From Grok (I thought it seemed sketch also looking at the behaviour section, which is why I prompted Grok with it):
1. Overall Verdict & Context
- Detection Ratio: 4 malicious / 72 vendors (low, ~5.5%). This isn't a slam-dunk trojan like Emotet, but behavioral analysis overrides static scans here—malware often flies under radar initially.
- File Basics: 149.50 KB DLL, analyzed 3 days ago (recent, so limited intel). Tagged with "pedll64bitsdetect-debug-environment" – implies it's a 64-bit PE (Portable Executable) DLL probed for debug/sandbox envs.
- Sandbox Summary:
- No direct "detections" (e.g., no IDS/Sigma rules), but 1 low-severity MITRE hit and 6 info-level.
- Behavior similarity hashes vary across sandboxes, showing inconsistent execution (common in evasive code).
- Risk Level: Medium-High. Benign if it's a dev artifact (e.g., auto-generated Burst lib crashing in sandboxes), but evasion tactics + rundll32 abuse point to malware. Run it? Only in a fully isolated VM.
2. MITRE ATT&CK Mapping
The report flags tactics under Defense Evasion (TA0005) and Discovery (TA0007). No execution or persistence, which is odd for full malware—suggests this is a
stage 1 loader testing the env before phoning home. Here's a table of the techniques:
