- Jan 4, 2018
- 677
- 755
I feel it's just about right. Blatantly disruptive and inflammatory shit gets taken care of, most of the rest is left alone or dealt with through warnings. That's really all that's needed. Any more and it would start driving people away and stir up a lot of unnecessary animosity.
While I also prefer to see constructive criticism, I got to say it reeks of self-entitlement to try and demand it from everyone in order for them to deserve having a voice. Usually I can tell if a post is worth wasting time on within the first few seconds of scanning through it. It's a skill anyone can pick up with experience; it becomes second nature ignoring such posts. If you're really worried about wasting your time, maybe don't spend so much of it on forums in the first place. >.<
While I also prefer to see constructive criticism, I got to say it reeks of self-entitlement to try and demand it from everyone in order for them to deserve having a voice. Usually I can tell if a post is worth wasting time on within the first few seconds of scanning through it. It's a skill anyone can pick up with experience; it becomes second nature ignoring such posts. If you're really worried about wasting your time, maybe don't spend so much of it on forums in the first place. >.<