I don't get why you keep insisting the guardians are under her command when multiple characters, including the queen herself, have directly and indirectly stated that this isn't the case like here:
You're treating Guardians as if they were there from the beginning and are rulers of their respective kingdoms. Which is absolutely fucking not true.
I did not imply anything. The phrase "USSR was killing Ukrainians" is too unspecified, that's why I asked.
I said relative peace era not because there were no wars after WW2, but because the scale of them was much smaller.
"But how many other kingdoms are being spied by Timfalme?", other countries will ask, and I doubt they will believe just word proofs.
If I remember correctly, the main reason she just yoinked them from neutral lands was because the crime itself was done in the Timfalme territory, not because it was a Timfalme citizen. And it makes sense. Just imagine how many law enforcement departments must be created to simply have enough men tracking down and capturing criminals outside the borders. Also the fact that it was so easy to find them played at hand. If there were no tracking spell, or they managed to get to Homaspernia, or even sail to another continent, MC would be gone for good.
Dude's thinking that guardians are like clones from SW series. "Guardians, exectue order 69" - and bam, every government on every kingdom is nuked. It's not how it works. If Orphelith had total control over guardians, she could just order them to not start wars, which is an obivous bullcrap.
And then Eliette said that she could refuse from an offer to become a guardian, still she decided to just for helping people. Now we contradict the game itself, bruh.
I honestly would like to know where tf do you get these from. There is simply no info to state something like that. We dont know how old other kingdoms are, we don't know in what curcimstances they were when guardian decree went into effect, we don't know the reaction of kingdoms to it. The only thing there is to know is that they accepted it. What if Timfalme was the very first kingdom in Lamidania? How could it usurp the power from kingdoms that did not existed yet? Why do you think kingdoms had no choice? What if simply none of them disagreed, because everyone's interests were respected?
She manages to find the MC if you forget the tracking spell code word, so you're wrong there- that's the "special condition" that leads her to stompy-stomp with impunity.
I too am not sure about "too unfair", since wars are usually won by being unfair, but "too many lives" might mean excessive violence and/or civilian involvement. It makes sense at least.
That is because it wasn't too far from the borders. MC manages to get out all by himself on foot, while bleeding. Again, if they didn't stop in that hideout and just kept riding - no chance.
I am trying to justify why Timfalme is not making big political moves. As I said already, nobody knows for sure what any of it might lead to. Also what do you mean by "doing nothing"? Not involving in wars? They do, if it's too unfair. However, there were no chances to see how exactly it is done. Why don't they interfere in every big conflict? There are tons of reasons for it.
If Timfalme didn't have the continent's strongest standing army this conversation would not exist. How would we judge actions (or inactions) of the strongest kingdom it wasn't the strongest?
With all due respect, I believe it's pointless in arguing with YouShallNotLol. I really don't like to spread gossips, but trust me, after arguing with this person like 3 or 4 times (which resulted me being blocked by them btw) and now for the 5th time looking at their figments you are currently trying to parry, I believe that there is no point in even doing so.
I don't think that if she starts jumping or running around, much problems will be solved.
Shouldn't she at least outlaw slavery in hell kingdom?
The guardians are either the rulers themselves or giantesses with a significant amount of influence over their kingdom. This becomes painfully obvious when you consider that Naya is a guardian despite the fact that her shenanigans are ruining relations between Lycalis and Viridice.
I just want to know what he, and other people in general, bases his arguments on. GG is a big game with many routes, it's easy to overlook things.
-The question is, how would they enforce it? Slavery seems to be ingrained in homaspernian culture, banning it is meaningless if it's not enforced because homaspernians will simply ignore the law.
Slavery is already an essential social and economic part of that kingdom. You can't just forbid it without consequences, not to mention, that the most powerfull layer of the population will not be happy about it.
Fair point, but whats also fair is that even if Madea's words didn't stop Naya, then how could queen's do? Naya reflect the free spirit of Lycalians, her people, that's why I think she can't just stop, adding to that her lack of education and general childness.
There goes Hawaii, there there there goes Hawaii. Oh, there goes Hawaii, the island is gone.
Still, that's how it works sadly. Right when one of the sides start declining any others, the discussion turns into a "mud slinging". When a person falls so deeply in love with their own thoughts, that even the fact that someone thinks differently make them feel as unprotected as forcing others to believe their "truth", things get ugly, especially if these theories are ignoring or simply contradicting the actual game lore.
Most of the people here take info from the game, and then theorise using logic, common sense or historical similarities.
