Well, probably any case of "IRL" futanaris in this thread would be edited images or AI generated stuff. I don't hate it, but most cases are somewhat weird.
If real "futas" exists (eg: a person who features at least breasts, vagina, phallus with uretra and capacity to ejaculate), they are insanely rare. I've never heard of any pornstar with these features, and most "females with cocks" we see out there are shemales or MtF transgenders, which are not futanaris by concept (as they lack a vagina and futas are hermaphrodites by definition; indeed, if we're taking the presence of an uterus, testicles, ovaries and female+male fertility at the same time with self-fertilization possibility, well... good luck to find a single case of real futanari human in the whole humanity, even taking the last 100,000 years into account).
But I guess that, if "IRL" stuff was common on this thread, people would post shemale porn here anyway (despite it not being actually futa porn), so I agree that avoiding it (or at least keeping it at minimun) is a good idea.
If real "futas" exists (eg: a person who features at least breasts, vagina, phallus with uretra and capacity to ejaculate), they are insanely rare. I've never heard of any pornstar with these features, and most "females with cocks" we see out there are shemales or MtF transgenders, which are not futanaris by concept (as they lack a vagina and futas are hermaphrodites by definition; indeed, if we're taking the presence of an uterus, testicles, ovaries and female+male fertility at the same time with self-fertilization possibility, well... good luck to find a single case of real futanari human in the whole humanity, even taking the last 100,000 years into account).
But I guess that, if "IRL" stuff was common on this thread, people would post shemale porn here anyway (despite it not being actually futa porn), so I agree that avoiding it (or at least keeping it at minimun) is a good idea.
Last edited: