Beast Content is non-canon, there's a choice at the very start of the content so you YOU are in charge of viewing it or not.
You need the Forbidden Card before anything else and YOU the player have to select if you want to view the Beastiality content on Lovers OR Corruption. It's not canon, it's to add said Beast content, and it's overall inclusion is because if I remove it, people complain that they cannot view it on Lovers Routes. I'll look at it but so far, I've made it so YOU have to be in charge if you want it to view it or not. If you pick No, you never see it and the choice never comes back. It's not my fault if you chose Yes to the beast content but then regret it later on.
I also added a Exit with this last update. You are once again given authority to continue the Beast Content or Remove it just like that first choice. If you regret the choice, not up to me which I why I presented the Yes or No BEFORE you even get 1 single sex scene.
Also Asuna is only an NTR target if you Choose Corruption. She breaks up with Kirito early on and if you wish to keep Asuna to yourself, pick Lovers. Asuna has NO STEALING content nor will she have it on Lovers Route.
Eh, this is splitting hairs. Crossover characters are written with the Lore somewhat intact but there is no "Jumping on dick in no time flat." Asuna took months before she was able to jump on the Hero's dick and she refused actual sex until weeks afterwards. For Orihime, this is the same. She also takes months to accept her feelings for someone else.
Plus who plays porn games to only be told "Sorry, I'm saving myself for someone else?" You might as well just not even include them as a potential LI.
I used "jumping on another dick in no time flat." more figuratively than literally, cause she did jump to another dudes arms both physically and emotionally almost instantly.
Also... given who they are based on... they would never logically have other feelings to accept. hence my point of changing the canon OBVIOUSLY so the player knows they are simply a proper parody.
Making the OG MC a female is a great way to do it too, since you now have another LI
It is also about respecting the source material more, cause most fans of what you are parodying won't like content that disrepcects/ruins/destroys the thing they like about it in the first place. (there is a reason most Kagyua parodies here, don't have love is war fans... because it is all NTR on the main MC from a show all about their loving and loyal relationship, and it beingwholesome).
And I ask you not spread misinformation. As of this next update, I've made Leonore much easier to stomach and the choice for her and Sam to come in much earlier. I've even made it canon so you can be content that you will skip over all the previous older scenes entirely.
While I do understand your concern over misinformation, this is currently how it is, so it isn't misinformation.
Having said that changing when it happens isn't the issue... it is that it happens and degree it happens. :| like if you playing a lovers route... your don't want NTR that went full sexual... well you don't want any NTR, but you seem set on having it.
honestly, I don't get why you have it happen at all during the time MC is gone... you already did the whole drive her to MCs arm thing before he was temporarily gone. IMO should be only something on the corruption route from that initial point on.
Maya, Camila, Athena, Ai, Mai Twins, Admin, Leafa, Maria, Mina, Ming, Rixxa, etc, etc, etc.
All of these women are 100% loyal to the MC in their Lovers Route. There isn't any sharing, NTR, or gang content once you choose Lovers. I have always respected the Choices a player makes in King's Fall ESPECIALLIY the Beast content because the game WARNS you before you even see one piece of writing for it. If you picked to see the Beast content that's on YOU bro. I did not force you hand, I detailed what the content would be like, and I warned you ahead of time. If you regret your choice, start a new game, use Skips or Relationship Stamps, and go back to that Choice and say No.
edit: To preface the following, I wrote the reply besides the later important edit, before knowing that it is locked behind loli card. (to which I highly suggest, give it's own card, with a funny password suggestion too).
I don't mean to be rude, but you contradict yourself here, you say they are 100% loyal to MC on lovers route, and then there isn't any sharing.... yet on that same route you have beast content... which is both not 100% loyal, and is sharing...
In fact is is more extreme than sharing because it is with a dog.... (if players don't want to share with a human.. they certainly don't want to share with a dog).
Being 100% loyal means the idea of being with someone other than MC is repulsive to them.
Also if you can, please re-read my comments, cause I explicitly state that I
DIDN'T CHOOSE IT, it's about how it is presented, and the TMI factor.
You can't realistically expect anyone to believe that the LIs are 100% loyal and love MC, when at the same time you basically go "Hey here's this quest, which will stick around on your quest list if you reject it, where these same LIs are going to be more than ecstatic to fuck this dog, and be shared with it, so the dog can fuck them while you're out."
On the lovers route...
hence my suggestion to make it a card, because it being presented that way MAKES IT CANNON, since you make it a thing the LIs are more than willing to do, and it is MC's choice that stops them, not the LIs choice, so it is now within their personality to do such things on the lovers route by it being something MC i.e. the player, has to stop from happening.
Where as a card, means the player has to go out of their way to get it to happen.
Presentation matters.
I leave it as Lovers or Corruption because that's the story I wish to tell. If you're on Lovers and do NOT wish to share any LI's with Beastialiaty Content, Say NO. The game is not forcing you to say Yes even though you think it is. And again, this content is not Canon. You miss no story or content if you say No
You say it isn't canon, but given the way you have done it, it is.... and effects the LIs personalities as you know make it part of them on the lovers route, just that the player stops it (as i mentioned above).
Also... as mentioned, you contradict yourself, as you said above "There isn't any sharing.... once you choose lovers." yet you have just started "If you're on lovers and do NOT wish to share any LI's..."
You can't have it both ways, there is either no sharing, or there is.
What the game
IS forcing on the player, is that
IN canon, the LIs
WOULD fuck the dog, and likely already want to,
BECAUSE of how you implemented the choice.
As it is something the MC/player stops from happening, not something they induce to happen. (again, presentation matters).
IMPORTANT EDIT: just read this part: "You need the Forbidden Card before anything else and YOU the player have to select if you want to view the Beastiality content on Lovers OR Corruption."
I would suggest making it two cards, because it is presented and stated that it is the Loli card... sooo yeah. (and you get people who'd want one and not the other... like myself
man wants petite, but it always gets labelled as loli, although sometimes the art does go loli so label still belongs).
Which would making my whole issue irrelevant btw, since the whole "Player has to cause it to happen" buy purchasing the card, would be met.
And will correct myself, it isn't canon on the main game cause of the card, but is still canon on the any playthrough that enables loli, because it enables both as a result.
And well, there is no hint you are enabling both... even the code for the card suggests as much. "LEWDTHELOLI".....
So would suggest adding a new card, call it the "Cursed Card" and the code be "RELEASETHEHOUND"
Would solve pretty much all the issues mentioned in regards to the beast content. (besides the whole no sharing, but still has sharing point... you kinda can't have no sharing on a route, but then have choice of sharing, it is a binary issue, it either has it, or doesn't, although it does limit it to the beast card... so a non-issue really, since the contradiction would ONLY happen when beast content is enabled).
