content is worth (take Bound by Lust as an example, there's that BJ bs scene in the beginning, there's a lot of maledom routes and scenes, but femdom content is worth so far).

Even if the game is somewhat generalist and femdom content belongs only to a particular route, it is fine imo, as long as it is good and we don't have to constantly face not-femdom content in that particular route. And I think that's how the thread currently works.

--------------

As for cuckolding, forced-bi and other fetishes, I actually completely agree that it is not femdom at all in most of the cases. Most of the cases are just male submission instead of female domination. That's easily perceived if you just remove that "beta-faggot-bitch-boy" from the scene: it will become nothing but an ordinary vanilla or maledom content about 95% of the "cuckolding femdom video" and shit like that.

It is actually laughable how most of these scenes comes with anti-femdom messages and slurs. It's something weird to understand - let's watch a femdom video that virtually says that femdom is bad. Below we have some examples of sentences that I'm pretty sure most of the users in this thread have seen while searching for a good femdom content.

- "You're just a faggot, I like real alpha men!" (then why are you present in a video/game/whatever labeled as "femdom"? To show us how much you like to submit to men?)
- "Only real men can satisfy me!" (I see, so could you please stop wasting my time and give your place to a real woman who enjoys to be properly served?)
- "No woman likes a beta cucky like you" (oh dear, you're speaking for yourself, not for every woman in the world. And if it bothers you, take a slutty dress and go out on the city with a huge sign with words "I'M A SUBMISSIVE BITCH AND I NEED AN ALPHA MALE TO RUIN ME IN THE BED" written on it and stop flooding my search results with bs that are not femdom at all)
- "Beta guys like you cannot satisfy me" (agreed, and I'd also say that we are not seeking to serve a submissive girl like you. So, again, please give your place for an actual queen who enjoy to be served as we are not interested in "daddy's personal bitch girls" who loves to be slapped by an alpha man)

I usually blame Masoch for these people who typically advocates common cuckolding scenes as a "true femdom" content. I mean, when you ask someone about a famous femdom story, "Venus in Furs" is among the most widely known.

However, while Venus in Furs does have femdom content in the story, the big picture is purely maledom. The book's moral basically says that a relationship is always based in D/s, and it won't work well if Dom = woman and Sub = man. That's the whole meaning behind that last cuckolding scene, which leads MC to flee and permanently leave his mistress.

That said, there are cases where cuckolding and related stuff can be femdom, but honestly, it's not cuckolding itself that makes it femdom. Take a reverse case as example: the sub cheating on someone. For example, an story where the sub cheats on his vanilla wife for a domina. Or even cheating on a domina for another domina.

All of these cases are examples of femdom plots, but it "being femdom" is not really determined by the cheating/cuck/NTR stuff. And since cuckolding is not the decisive point about a story being femdom or not, I think this is the reason why most people in this thread agree that no game is femdom just because it has some cuckolding inside it.

--------------

As for Hardcore Femdom game... honestly, I downloaded it and played, but:

- It is just a demo and F95zone didn't upload the full version. So, the content you'll find is simply too poor for someone say "heeeey, this game should be in that list".
- Femdom content is mostly cliche insulting and trampling/bootlicking stuff.
- It also features maledom content, with the dominating girl being clearly inferior to her "alpha man" (alpha male > girl > doormat boi). He also engages in trampling and shoelicking receiver (alongside the overused "fag boi" and similar insults).

When I say that "it is just a demo and the content is too poor", you guys can try it for yourselves. I set to "Skip Unseen text" in Preferences and hold my Ctrl key in the beginning, after initial choices (with Mistress Yuki saying: "I love you daddy"), while using my phone's stopwatch to time it. It reached the demo's end in about 11 seconds. Maybe we could find more femdom stuff in the full game, but I cannot say it based on what I saw.

For now, in my opinion... unless you guys are interested in making some changes in this thread, creating some sort of categories like those you can find in that "Futa on male thread" - where you can find a category with games that are really poor in futa on male content (but nonetheless there's at least one scene with futa on male - so, well, they include the game in that list)... I don't see any strong reason to put this game in this thread's list.

Also, if the full game is released, maybe it could be properly evaluated, but that's another discussion.

And for my opinion about such a category system, I honestly don't think the effort to put "games poor in femdom but with a femdom scene" in our list is worth. So basically... yeah, keep as it is, the list is great as it is now and that's it.

Text is already long, I think it is enough xd
That's a great post. I completely agree with you. My comment as to why I can see some forced bi as femdom refers to the fact that if a Mistress forces a heterosexual sub to some activity with another man who is not placed in D/s hierarchy above the woman (could be another sub), and she does so for her amusement or to assess her dominance over him/them or just to punish him/them it imho could be perceived as smth that may belong under the femdom umbrella. Personally I (and I believe most heterosexual players) find this not arousing at all (on the contrary tbh), but if that other man is treated as a tool (like a dildo let's say) to humiliate/punish another man/slave it could be treated as some kind of femdom activity.

And yes, J1215's work here is greatly appreciated, he really keeps the thread alive and kicking. Thank you for your work!
 

manlock

Newbie
Aug 13, 2018
83
132
I have had Mina's game on my list to try for a while because I don't mind a bit of maledom as long as the femdom is most prevalent.

But the attitude displayed in this thread by Mina has put me off ever trying that game. What an awful representation of themselves and their game.

I also don't accept the language barrier as the sole cause.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hamsterus

StraponBoy88

New Member
Feb 5, 2019
5
7
Why bring a personal taste to the discussion when there is an objective criteria - the quality of writing. "Nothing is forever" is by far the best game here thanks to writing.
And that’s your personal taste. It’s ok to like somethings different.Maybe it has better writing but Femdom-wise it’s not even close.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Laehtsia

hamsterus

Member
Aug 18, 2018
101
185
Quality of writing is not an objective criteria. While during the last poll we had a few games that had a majority of votes, I don't think there's objectively a 'best femdom game' out there. I for one never could get into NIF. I enjoyed Second Class but I wouldn't put it in a top 10 favourite personal list. Everything's about personal taste and we should see our differences as a positive thing. The passion you have for a certain criteria might persuade others to give things a second try while on the lookout for something they could have missed the first time around. Enchiladas!
 

Fred52

Newbie
Sep 7, 2022
47
18
Quality of writing is not an objective criteria. While during the last poll we had a few games that had a majority of votes, I don't think there's objectively a 'best femdom game' out there. I for one never could get into NIF. I enjoyed Second Class but I wouldn't put it in a top 10 favourite personal list. Everything's about personal taste and we should see our differences as a positive thing. The passion you have for a certain criteria might persuade others to give things a second try while on the lookout for something they could have missed the first time around. Enchiladas!
I would like to hear what your top 10 games are as second class is not on your list. I think its not on my list either tbh
 

manlock

Newbie
Aug 13, 2018
83
132
I wasn't a fan of Second Class personally but I can see why some people would like it.

Of course, we will all have our own preferences. And that's okay.
 

Hint17

Newbie
May 11, 2022
25
36
Quality of writing is not an objective criteria. While during the last poll we had a few games that had a majority of votes, I don't think there's objectively a 'best femdom game' out there. I for one never could get into NIF. I enjoyed Second Class but I wouldn't put it in a top 10 favourite personal list. Everything's about personal taste and we should see our differences as a positive thing. The passion you have for a certain criteria might persuade others to give things a second try while on the lookout for something they could have missed the first time around. Enchiladas!
What you're talking about is again a personal taste. Some people like sci-fi, some like historical novels. That is not what I am talking about.

The quality of a written text can be evaluated and compared with other texts, the same way, for example, you can tell that one person is taller than the other. In this context the height of a person is not a matter of a personal taste. It is an objective criteria. You can't do anything with it. Some people are just taller than others. The same way, some writers are just more educated and more talented than others. And their text are simply better written.

And just to avoid another misunderstanding:
The science of writing is not as widespread and readily available to everyone as say the science of mathematics. While the mathematics pretty much everyone learn in school, nobody learn the subject of "writing books / movie scripts / game plots, etc". It simply does not exist at that educational level.

But it requires the same amount of hard work and time spent to study it. Despite that fact, for some reason many people believe they are good at writing texts or evaluating the quality of texts, just because they can read and write. That is not the case. For example, you can drive a car, but it does not mean you can be a car manufacturer. You need to have a scientific knowledge in many engineering disciplines and manufacturing experience to actually become one. The same way you can't write actual books or evaluate their quality just because you can read and write. You need to learn a lot to became an actual writer or an actual pro critic.
 
Last edited:

Innocience

Member
Mar 25, 2020
429
724
Could you elaborate so that we may partake in your wisdom? I'm particularly interested in the following:
The quality of a written text can be evaluated and compared with other texts, the same way, for example, you can tell that one person is taller than the other.
What do you want to quantify(!) in texts to make them comparable and which metric will you use?
Cause I fail to find what exactly it is you deem analogous to measure and compare in a text that is as measurable, objective and descriptive as the measurement of distance?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orlov and hamsterus

Hint17

Newbie
May 11, 2022
25
36
Could you elaborate so that we may partake in your wisdom? I'm particularly interested in the following:

What do you want to quantify(!) in texts to make them comparable and which metric will you use?
Cause I fail to find what exactly it is you deem analogous to measure and compare in a text that is as measurable, objective and descriptive as the measurement of distance?
It is qualitative approach, not quantitative. You don't need a ruler to say that one person is head and shoulders taller than other. You can see it. And you can do it because some time ago in your childhood you spent some time to learn how to use your eyes as a measurement tool.

The same way you would need to spend some time learning about - character development, story development, art of writing dialogs, the difference between character-driven stories and plot-driven stories, etc, so you can use your eyes to see the difference between a well-written text with properly developed characters and a poorly-written text with underdeveloped characters.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 912BHi

manlock

Newbie
Aug 13, 2018
83
132
While the quality of writing is subject to some objectivity it is also su ject to personal taste. One writer might have an almost poetic and flowery form of writing which is both verbose and descriptive while another might have a more abrupt style of writing that gets to the point far quicker but emits detail. The two are imcomparoble. And there for taste plays its part as to whether writing is enjoyed.

Lay on that the theme and the nature / lore of the story and it becomes very hard to discern writing quality. One person's quality is another person's rubbish.

Of course you can ascertain the quality of writing to a degree the margin it falls under will be very large and there will still be subjective dispute .
 
  • Like
Reactions: mamdmamd

Mister_M

Engaged Member
Apr 2, 2018
2,574
5,284
We were taught at the university (I studied Polish language, but had mandatory courses and exams of applied poetics, world literature, functional grammar and more) that there are objective methods of evaluation literature, which are not based on one's personal preference. (To use the height example of Hint17: one can measure if someone is taller or shorter, and one can prefer taller or shorter people; liking taller or shorter people is however irrelevant to the objective fact of someone's height.) Now, it's been approx. 13 yrs since I've finished uni, but from what I remember you check things like language used (rhetorical means, use of language), internal logic, how repetitive it is (compared to other literary works), context, etc. In other words, to use a quote: "evaluation is both an objective matter of what the book presents and a subjective matter of what the book does to the reader"; I may enjoy reading Guy N. Smith's Night of the Crabs and maybe even like it more than The Lord of the Rings, but I wouldn't say it's better than TLotR.
 

Innocience

Member
Mar 25, 2020
429
724
It is qualitative approach, not quantitative.
I see. Distance is firmly in the measurement, mathematics and physics side of my brain. Hence the confusion.
that there are objective methods
Ah, now I get it.

There'd still remain the issue of distilling all the objective aspects into a single comparable measure: "quality of writing".
In other words the argument
Why bring a personal taste to the discussion when there is an objective criteria - the quality of writing.
seems presumptous. How you weigh those objective aspects to factor into the single "quality of writing" metric is still subjective.

That sure is a long way to say: I don't see NiF as the objectively best written Femdom game on this list.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mister_M

Evizzy89

Well-Known Member
Aug 1, 2021
1,246
2,042
You need to learn a lot to became an actual writer or an actual pro critic.
so what makes an actual writer or a pro critic?

don't forget this is an era with the internet available and where a fuck-ton of "education" you learn in school these days simply do not apply to the majority of real-life situations or is simply twisted to misinform people
 
5.00 star(s) 4 Votes