Recommending FUTA ON MALE content collection(list)

5.00 star(s) 18 Votes

The Shape

Formerly 'the shape'
Sep 23, 2017
10
12
86
The irony is twofold: not only has he contributed to the cesspool of "childlike drama" that he initially despised, it also looks like he found his keyboard yesterday.

Look my dude, no one here is in a moral authority. You're on a piracy forum for porn. So, let's just simmer down, let the kids throw sand in the sandbox, laugh at their idiocy from the confines of the our chairs, and move on when the content shows up. You trying to shout down those who are here doing dumb shit is only going to rile them up.

Last week, it's AI arguments. This week, man with two-dollar words tries to show a modicum of intelligence while arguing with the rabble, thereby exposing his true stupidity. I hesitate to change the channel.
“The irony is twofold: not only has he contributed to the cesspool of "childlike drama" that he initially despised, it also looks like he found his keyboard yesterday.”

I’m not sure you and I’s definition of drama align. Was Dr. King a main contributor to the problem or was it the lynchers he chose to shine a light upon? Was Muhammad Ali a main contributor to the problem, or the elected officials that engaged in pointless combat that he chose to shine a light upon? Was Malcolm X a main contributor to the problem or was it the bigots that bombed countless innocent churches that he chose to shine a light upon? Was Patrice Lumumba a main contributor to the problem or those that enacted colonization and mass stripped a continent of resources that he chose to shine a light upon? Was Thomas Sankara a main contributor to the problem or was it the deceitful colonial powers he chose to shine a light upon? Again sir, that line of reasoning doesn’t fit me. And I’m not sure how the extent of participation in a forum dismisses anything at all. Enlighten me.

“Look my dude, no one here is in a moral authority. You're on a piracy forum for porn. So, let's just simmer down, let the kids throw sand in the sandbox, laugh at their idiocy from the confines of the our chairs, and move on when the content shows up. You trying to shout down those who are here doing dumb shit is only going to rile them up.”

I’ve never once stated I am moral authority. I’ve never once even implied the case. You are misrepresenting my viewpoint. I appreciate your concern and your advice, sir. However, I’ll do as I wish and you will do the same. You have your reasons and I have mine. You choose to laugh at subconscious idiocy (as you put it) and brush it aside, I choose to challenge it. So be it. It’s lost on me truly how providing a position, articulating why I believe something, and having sound logical reasoning backing it is being framed as “shouting down” on someone. No sir. I have a differing opinion and I’m uncompromising in the stance and won’t sugarcoat and sweet talk you to appease how you or others feel towards what I am stating. That is all. I am putting things quite candidly and the emotional aspect is insignificant to me.

“This week, man with two-dollar words tries to show a modicum of intelligence while arguing with the rabble, thereby exposing his true stupidity.”

In your words, sir, how would an individual challenging the idiocy of the rabble (your framing) equate to that individual displaying true stupidity instead of the rabble itself? Again, an ad hominem and indirect attack on being one that values intelligence. An echo chamber does not intimidate me, numbers do not intimidate me, the “rabble’s” numbers are trivial to me. Those who let a fear of a group silence them, cause inaction, or let others shun them out of their voicing of opinion are not people I choose to take characteristics from, sir. Those are not characteristics of a leader. Those are characteristics of a follower. They go along to get along. Let me make this clear again, I have no problem whatsoever going against the grain if my analysis of a situation has led me there. What’s next? Am I pretentious, egotistical, full of myself, conceited, smug, pompous, or perhaps arrogant because I dare challenge a group’s idiocy (as you put it)? The labels fall on deaf ears, sir; individuals name call and attempt to attack one’s character when their stance cannot stand on its own legs. This is a trick deployed in the most ancient of civilizations. This isn’t anything new, nor is your shrewd attempts at trying to get someone to silence themselves.
 

SynthScribe

Member
Jan 13, 2019
266
496
147
Choose your own eternity(Parodies ai ) has been released! Any hero?
Been waiting for the latest update to this one for awhile =/

At some point I think there was a page on f95 for `Choose Your Own Eternity`, but I remember there was some technical reason it wouldn't load for me. Curious if that's related to why it may not have appeared here yet.


