With *every* game everywhere--computer games, social games, board games--there are *always* some specific, arbitrary bits portrayed realistically and placed along side with all the other bits that are non-realistic or fantastic.
My vote would be for CoBOL, both the 2nd & 3rd generations. [shudder]
)
Are you sure you enabled incest in the game settings? It starts set to "incest not allowed" in a fresh game, so did you change it after getting the latest version?
Is the option turned on? Iirc, Inno had to reset that file for some recent changes.
Also, just to be sure: the characters you speak of, *can* they be attracted to you? (Someone attracted to only women will not be attracted to a male, for example.)
Yeah, you're right.
^
Ahh The infamous "Java is bad" circle jerk. If you think a "Hello world" program is 400mb you have not clue what you're talking about. And you don't understand the overhead of JVM. Go ahead and make full flueged productions programs in python and let me know how that turns out.
Innoxia is removing companions in 3.9, I'll assume that's what you mean. Slaves and slavery mechanics are still there working the same as they always have, except for the companion part of it.
I just can't miss the flame
Yes, absolutely. There's not much being added this update, it's again a bit disappointing. Inno really needs to finish up the Rat Warrens soon, without big delays, and then get to the Foloi Fields. I've often defended her in the past, but the next 2 or 3 months are crucial.
To be absolutely clear:
If you go back a few updates (probably quite a few updates), there was a time where that was true. Sex with a Taur was more 'realistic' and your options were limited in sex. There was no 'fondle their naughty bits you while you bang them' options, it was pretty much click the 'fuck' button and that was it and apparently people were complaining about it.
The problem with taurs is, they go all the way from your classic 3m warhorse centaur who needs a rake to scratch his own arse down to a little 125cm cat- or foxtaur who could quite happily lick his own balls if that action wasn't still missing. So when Inno consolidated all the positions into the newer generic sex system (remember how only certain encounters had options to utilize a desk or have a threesome before that?), she chose to err on the side of "let the player figure out if their particular taur could do this and how".
Exactly what I thought. Instead of adding differences and uniqueness to characters Innoxia decided to just let the player play pretend with what is doable and what isn't, and this goes for a lot of other things in LT as well. The "sandbox" part is too big when compared to the "game" one.
