Why do so many would-be devs feel the need to denigrate those that came before them? It's completely unnecessary and is only going to earn you animosity.
Insomnimaniac Games
I want to have a friendly disagreement with you on being upset with potential devs like this. I've seen you make a couple other posts on these up-and-coming / prospective developer posts for saying similar things and Idk, I want to chime in and disagree. I don't really think it's denegrating at all.
I think the OP's statement "most of X(genre) of porn games are abysmally shallow" isn't exactly a controversial one and it wouldn't matter what genre you put in there.
-Consider how many games on here are generated with AI with pictures or scenes written/drawn by a computer.
-Consider how many games on here follow the same exact formula of gameplay as one another.
-Consider how many games on here are abandoned unfinished messes.
For every game that does something interesting, bold or has something to say, there are well over 3 that don't, and 3 more that burn away their potential in development hell.
With all this in mind, I feel like that's a VERY valid opinion to have and a reasonable thing to say.
And I don't think that's anything to take offense at here, especially for any devs actively and passionately making their own games. He's being critical of the common shortcomings of the genre/medium, not the genre/medium as a whole. And he's being critical of the genre because it's something he really likes, these statements are made out of passion to build something of his own, not to denigrate and step on everyone who came before.
Like, I'd 100% agree with you if someone showed up and made the claim that ALL eroge games suck and they are here to show us all how it's done. But the difference between saying "most" and "all" in statements like these is a pretty huge difference, at least that's what i think.
Otherwise ain't nothing wrong with a
kind of attitude. It's a huge motivator for many creators. Lots of us set out to make the game we want to play. To me, that's all these statements are really saying. I don't think it's an attack on everyone else.
I say we take it easy on the new people. They'll have their trial by fire when they release their game and get feedback.
That being said, I understand why you tell the new devs to curb their competetive attitudes and stuff, I do think you tend to read more spite into these new developer motivations than there are.
Back when I made my first devlog post on here, I remember I probably said something in a similar vein to OP, but it was really out of love for the genre, I want to make what i see as unfulfilled potential. I don't hate all the games that didn't live up to my standards, i love them, they are what motivated me to be here making games. Inspiring someone to attempt to make something better than you because they saw missed potential in what you did, is probably the furthest thing from denigrating as there could be. If someone does that for something i make on day, hell yeah.
A great example of this, Salvor deep just finished development and a whole team of fans has already banded together to make a game that's similar but with a focus on monster fucking because they thought the first game would have been better if that was a big feature. They asked him for permission and they're going full speed ahead.
Anyways, I hope this post doesn't feel condescending at all, I don't want to insult your intelligence or pick a fight, just wanted to share a different perspective. I just see these statements in a very different way because i feel like i used to be in the same spot as lots of these new developers. Anyways, that's my two cents, thanks for reading if you did.
To Verdance, good luck with development!