You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Trapitalism101

The Shape

Formerly 'the shape'
Sep 23, 2017
10
12
86
You complain that the thread is off topic and then take it much further off topic. Your complaint basically comes down to "I want to be served free porn on a silver platter without having to scroll past some unrelated comments". When you get dragged for your incredible conceit, you think an allegory for your incredibly short attention span somehow makes you right.

Don't mistake my decision not to engage with your argument as an inability to do so. I'm simply content with pointing out that you're a hypocrite and a joke. At lease your pretentious bumbling has been entertaining while waiting for new content.
“You complain that the thread is off topic and then take it much further off topic.”

analogy

anal·o·gy
“a comparison of two otherwise unlike things based on resemblance of a particular aspect.”

This is directly from the horse’s mouth, sir. A colloquial drought here was being compared to a colloquial drought in another setting. The “shining a light upon an issue makes said person the issue” fallacy was compared directly to historical figures known for being upstanding that had this cunning strategy sicced upon them. And both of these subjects were initiated by you because I dared to ask the thread to return back to form or let it rest until more content was accessible. You can continue to debate a clear-cut, solid fact, sir. You look foolish in doing so.

“Your complaint basically comes down to "I want to be served free porn on a silver platter without having to scroll past some unrelated comments".

Now this is an actual critique that has some actual ground, sir. Nice. Yet I’d even have to contend with that and say you’re still going about it disingenuously. It downplays and frames the issue as a vague “some” when there are multitudes amount of unrelated comments that fills pages and pages worth of waste. Why do you think I remained silent until now? You’re telling half truths to strengthen your point.

“When you get dragged for your incredible conceit, you think an allegory for your incredibly short attention span somehow makes you right.”

Being “dragged” for an opinion does not bother me in the real world sir, let alone the internet. You all are faceless strangers at the end of the day. I’m an open-minded man I’d like to believe, but I do not give leeway nor capitulate to an individual’s beliefs if it has no basis in reality and I won’t go along with it just to make you comfortable. It is what it is. You may need more discomfort so you have more opportunities to grow. And no sir, I provided two analogies, not an allegory, to provide the logical explanation of my position and to challenge yours. That is how you articulate your thoughts, sir. That is normal.

“Don't mistake my decision not to engage with your argument as an inability to do so. I'm simply content with pointing out that you're a hypocrite and a joke. At lease your pretentious bumbling has been entertaining while waiting for new content.”

I believe you, sir, I believe you haha. You’ve been doing a swell job so far. Do you have any other names that you would like to throw out there? Moron, maybe? Simpleton if you’re feeling classical?
 
Last edited:

TheHoleyDiver

New Member
May 15, 2021
9
49
137
“The irony is twofold: not only has he contributed to the cesspool of "childlike drama" that he initially despised, it also looks like he found his keyboard yesterday.”

I’m not sure you and I’s definition of drama align. Was Dr. King a main contributor to the problem or was it the lynchers he chose to shine a light upon? Was Muhammad Ali a main contributor to the problem, or the elected officials that engaged in pointless combat that he chose to shine a light upon? Was Malcolm X a main contributor to the problem or was it the bigots that bombed countless innocent churches that he chose to shine a light upon? Was Patrice Lumumba a main contributor to the problem or those that enacted colonization and mass stripped a continent of resources that he chose to shine a light upon? Was Thomas Sankara a main contributor to the problem or was it the deceitful colonial powers he chose to shine a light upon? Again sir, that line of reasoning doesn’t fit me. And I’m not sure how the extent of participation in a forum dismisses anything at all. Enlighten me.

“Look my dude, no one here is in a moral authority. You're on a piracy forum for porn. So, let's just simmer down, let the kids throw sand in the sandbox, laugh at their idiocy from the confines of the our chairs, and move on when the content shows up. You trying to shout down those who are here doing dumb shit is only going to rile them up.”

