That is stretched, you can also say if developer wants to make a game he should find publisher that will fund it instead of relying on public support? By signing publishing deal he will have to deliver the game, with public funding he dose not, why only consume have to take a risk?
Anyhow loanarpg is a decent game worth of support, shame that it was rejected by steam but that wasn't surprise.
Does this mean that so-called piracy is justified in some cases?
For example, when consumers need to defend themselves in order not to take risks unilaterally?
By the way, I also think that LonaRPG is a worthwhile game.
So, if possible, I would like to see everyone actively support the developers in a healthy way with legitimate payments, debug reports, etc., and I hope that this will motivate the developers to further increase the value of LonaRPG.
I don't think discussing this topic any more is going to make anything better, so I'm not going to touch it anymore.
I apologize if anyone has been offended by any of my posts so far.