I’ve never once stated I am moral authority. I’ve never once even implied the case. You are misrepresenting my viewpoint. I appreciate your concern and your advice, sir. However, I’ll do as I wish and you will do the same. You have your reasons and I have mine. You choose to laugh at subconscious idiocy (as you put it) and brush it aside, I choose to challenge it. So be it. It’s lost on me truly how providing a position, articulating why I believe something, and having sound logical reasoning backing it is being framed as “shouting down” on someone. No sir. I have a differing opinion and I’m uncompromising in the stance and won’t sugarcoat and sweet talk you to appease how you or others feel towards what I am stating. That is all. I am putting things quite candidly and the emotional aspect is insignificant to me.

“This week, man with two-dollar words tries to show a modicum of intelligence while arguing with the rabble, thereby exposing his true stupidity.”

In your words, sir, how would an individual challenging the idiocy of the rabble (your framing) equate to that individual displaying true stupidity instead of the rabble itself? Again, an ad hominem and indirect attack on being one that values intelligence. An echo chamber does not intimidate me, numbers do not intimidate me, the “rabble’s” numbers are trivial to me. Those who let a fear of a group silence them, cause inaction, or let others shun them out of their voicing of opinion are not people I choose to take characteristics from, sir. Those are not characteristics of a leader. Those are characteristics of a follower. They go along to get along. Let me make this clear again, I have no problem whatsoever going against the grain if my analysis of a situation has led me there. What’s next? Am I pretentious, egotistical, full of myself, conceited, smug, pompous, or perhaps arrogant because I dare challenge a group’s idiocy (as you put it)? The labels fall on deaf ears, sir; individuals name call and attempt to attack one’s character when their stance cannot stand on its own legs. This is a trick deployed in the most ancient of civilizations. This isn’t anything new, nor is your shrewd attempts at trying to get someone to silence themselves.
This will be my last post toward you, because this is hilarious in a channel like this, but I don't have the time, nor will I provide it any more brain power.

Comparing the situation of a person (you) bringing to light and challenging a porn site thread bickering about things other than the thread's topic is NOT akin to the works of Dr. King, Muhammad Ali, Malcom X, and others. That is an analogy fallacy. You're ignoring the gravity of this channel, which is not on-par with who you are comparing yourself to. The struggles of Dr. King, Muhammad Ali, Malcom X, and others are not equivalent, and you do a disservice to those people you did compare yourself to because of the context of this forum. Nothing you do here will change society at-large. When they look upon the annals of internet history, you will be less than a blip, as will I.

"It’s lost on me truly how providing a position, articulating why I believe something, and having sound logical reasoning backing it is being framed as “shouting down” on someone."

Because when in a forum that isn't about the "rules of the channel" is used to make a stance, moral or otherwise, it's more akin to shouting at people at a convention: everyone looks at you funny for a moment, some might agree, but after a while, everyone is going to move on and do what they came here to do. And that is, to enjoy the convention (the FTM thread that Choo-choo has been kind enough to curate.). It's similar with the other people you are ironically challenging, as I said before. Funny enough, that's what I'm doing too, and I can see the irony in that as well. Maybe you'd have better luck with a Moderator than you would trying to get your point across in a thread that has nothing to do with the rules. If you didn't understand where that was? General Rules Are Here

"Am I pretentious, egotistical, full of myself, conceited, smug, pompous, or perhaps arrogant because I dare challenge a group’s idiocy (as you put it)? The labels fall on deaf ears, sir; individuals name call and attempt to attack one’s character when their stance cannot stand on its own legs. This is a trick deployed in the most ancient of civilizations. This isn’t anything new, nor is your shrewd attempts at trying to get someone to silence themselves."

No, you are all of those things because:
1. Egotistical--you compared yourself to great orators and those who championed justice, and you think justice is to be found in a porn server (I guarantee you, no justice is here, and you reveal your egotism by your own words).
2. Smug--You have excessive pride for standing up for what you believe in, which is insignificant in the grand scheme of the forum, the internet at large, and the planet. You want to have pride in something? Go do some volunteer work. Go help someone out on the street. Donate to a local mission, or feed the homeless. These are places where real people are needed to champion common humanity.
3. Pompus/Arrogant--Your tone, the way you represent yourself, is disingenuous, lofty, and lacks a general "down to earth" quality that people speak with. This is not a debate room; you're not on a soapbox or behind a lectern. There are real people behind these screens.

Lastly, I don't need you to silence yourself. I can do it myself with the simple "ignore" button. The people telling you these things? We're doing it as a favor to you. We're trying to help you realize how little good will you will garner within this forum by acting this way.

But proceed if you must. I've already hit the ignore button.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Icy Frost

RohanK400

Newbie
Nov 3, 2019
28
62
112
This will be my last post toward you, because this is hilarious in a channel like this, but I don't have the time, nor will I provide it any more brain power.

Comparing the situation of a person (you) bringing to light and challenging a porn site thread bickering about things other than the thread's topic is NOT akin to the works of Dr. King, Muhammad Ali, Malcom X, and others. That is an analogy fallacy. You're ignoring the gravity of this channel, which is not on-par with who you are comparing yourself to. The struggles of Dr. King, Muhammad Ali, Malcom X, and others are not equivalent, and you do a disservice to those people you did compare yourself to because of the context of this forum. Nothing you do here will change society at-large. When they look upon the annals of internet history, you will be less than a blip, as will I.

"It’s lost on me truly how providing a position, articulating why I believe something, and having sound logical reasoning backing it is being framed as “shouting down” on someone."

Because when in a forum that isn't about the "rules of the channel" is used to make a stance, moral or otherwise, it's more akin to shouting at people at a convention: everyone looks at you funny for a moment, some might agree, but after a while, everyone is going to move on and do what they came here to do. And that is, to enjoy the convention (the FTM thread that Choo-choo has been kind enough to curate.). It's similar with the other people you are ironically challenging, as I said before. Funny enough, that's what I'm doing too, and I can see the irony in that as well. Maybe you'd have better luck with a Moderator than you would trying to get your point across in a thread that has nothing to do with the rules. If you didn't understand where that was? General Rules Are Here

"Am I pretentious, egotistical, full of myself, conceited, smug, pompous, or perhaps arrogant because I dare challenge a group’s idiocy (as you put it)? The labels fall on deaf ears, sir; individuals name call and attempt to attack one’s character when their stance cannot stand on its own legs. This is a trick deployed in the most ancient of civilizations. This isn’t anything new, nor is your shrewd attempts at trying to get someone to silence themselves."

No, you are all of those things because:
1. Egotistical--you compared yourself to great orators and those who championed justice, and you think justice is to be found in a porn server (I guarantee you, no justice is here, and you reveal your egotism by your own words).
2. Smug--You have excessive pride for standing up for what you believe in, which is insignificant in the grand scheme of the forum, the internet at large, and the planet. You want to have pride in something? Go do some volunteer work. Go help someone out on the street. Donate to a local mission, or feed the homeless. These are places where real people are needed to champion common humanity.
3. Pompus/Arrogant--Your tone, the way you represent yourself, is disingenuous, lofty, and lacks a general "down to earth" quality that people speak with. This is not a debate room; you're not on a soapbox or behind a lectern. There are real people behind these screens.

Lastly, I don't need you to silence yourself. I can do it myself with the simple "ignore" button. The people telling you these things? We're doing it as a favor to you. We're trying to help you realize how little good will you will garner within this forum by acting this way.

But proceed if you must. I've already hit the ignore button.
Yall ain't talking about shit! Where the futas at?
 

Icy Frost

Member
Apr 12, 2021
297
495
129
“The irony is twofold: not only has he contributed to the cesspool of "childlike drama" that he initially despised, it also looks like he found his keyboard yesterday.”

I’m not sure you and I’s definition of drama align. Was Dr. King a main contributor to the problem or was it the lynchers he chose to shine a light upon? Was Muhammad Ali a main contributor to the problem, or the elected officials that engaged in pointless combat that he chose to shine a light upon? Was Malcolm X a main contributor to the problem or was it the bigots that bombed countless innocent churches that he chose to shine a light upon? Was Patrice Lumumba a main contributor to the problem or those that enacted colonization and mass stripped a continent of resources that he chose to shine a light upon? Was Thomas Sankara a main contributor to the problem or was it the deceitful colonial powers he chose to shine a light upon? Again sir, that line of reasoning doesn’t fit me. And I’m not sure how the extent of participation in a forum dismisses anything at all. Enlighten me.

“Look my dude, no one here is in a moral authority. You're on a piracy forum for porn. So, let's just simmer down, let the kids throw sand in the sandbox, laugh at their idiocy from the confines of the our chairs, and move on when the content shows up. You trying to shout down those who are here doing dumb shit is only going to rile them up.”

I’ve never once stated I am moral authority. I’ve never once even implied the case. You are misrepresenting my viewpoint. I appreciate your concern and your advice, sir. However, I’ll do as I wish and you will do the same. You have your reasons and I have mine. You choose to laugh at subconscious idiocy (as you put it) and brush it aside, I choose to challenge it. So be it. It’s lost on me truly how providing a position, articulating why I believe something, and having sound logical reasoning backing it is being framed as “shouting down” on someone. No sir. I have a differing opinion and I’m uncompromising in the stance and won’t sugarcoat and sweet talk you to appease how you or others feel towards what I am stating. That is all. I am putting things quite candidly and the emotional aspect is insignificant to me.

“This week, man with two-dollar words tries to show a modicum of intelligence while arguing with the rabble, thereby exposing his true stupidity.”

In your words, sir, how would an individual challenging the idiocy of the rabble (your framing) equate to that individual displaying true stupidity instead of the rabble itself? Again, an ad hominem and indirect attack on being one that values intelligence. An echo chamber does not intimidate me, numbers do not intimidate me, the “rabble’s” numbers are trivial to me. Those who let a fear of a group silence them, cause inaction, or let others shun them out of their voicing of opinion are not people I choose to take characteristics from, sir. Those are not characteristics of a leader. Those are characteristics of a follower. They go along to get along. Let me make this clear again, I have no problem whatsoever going against the grain if my analysis of a situation has led me there. What’s next? Am I pretentious, egotistical, full of myself, conceited, smug, pompous, or perhaps arrogant because I dare challenge a group’s idiocy (as you put it)? The labels fall on deaf ears, sir; individuals name call and attempt to attack one’s character when their stance cannot stand on its own legs. This is a trick deployed in the most ancient of civilizations. This isn’t anything new, nor is your shrewd attempts at trying to get someone to silence themselves.
bruh, just shut the fuck up man, you complain about people having off topic discussions here that are both short and short lived, while your post fucking walls of text, I wasted my time reading your nothing burger, shut the fuck up. bruh
This thread has become a community of sorts, always the same faces, people are just having a chat while there's not much content to share, it's not a content thread for a specific creator.
so, please kindly show yourself out, or shut the hell up and stop larping as an intelectual when we all know you're clearly not.
I too can try using fancier words, turn a simple sentence into a paragraph, but I don't because I respect other people's time and am aware of what kind of website I am on at the moment.
shut..gif

like please, we came here for content or discuss things related to said content, not whatever the fuck this is
 
Last edited:

GrabberWalkie

Active Member
Jul 9, 2020
917
1,413
183
bruh, just shut the fuck up man, you complain about people having off topic discussions here that are both short and short lived, while your post fucking walls of text, I wasted my time reading your nothing burger, shut the fuck up. bruh
This thread has become a community of sorts, always the same faces, people are just having a chat while there's not much content to share, it's not a content thread for a specific creator.
so, please kindly show yourself out, or shut the hell up and stop larping as an intelectual when we all know you're clearly not.
I too can try using fancier words, turn a simple sentence into a paragraph, but I don't because I respect other people's time and am aware of what kind of website I am on at the moment.
View attachment 5515121
Oh gods, can we PLEASE stop fighting about whatever it is you guys're fighting over and get back to the FoM content? It's the second time a derailment has happened in this thread this week! :mad::cautious:
 
  • Sad
Reactions: Choo-choo

GrabberWalkie

Active Member
Jul 9, 2020
917
1,413
183
By the way, Choo-choo, did you know Spodvohomgames uploaded to itch.io? Personally, I'd rather he returned to Mad Mucks or continued some of his older stuff, but I'm not paying him, so who cares about what I think. :cautious:
 

Choo-choo

Active Member
Aug 8, 2017
838
2,146
447
Short update - vpn/site access broken, cannot visit without some hurdles, looking and waiting for solution, so updates will be much more rare. (y)
 
  • Sad
Reactions: Icy Frost
5.00 star(s) 18 Votes